ipl-logo

State's Rights Issue In 1860

1081 Words5 Pages

In 1860, the Southern slave states elected to secede from the United States of America and form the Confederate States of America. The issues that resulted in the secession of the south included disagreements over tariffs and state rights, but the greatest issue was over slavery, which was legal and a large part of culture and economy in the South but had been slowly prohibited by states in the North. As the United States expanded into the West with new territories, fierce debates started over whether or not slavery would be legal in those expanded territories. People in the South feared that not allowing slavery in these new states would eventually cause slavery to be outlawed in all of America. Southerners were also bitter about how Southern …show more content…

State's rights involved the decreasing power of the states and the rights not granted the federal government being taken over. The debate over which powers rightly belonged to the states and which to the Federal Government became fierce in the 1820s and 1830s, fueled by the issue of whether slavery would be allowed in the newly formed territories as the nation expanded to the west. The Missouri Compromise in 1820 and Wilmot Proviso in 1846 tried to solve the problem, the Compromise established lands west of the Mississippi and as slave states and north of the line as free, while the Wilmot Proviso was a proposed law designed to eliminate slavery within the land acquired from the Mexican War. David Wilmot appealed for Free Soil, asking “not that slavery be abolished. I demand that this government preserve the integrity of free territory against the aggressions of slavery — against its wrongful usurpations.” Abolitionist groups vaulted up in the North, causing people in the South to feel that their way of life and profit was under attack. They began to argue that slavery was not only necessary, but in fact, it was a positive good. The issue not only of slavery, but of the rights of the states among the North and the South also drove them away from certain issues such as national policy. Their interests in economy and political issues varied so differently that the positions they took in politics had as much to do about slavery as it did with their political interests. When state's rights arguments were proposed in the late 1840's in support of separation of the states, Congress responded with the Compromise of

Show More
Related

Sectional Tension Dbq Essay

730 Words | 3 Pages

As a result of the Compromise of 1850, which defused the quarrel between the free Northern States and the slave Southern States, the territories acquired during the Mexican-American War were determined to be free, slave, or dependent upon the principle of popular sovereignty. California was admitted as a free state, the Utah and New Mexico territories were to be determined by popular sovereignty, the Texas-New Mexico boundary was solidified, and slave trade was terminated in Washington, D.C., making it easier for the South to recover fugitive slaves (Document A). As stated by an Anonymous Georgian in “Plain Words for the North,” everything the South could ask for was embodied in the Constitution, but two provisions were necessary to the South’s success – “the recognition of slavery where the people choose it and the remedy for fugitive slaves” (Document B). The North saw popular sovereignty and the remedy of fugitive slaves as deceptive encouragement of immoral and unconstitutional activity (Document C). But, southerners viewed the North’s assumption of ownership to be unconstitutional.

Read More

Dbq Union And Division Essay

1198 Words | 5 Pages

This issue would come to a head following the election of Abraham Lincoln, who, despite not being against slavery, believed that it should not be allowed to spread into new US states. Southern states saw Lincoln’s election as an existential crisis that would stunt their growth and development

Read More

Civil War Dbq Essay

448 Words | 2 Pages

Southerners did not want Northerners to have more representatives, and vice versa. Then, in 1820, the Missouri Compromise allowed two states to join the nation, preserving the balance of slave holding and free states. This eased the congressional debate on slavery, until the topic of admitting four free states was introduced. Now, Southerners felt that soon they would be outnumbered, so they threatened to secede. In hopes of keeping the country together, Henry Clay devised the Compromise of 1850.

Read More

Civil War Dbq Essay

847 Words | 4 Pages

The United States of America was once severely divided over an extreme issue that needed to be quickly solved before it caused any serious damage on the country. The Northern part and the Southern part of the United States of America were both having intense arguments over the issue of slavery. The North deeply accepted the abolishment of slavery in the United States of America. However, the South was strongly supporting on the ability of having slaves anywhere in the United States of America. Before the American Civil War, the North had a immoral perspective on slavery and the South had a righteous outlook on slavery they had contrasting ideas.

Read More

Abraham Lincoln-Douglas Debates During The Civil War

1390 Words | 6 Pages

The American Civil War initiated directly from the northern and southern strained relations on controversial matters along with their intransigent attitudes. The Presidential Election of Abraham Lincoln engendered the secession forming the Confederate States of America due to the matter of states’ rights opposed to federal supremacy, slavery, and economic sectionalism. The United States Secession in 1860 involved seven states withdrawing from the Union, following four states after the emerging battle of the Civil War. Republicans opposed the enlargement of slavery flowing throughout the territories, therefore restricting the practice of slavery. Southern states discerned on the depriving control of federal government eventually overpowering slavery resulting to its prohibition.

Read More

Why Was The South Seceded Essay

797 Words | 4 Pages

When looking at why the South seceded we must first admit and recognize that is was very much a multi layered issue without a clear answer as to what was the reason the south seceded as there were so many factors. However, while most people believe that the south seceded because of slavery; while in fact, it was influenced more so by sectionalism and events by radicals such as Bleeding Kansas; therefore, southern secession was in fact not mainly over the issue of slavery, but rather over more complex internal issues the nation was seeing from sectionalism. We first have to remember the differences between the North and the South just as societies as well in terms of sectionalism. The societies of these 2 sections of the United States were vastly different. Economically there was competition between the 2 which led to competition for political policies to favor one or the other, which could’ve been compromised but wasn’t.

Read More

Why Did The South Led Up To The Civil War Essay

456 Words | 2 Pages

The South had the right to own slaves because there were no federal laws against it by which reflected states rights yet most Northerners refused to enforce some fugitive laws. For instance, Northerners did not support or agree with having to return any Southern escaped slave and going to jail along with having to pay a $1,000 fine if helped a runaway slave. As a result of the North not enforcing fugitive laws this angered the South causing even more tension. Thus, the tension between the South and the North would eventually lead up to the Southern secession which was the withdrawal from the country since many Southerners believed that the federal government was trying to take states rights due to also believing that the government would abolish slavery. Thereby, the North and the South were now officially divided which would eventually lead to the civil

Read More

Civil War Dbq

771 Words | 4 Pages

During the 1800’s, issues such as slavery became a huge topic in America. Today, most people believe the civil war was about slavery, but it was only part of it. The war was actually about preserving the Union. This makes me wonder, “What led to the secession of the South?” While it is hard to say abolitionists were directly responsible for the national discord in America, they were a key part in causing the increase of sectional divide.

Read More

What Is The Compromise Of 1860

378 Words | 2 Pages

Due to the fact that the South had more of an agricultural economy, the Southerners thought that the states should have the right to decide whether residents could own slaves, rather than the federal government. In 1846 a congressman from Pennsylvania named David Wilmot introduced a bill to the House of Representatives called the Wilmot Proviso. This said slavery would not be allowed in any western territory acquired from Mexico. Of course most of the politicians from the North loved the idea, while the politicians from the South did not. The Missouri Compromise on March 3, 1820 (also called the Compromise of 1820) was the first major legislative compromise that was passed to draw a line between slave and free territory.

Read More

Cultural Differences Between The North And South Dbq Analysis

706 Words | 3 Pages

Since colonial times the United States had been divided into two completely different parts. The Northern states were mostly free states who believed slavery should be put to end. On the other hand, the Southernern states were slaves states, meaning they were pro-slavery. Therefore, their two ideas about slavery clashed with one another causing great deal of problems such as battles, fights, and debates between the North and South. These disagreements eventually lead to the Southern states seceding from the Union.

Read More

How Did John Crittenden Compromise

405 Words | 2 Pages

When Abraham Lincoln became President there was a fear from the southerners that the southern way of life would end. The southerners thought that if the western territories became free states that the Republicans would change the Constitution and make slavery in all areas outlawed and many thought that they would leave the Union before this inflicted upon them. The southerners held back from the division until 1860 when Lincoln became President. In history it is known that South Carolina was the first state that began the secession. “On December 20, 1860, a state convention repealed South Carolina’s ratification of the U.S. Constitution and voted to withdraw from the Union.

Read More

How Did Slavery Cause Secession

1451 Words | 6 Pages

‘Slavery was the root cause of secession’. ‘November 6 1860, Lincoln was elected president of America which resulted in panic emerging in the South’ . The election of Lincoln as president who was a Republican leader meant that ideologies, movements and values from the North would be implemented in the South which meant the abolition of slavery. Slavery was a huge characteristic of the South as the economy; politics; social status and psychological mind-sets were influenced by the process of slavery. The southern white population then derived the idea of secession which meant the South would gain independence from Northern aggression .

Read More

Debate Over Slavery From 1830 To 1860

690 Words | 3 Pages

Debates over slavery in the period from 1830 to 1860 played a significant role in leading the United States into the Civil War. The issue of slavery was a major source of tension between the northern and southern states, and it was a key factor in the rising tensions between the two regions. The northern states were largely anti-slavery, and many abolitionists were active in calling for the immediate end of slavery. In contrast, the southern states were largely pro-slavery, and many slaveholders were deeply committed to maintaining the institution of slavery. One of the major debates that contributed to the outbreak of the Civil War was the question of whether slavery should be allowed in the territories acquired by the United States.

Read More

The Expansion Of Slavery In The West

159 Words | 1 Pages

The expansion of slavery in the Western territories had created a big deal of arguments. Ever since the drafting of the Constitution in 1787, the South and North had grown further apart in terms of economy, society, and ideology. The North feared that the South would force the expansion of slavery in Western territories due to the congressional debates. In hopes of preventing a Civil War, the federal government temporarily had determined the matter with compromises, however, those compromises appeared to be unbalanced and the sectional divides between the North and South became more prominent. After the United States had gained Texas and its Western territories, the matter with extending slavery in the West had been brought up again in Congress.

Read More

Effects Of Slavery

1128 Words | 5 Pages

This escalated and became a big issue, the northerners wanted the state to be free because they were abolitionists and believed that people were created equal and that it was morally wrong to have slaves. The westerners, on the other hand, were concerned because, at the time, slaves were very valuable, and many of the rich white men 's money was tied to slavery, therefore, if they lose their slaves, they lose all of their profit. Furthermore, the congress had been debating for a while on whether Missouri should be a slave state or a free state and came to the conclusion to enter it as a slave state but enter the state of Maine, simultaneously, as a free state to maintain the balance. The compromise stated that all land above latitude 36°; 30 ' N would forever be free states. This, however, was only a temporary

Read More

More about State's Rights Issue In 1860

Open Document