ipl-logo

St. Thomas Aquinas Ideal Form Of Government

1533 Words7 Pages

ST. THOMAS AQUINAS
Saint Thomas Aquinas was born on 28 January 1225 and died on 7 march 1274. He was the patron saint of Academics, students, schools and universities. He was well known as a theologian, political thinker and a catholic priest. He wrote various commentaries on Aristotle’s works such as “Nichomachean ethics.” He had various philosophies regarding law, political authority, just war, best government. Etc. His thoughts on the best government tells us that kingship was the most ideal form of government. According to St. Thomas, a single ruler with experience, love for nature and a deep importance for unity can maintain integrity and can avoid disintegration and division. He also …show more content…

Thomas Aquinas promoted monarchy with mixed constitution, he stressed on the disadvantages of tyranny. He admitted that the rule by a single person could be the best and the worst form of government if it’s not exercised properly. He believed that compared to tyranny, democracy would be preferable. According to Aquinas, a tyrant is a person who rules for the benefit of himself rather than for the benefit of the state. The most important aim of the king is to achieve the common goals and well-being of the state. He had set various solutions in the case of tyranny which includes obedience and duty. He believed that it’s the duty of the ruler to have obedience to his political authority which he has derived from god and such power will cease to exist if the king does not do his duty of obedience. Tyranny is born if the king abuses his power or if the title given to him was not within his capabilities and skills. He drew a conclusion saying that if a tyrant uses violence to attain authority, then a person who kills the tyrant to free himself and his state will be praised and rewarded for his act. He further argued that a person has the right to kill the tyrant because the ruler has not faithfully fulfilled and obeyed his duties as a king of the state. His major concern was regarding how to remove a tyrant successfully without bloodshed, war and loss of property. He says that it is better to bear a tyrant form of government if the loss of removing the tyrant is …show more content…

Thomas Aquinas have contributed immensely to not only politics but also education. His works have influenced the western cultures and religion. His thoughts on the ideal form of government has been recognized by the Catholic Church and can be applied in various aspects of one’s life. Various Christian leaders have applied the principles, ideas and philosophies of St. Aquinas on the best form of government in various social, economic and political situations. Even non Catholics adopted his principles in their modern life; one such example is Morton Adler who was influenced by St. Thomas’s book ‘Summa Theologica’ that he wanted to convert to a catholic. His theories have also influenced other political thinkers and philosophers to develop their ideas and principles. Several books have also been published based on the theories of St. Thomas Aquinas. His theories have been revolutionary for those who followed St. Augustine and various other political philosophers. His thoughts have been praised for its practicality, clarity and modernity. His writings on best form of government were first seen as a threat to not only the state but also to religion as he promoted monarchy- a rule by a single person. But his writings have helped the catholic churches face the struggles throughout the ages and make revolutions. St. Thomas’s influence grew stronger over time and his thoughts were used to develop theologies and helped in the formation of various

Show More
Related
808 Words | 4 Pages

His ideas were dominant over other philosophers' about how a government should be run during the beginning of the French Revolution. “Democratic and Aristocratic states are not in their own nature free. Political liberty is to be found only in moderate governments; and even in these it is not always found. It is there only when there is no abuse of power. But constant experience shows us that every man invested with power is apt to use it, and to carry his authority as far as it will go.”

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

• Thomas used Aristotle’s view of natural law to justify the authority of the Roman Catholic Church in political as well as religious matters. For the purpose of explaining the fundamental reasons of law he used Aristotle’s philosophy and added the use of an eternal ruler. John Locke • John Locke had a distinct influence on the writers of the American Constitution by advocating for human rights and liberty through democracy. In saying so, he believed that the mass majority of ordinary people can be capable of giving consent to their governor/ruler as opposed to the Monarch government. However if the ruler did not comply with the needs of the people, Locke believed that the public had the justified right to rebel.

Read More
544 Words | 3 Pages

He thought that the power lies in the hands of the people and their elected government officials. He also believed that there should be an elected president in place of a monarch. These thoughts helped the people have more power and can control who they think is capable to be in charge of them. This also gave the people the option to change their leader if the people find him not good enough to rule. This could help the people to have a say on taxes and other laws they oppose.

Read More
901 Words | 4 Pages

Thomas Hobbes He liked to study various types of government. He thought that the government of a monarchy was better than democracy because he had no doubt that they were naturally wicked and were not to be trusted to govern. He believed that it was better to have a governor like a king that would know how to act like a leader and rule a country.

Read More
660 Words | 3 Pages

Absolute monarchy is rule by one person, usually a King or Queen, who obtains absolute power of authority with no repercussions for what he or she does. Bishop Bossuet held strongly to the argument of absolute monarchy, whereas John Locke opposed on the basis of man's natural rights. Bossuet and Locke have different views on the government’s source of power and their ideas about the rights of the people, but agreed that their chosen theories are in the best interest of the people and held their country's unity in high regard. The first thing we can look at when comparing the two philosophers ideas, is their differences of opinions on the government's source of power.

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

And in response Simonides argues that there are some ways that the tyrant can redeem himself and get the love and attention that he craves and tries to advice him and show him these ways. In general, tyrants are sovereign rulers who rule over unwilling subjects by force. They have control over almost everything and everyone in the state, meaning there is no consideration for law. Tyrants always think of themselves

Read More
1097 Words | 5 Pages

These actions were something few royal figures of the time would even consider. In Catt’s book, Frederick’s radical approach is further exemplified when he states kings should not hesitate to sacrifice themselves for the wellbeing of their own country (53). Traditional ways of thought provided the King with ample protection and placed him at the focal point of the kingdom. Frederick rejected the old ways and implemented new principles related to Enlightenment ideals by being second to his

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

His views were most fully developed in the famous Second Treatise Concerning Civil Government; his views were so radical that he only expressed authorship in his will. He expressed the view that government is morally obliged to serve people, namely by protecting their natural rights of

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

This religious aspect to these absolute monarchs caused the people to have respect for their rulers. People thought “Fear God, Honor the King.” (Document 5) It meant that people should have faith in their Kings and fear the course that God has set for them. They believed that monarchs were sent to do the good deeds of god and that using their power for evil was a horrible sin.

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

Thomas Jefferson’s works and ideas laid the foundation for several key aspects on the limits of the United States government, the idea of separation of church and state, and the importance of personal rights. Jefferson wrote many influential pieces of literature which pushed the concept of having limited government power. Jefferson wanted America not to be like the European monarchies that fell due to religious strife, so he emphasized a secular government. Jefferson, following closely with the ideas of John Locke, stressed the importance of the protection of individual rights against the government. Thomas Jefferson believed that a government should have limitations.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

The composition and the governing structure of the Roman republic was not uniform throughout its existence, but some of the fundamental elements of its government came into being in the immediate aftermath of the monarchy’s collapse. Therefore, it is unsurprising that many of these institutions were created in reaction to the monarchy and its failures, and thus were shaped by this relationship. For example, the fundamental opposition to monarchy and the rule of kings that came with the experience of the Kingdom of Rome, remained quite strong in the Roman mindset throughout the existence of the Republic and into the beginnings of the Roman Empire, and its influence can be seen throughout Roman political discourse especially in the discussion

Read More
551 Words | 3 Pages

He denounced tyranny. He insisted that when government violates individual rights, people may legitimately rebel” (Powell 2). He believed that the government was created for the people and not just the monarchy and if the government fails it’s up to the people to ‘fix’ it. He influenced many people and philosophers, including Thomas Paine and Thomas

Read More
1232 Words | 5 Pages

He justifies the need for democracy, aristocracy and monarchy depending on location. The three philosophers use their judgment and prior knowledge on each other’s work to validate an ideal society, especially for the uprising continent of America. Governments are an established institution in every society. Though there are multiple types of governments, their purpose is fundamental to determining the influence on a civilization.

Read More
1255 Words | 6 Pages

A regime can be judged by no other criteria nor be assigned any other functions, than those proper to the lawful order as such. " He opposed "democracy," which at his time meant direct democracy, believing that majority rule posed a threat to individual liberty. He stated, "...democracy is, properly speaking, necessarily a despotism, because it establishes an executive power in which 'all ' decide for or even against one who does not agree; that is, 'all, ' who are not quite all, decide, and this is a contradiction of the general will with itself and with freedom." As with most writers at the time, he distinguished three forms of government i.e. democracy, aristocracy, and monarchy with mixed government as the most

Read More
703 Words | 3 Pages

Aristotle thought the best form of government was a polity or constitutional government; however, a polity was non-existent in Aristotle’s time. Correspondingly, Locke

Read More

More about St. Thomas Aquinas Ideal Form Of Government

Related Topics

Open Document