ipl-logo

Essay On Stanford Prison Study Vs Immunization Study

868 Words4 Pages

Discussion Assignment Unit 3 – ENGL 1102 This week you will discuss either the Immunization study or the Stanford Prison study. You will tell your fellow classmates which of the studies you felt led to the most harm and what you think could have been done by the scientists, the media, and the public to avoid or fix the harms caused. The immunization study  that took place in 1998  and the Stanford Prison study  that was planned for 2 weeks and was aborted after 6 days in 1971  led to negative consequences and impacted the participants of these studies and other people. I will discuss the immunization study in this discussion assignment because I believe it caused more harm than the Stanford Prison study in terms of its impact on a wider …show more content…

First medical ethicists should have created more rigid rules for researchers to follow. These rules should have set clear guidelines on what is permissible and what isn’t permissible in terms of research design, in addition to rules pertaining to the consent process which ensures that parents are aware of the purpose of the study and the relevant risks and benefits on the children who participated in this study. There also should be rules pertaining to the size of the sample, the way data is collected, analyzed, reported, and interpreted. There should have been a research ethics committee that reviews any research proposal involving experiments on human. Second, the researchers should have observed strict rules related to social and ethical responsibility. Third, the editors of the Lancet should have critically analyzed the method used, the conclusions emitted and how these findings might have impacted the public. Fourth, the 10 out of 12 authors shouldn’t have waited till 2004 to retract their conclusions. Fifth, the Lancet shouldn’t have waited till February 2010 to completely retract the paper in a small anonymous paragraph. Sixth, the Lancet shouldn’t have absolved the researchers in 2004 and then held them guilty in 2010 for ethical infringement and scientific falsification. Luckily, they were finally found guilty in 2011. Seventh, the media could have shed more light on this issue through numerous articles that would have exposed in simple words without using the medical jargon the erroneous claims of the study and how they were refuted by other researchers. It is worth noting that Brian Deer was the journalist on the Wakefield case. Eighth, the public could have used its critical thinking skills to avoid the trap of the media and parents could have sought medical advice before boycotting the

Show More
Related
144 Words | 1 Pages

Brian Deer 's article implements a subjective tone when confronting A.J Wakefield 's research. This tone of approach varies from common medical research journals because the arguments do not simply depend on factual based assertions. Like most research journals, any implications are supported by academic/peer reviewed sources. Brian Deer 's article however includes evidence and research collected through his own work; he actually questions and interviews the parents of the children diagnosed with this so called "new syndrome"(Deer 201). The key thing to note here is that all evidence collected on his own is likely to include biases.

Read More
1322 Words | 6 Pages

“In 1999, president Clinton’s National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC) issued a report saying that federal oversight of tissue research is “inadequate” and “ambiguous”. It recommended specific changes that would ensure patients’ rights to control how their tissues were being used.” (page 327). Unfortunately, the changes were never made and scientists still have the ability to conduct research on one’s tissues without consent. The reason for why the changes were nullified remain unknown even to Wayne Grody an individual “who was in thick of the debate in the nineties, (for) why the congressional recommendations and NBAC report seemed to have vanished.”.

Read More
1003 Words | 5 Pages

There are now laws that require every study to be examined and approved by committees before any experiment involve humans is

Read More
104 Words | 1 Pages

Petts and Niemeyer explore the controversy debate on what affects people from not getting their children vaccinated. They did a poll on who gets their children vaccinated and who does not get their children vaccinated. One factor Petts and Niemeyer discuss is why people are second guessing getting vaccinations for their children. The media has presented information, which led to false reports, although parents are acting upon these messages in which change their beliefs in vaccinations. Media has since affected the idea of vaccinations, parents are beginning to look into the vaccinations and predict if they will be mandatory or not for their children.

Read More
348 Words | 2 Pages

This study was passed and funded through Congress; however they did not know the full story. The wrong in this study was that the men did not give informed consent and did not receive any treatment. The men were studied till their autopsy, which is obviously death. This sparked much controversy and changed human experimentation forever.

Read More
1937 Words | 8 Pages

The job of the “Commission was to identify the basic ethical principles that should underlie the conduct of biomedical and behavioral research involving human subjects and to develop guidelines which should be followed to assure that such research is conducted in accordance with those principles.” (The National Commission for the Protection of Human

Read More
948 Words | 4 Pages

In the context of medical research, informed consent provides individuals with the opportunity to accept or decline involvement in research, and thereby adheres to their right to choose. Obtaining consent from donors is not limited to simply seeking permission, but involves explaining the nature and consequences of research in an honest and understandable manner. When this aspect of informed consent is ignored, unethical research ensues. For example, during the infamous Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments, US Public Health researchers studied the progression of syphilis in African American men, under the false pretense of curing their “bad blood”. Though a treatment of penicillin was available at the time, researchers idly observed as subjects died painful, preventable deaths.

Read More
1779 Words | 8 Pages

Accordingly, the movie provides historical context into why research practices have changed since the 1930s and highlights why the healthcare system needed to establish ethical guidelines for all healthcare professionals and researchers to follow. By exploring these ethical issues, the movie offers a complex and engaging representation of the study that allows for critical thinking about the difficult subject matter it

Read More
1440 Words | 6 Pages

Even given the fact that it was done in the past in a time where medical records and practices didn’t have to be formally take down what they did, but now that we are in an era where documentation is a necessary it should have been at least mentioned to people here in the present. Especially in this instance, it is evident that both neither the media nor the scientific community thought it was important to show people the person who made all of the scientific research and discoveries possible. Not only do the consequences of having this perspective ruin both their credibility and reliability but it also ruins their reputation. People no longer regard or remember

Read More
1564 Words | 7 Pages

The Belmont Report is now a required read for all participants involved in human research (ZZZ).   The Belmont Report addresses three ethical principles for human research participants.   One ethical principle is respect for the person.   Respect for the person requires medical researchers to obtain informed consent from study participants.   Additionally, the participants must be given accurate information about their circumstances and treatment options so they are allowed to decide what happens to them(ZZZ).

Read More
546 Words | 3 Pages

First of all, the investigators should have respected the people they were going to conduct by obtaining an informed consent, letting the men decide if they want to be a participant after all. Second of all, medical researchers should not have lied to the people about how long this study was going to last. Third of all, both the risks and the benefits of it should have been stated to them so that the men could decide if this experiment is any beneficial to them or not. Lastly, the participants should have been randomly assigned to the control or experimental group without considering their race, class, and gender. Also, the medical researchers should not have the right to give the favored participants the helpful treatment rather than the riskier

Read More
1244 Words | 5 Pages

Stephen Parnell Professor J. Bocharova Eng.-103-5015 16 March 2018 Vaccines are Killing Our Children For no other reason than freedom should any person be made to put anything into their body that they do not choose to. In fact in California it appears the law makers have put a gun to our heads mandating we vaccinate our children. When it comes to vaccinating we always hear how beneficial vaccinating is and the lives that vaccines have saved, but the consequences are often ignored. In a case of a father of five who became paraplegic from the Whooping cough vaccine.

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

The experiment was executed well. Yet, there are unethical practices happened during the experiment. First, the participants were not fully informed about the experiment. The researchers did not explain to the participants the processes in conducting the experiment. The participants were not informed that they would be arrested by cops in their homes.

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment: A Journey Into Authoritarian Leadership Over the years, scientists, psychologists, and doctors have used social experiments to further their understanding of our surroundings. Social experiments are studies of the human mind and psyche through various environments. In this case, a social experiment called the Stanford Prison Experiment is what opened new doors for the comprehension of human behavior, how we act when we are in power, as well as offered a glimpse into the flaws in our legal system. This experiment was conducted in 1971 in Palo Alto, California.

Read More
982 Words | 4 Pages

Some examples are that for the past several years we have heard that polio vaccine lead lymphoma and caused the AIDS epidemic, and the MMR vaccine lead to Crohn’s disease and autism. These theories, however have not bothered themselves with facts, that might be fair in the time of chiropractic’s infancy, but now, in the 20th century it is not acceptable. The lack of true information about vaccination is a struggle to the vaccination policy. A research by Kennedy et al. shows that health professionals consider that girls are empowered to make decisions about the HPV vaccine for themselves, some of them decide not to take the vaccine for the lack of information.

Read More

More about Essay On Stanford Prison Study Vs Immunization Study

Related Topics

Open Document