Karla Coronel Chapter 20 Problems 6) In my opinion the director is not responsible for the destroyed antiquity. For the following reasons: The agent's careless actions were not within his job. If the agent acts negligently out of his employment with the principal, the principal is not liable for damages caused by the actions of the agent.
MILLERSBURG — A Wooster man on Wednesday was given a chance to avoid prison when he was sentenced to complete a treatment program for admittedly being in possession of methamphetamine. Shaun Hall, 38, 540 High St., previously pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to aggravated possession of meth. In exchange for his guilty plea, a related charge of aggravated trafficking in meth was dismissed. Hall had faced up to a year in prison for the charge, and Judge Robert Rinfret imposed a term of 11 months, but immediately suspended the period of incarceration in favor of five years of community control, which includes the condition he complete a treatment program at the Stark Regional Community Corrections Center.
Brief of Moore v City of East Cleveland, Ohio 1. Name of Case: MOORE v CITY OF EAST CLEVELAND, OHIO 2. Name of Court: United States Supreme Court; Legal citation: 431 U.S. 494. Set of legal reporters; United States Supreme Court Reporter; Year of decision: 1977.
After the trial, Desmond’s sentencing reiterates the institutional racism of the courts, which adamantly enforced the tax violations related to the purchase of the move theater ticket. The detailed sentencing of the court defines the rejection of accusations of enforcing Jim Crow laws, which were bolstered by the judgment of tax evasion for the purchase of the tickets. These legalities define the specific tax codes that were violated in the perspective of the court: The statute based the rate of the amusement tax upon the price of the ticket. The Roseland Theater’s ticket prices were forty cents for downstairs seats, and thirty cents for upstairs seats.
For over 70 years the homes off of Woodlawn Avenue have been known as Hathorn Court. However, the community came together on Saturday to change the name to Woodlawn Court. "Hathorn Court has always had a stigma about it because of the crime rate that was here. We had a problem bringing it back to where it needs to be," said Property Manager, Don Paul. On Saturday, the community held a block party and clean up day.
Case Analysis: Trinity Western v. Law Society of Upper Canada In the following court case between Trinity Western University v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, Judges MacPherson, Cronk, and Pardu JJ, at the Ontario Court of Appeal, determine whether to grant accreditation to a private Christian University, that wants to open its own law school. The three-judge panel analyzes the Law Society of Upper Canada’s (LSUC) decision to not accredit Trinity Western’s proposed law facility, which took place in April 2014. The judges consider the Charter rights at stake, as well as the LSUC’s mandate. The case of TWU v. LSUC will be thoroughly examined, with a specific focus on key concepts that influence law-making, such as social development and change,
Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Larry Offutt (“Offutt”), appellant, was convicted of robbery with a dangerous weapon, attempted robbery with a dangerous weapon, and related charges. On appeal, Austin presents three questions for our review, which we have rephrased as follows: 1. Whether the trial court erred by limiting cross-examination of a state’s witness regarding her involvement in an unrelated offense. 2. Whether the trial court erred in overruling an objection to the prosecutor’s statements on the grounds that the statements impermissibly shift the burden of proof to the defense.
MILLERSBURG — Despite a plea for leniency expressed by the victim, a Sugarcreek man was unable to overcome a long history of criminal convictions and a bond violation when a Holmes County judge on Wednesday sentenced him to prison for making unwanted phone calls and threats to several members of a family over a period of months. David Lamar Schrock, 43, of 2578 State Route 39, previously pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to two counts of telephone harassment and one count of menacing by stalking. In exchange for his guilty plea, the state agreed to dismiss two additional counts of telephone harassment and three counts of menacing by stalking. The charges are made more serious because Schrock was convicted, in January 2016,
Imagine an individual, getting ready for their slumber. Now imagine an intruder breaking into there window with the intention to shoot anyone in its way. Recall that the homeowner is unable to legally defend himself and must retreat from the intruder. This scenario can be possible in all 50 states, but only Seventeen states do not give people the right to legally defend themselves, even if confronted with a person holding a weapon. This means a innocent person attempting to defend their family or himself would wrongly get accused if the intruder got injured.
White America will always have an advantage over blacks and it will continue to be this way, whether we would like to admit it or not. African Americans had the same capabilities to do anything a white American could, if not better in many circumstances. Unhappy with the hardships that challenged blacks’ freedom throughout their life, enslaved African American, Dred Scott, made a significant impact which eventually changed the views of slavery. Thus, the court ruling of the Dred Scott v. Sanford was established in 1857 which declared that slaves nor black men who were already free could be granted citizenship in the United States (Dred Scott v. Sandford, n.d.). Scott v Sanford court case was created to emphasize the wrongdoings of slave masters by expressing the poorly acts African Americans face while under the Declaration of Independence.
The woman; however, said that she saw the murder happen through the passing el train. This testimony does not match up with the old man’s testimony because the el train is so loud he not only
In 2005 Florida passed the country 's first titular Stand Your Ground (SYG) law. In only nine years after the SYG law had been passed in over twenty-three states, changing the lawful scene of self-protection. SYG law states that one has the right to use deadly force when his life, properties, family and home are in danger. Generally, the law means that one can shoot first and then ask questions. The Florida legislators, who passed the nation 's first SYG law, use every available opportunity to tell the story of James Workman, “an old man from Pensacola, FL. who shot an intruder who tried to loot his hurricane-destroyed home” (Montgomery, 2012).
Accordingly of accord with the above mentioned complainant declared a prima facie case 0f Harassment, Discrimination, and Retaliation on the basis of national origin when he shows the elements that apply such as: 1.- the Complainant's national origin “ Hispanic”. 2.- The complainant is otherwise qualifies for the benefits in question“ legally enrolled in the Tyler Junior College”.
Thesis: The state of Florida Stand your ground laws give the impression set against the minority, benefit the majority and exhibit loopholes that leaves the innocent without life. A. Stand your ground law was first pass in Florida were homicide is at its worst. B. The Stand your ground law set a pattern of allowing the guilty to be innocent and the innocent to be guilty. C. Shoot now and ask Question latter is not a peaceful answer to the problem in an environment with principles and laws that will protect the human race.
Every law or policy that has passed, has either made a good or bad effect on society, the decision makers does their best to create guidelines to turn them into rules that each individual must oblige by. While reading the requirements the first topic that came to mind was “stand your ground law" because it addresses the majority of ethical concept and assumptions listed. This case study will analyze the ethical issues policies of stand your ground law with different scenarios, as well some ideas for resolving these conflicts. Stand your ground law, basically gives anybody the right to use self-defense to protect their life, even their family. Wikipedia states that “an individual has no duty to retreat from any place, the individual has a lawful
