ipl-logo

Status Quo In Society

955 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Capitalism and communism compare and contrast

The first source depicts an ideology that holds the belief that change in society leads to radical thoughts that will later incite a revolution. The revolt would cause chaos and disarray to society. This expresses the ideal way to provide prosperity and harmony to society is for individuals to follow government law and order. The source, concerning the issue of the status quo in society, is a resolution that connects to classical liberalism. Conservatism is rooted in liberalism, explaining that its core values rely on maintaining the traditions and social structure in society. In the source, the speaker is strongly against change as it will take away individualism provided by the free market system. The free market enforces all individuals …show more content…

The person wants the state’s traditions to stay stagnant as it will lead to individuals with initiative to come out on top. The source, regarding the issue of the status quo in society, is a belief that connects to conservatism. Classical Liberalism is rooted in liberalism, meaning that the basic principles of democracy are behind their ideas in benefitting society. The intentions of conservatives are to provide opportunities through a private enterprise economy. The system highly encourages the ideals of individualism. The member is responsible for his own actions to take initiative and accomplish personal achievements. The government’s job is to protect these individuals as they strive for their goals, they should not intervene in the economy. The ideals of democratic socialism would be against this way of thinking as they believe in a centrally planned economy that emphasises equality for all classes. They would argue that the capitalist system is prone to unemployment of workers, inflation, and monopolies that causes inequality between members of society. Socialist strongly value cooperation over competition and strive to decrease poverty by distributing wealth in …show more content…

The first source believes that the social structure should remain the same and that change would inevitably cause a revolution. The conflict will result in the destruction of individual freedom. However, the second source would disagree with the notion of the first source as it promotes the ideals of a revolution, which will break down the class structure. The purpose would be to produce a government with the principles of an equal society where all members have the same rights and opportunities. The third source, nonetheless, would agree with the first source as they both share the belief to maintain the society with a limited government. The first and third source expresses the need for individualism in society to prosper, as competition and profit serve as key motivations for improving the economic state. The opposite ideas come from the second source as he advocates collectivism for states to thrive. The perspective declares that cooperation of each individual serves as inspiration to help the economy. Although the sources conflict in their vision of a perfect economy, they all share the idea that government protection is needed in society to progress. The safety of each member is a priority as it allows everyone to freely follow their passions and

Show More
Related
64 Words | 1 Pages

Ripple Effect Personal Organizing is a full-service professional organizing firm that is located in Oakland, California. Their services and specialities include working with seniors, working with the chronically disorganized, office organizing, unpack and organize new home, kitchen organizing, downsizing/simplifying, de-cluttering, and emergency preparedness. Ripple Effect Personal Organizing holds a Certificate of Study in Needs of the Aging and Certificate of Study in Chronic Disorganization.

Read More
970 Words | 4 Pages

The Industrial Revolution of the nineteenth century changed the European working lifestyles from agrarian to urban. This change of lifestyle happened very quickly, and left thousands of lower class working citizens in poverty. Throughout the nineteenth century several different arguments were made on how to improve the lives of European workers. Arguments made to improve the lives of European workers include: having a stronger government, giving more rights to the working class, turning towards a socialistic government, or simply maintaining the status quo. Documents 3, 7, and 9 claim that having a more involved government will improve living conditions for workers.

Read More
830 Words | 4 Pages

Madison proposes that factions themselves are the staple chaos of the ideal government as the only way to eliminate factions is “by destroying the liberty which is essential to its existence” or “by giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests.” He shows these solutions to be flawed as he thereafter notes that they are impractical and immoral. Marx, alternatively, has the staple chaos as the revolution of the proletariat to overthrow the bourgeoisie. He avoids acknowledging the problems and suffering that are associated with revolution and goes to great length to not label this as an “evil.” He paints revolution to be ideal and noble for the sake of his argument to convince the proletariat to

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

“In Common Sense, Paine addresses the problems of monarchy, the advisability of separation, the nature of society, and makes modest proposals for a new form of government” (Thomas Paine -- Common Sense -- Reading Revolutions). Paine used the comparison of people becoming

Read More
963 Words | 4 Pages

“A world where no man will hold desire for himself, but will direct his efforts to satisfy the desires of his neighbor who’ll have no desires but to satisfy the desires of the next neighbor who’ll have no desires - and so on…”(The Soul of a Collectivist) The speech focuses on how one snuffs out the individual desires of man and makes him work for the collective body of he and his neighbors. To form a collectivist society personal desire must seem as though it is a selfish sin, nobody can be great because “Great men can’t be ruled”(The Soul of a Collectivist), and singular thought can not be

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

What is conservatism? Well, conservatism is a standard value and idea with resistance to change. Conservatism was mentioned a lot in the 1980's. One of our many president's elections implied the return of conservatism. The known Conservative was the United States 40th President Ronald Reagan.

Read More
1236 Words | 5 Pages

The conservatism of this time sought to preserve the status quo, while the progressives aimed to reform society and politics. This led to a conflict between the two groups, with the conservatives often opposing progressive reforms. Despite this tension, conservation movement, for instance, drew support from both conservatives and progressives. Both groups recognized the importance of preserving natural resources for future generations, albeit for different reasons. The conservative values of the Progressive Era can also be seen in the push for American exceptionalism.

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

It supports the idea of big business and being socially conservative. Key social issues and

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

The people’s supply and demand needs are all controlled and maintained by the state. This conditioning creates the complete reliance on the state, and allows the state to control how a person perceives the world and themselves, their social role in life, and ultimately any sense of a higher being. Not only does conditioning eliminate the concept of individual identity, but it also distorts the person’s view of the natural world. The state is driven by science and technology, but it is also the conditioned hate against nature that defines life in the World State. In the text, nature and consumerism are consistently expressed in conflict with one another.

Read More
276 Words | 2 Pages

Picture this: you just get home from a long day of work or school and as you approach your front door, your security system senses you and the door automatically unlocks, interior lights turn on, and even when you walk in, your playlist begins to play through your surround sound system. With all the technology we have today and will gain in the future, all of this will be possible- including so much more. People who study or make thoughts and predictions about the future are called Futurists. Futurists spend most of their time studying what life on Earth will be like in the future, like homes, jobs, nature, education, and more. They try and figure out all the things that could happen to our world as the years go by-good and bad.

Read More
1253 Words | 6 Pages

The questions of the whether social inequality is justified and the extent of government to address said inequality are some of the foundations upon which societies and economies are built. Two key philosophers on this issue – John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau – differ on this subject. In Two Treatises on Government, Locke holds that individuals have a right to property derived from their labor, citizens consent to the existence of inequality in society, and governments are instituted among men to protect said property. In contrast, Rousseau writes in Discourse on the Origin of Inequality and The Social Contract that inequality should be strictly limited and that governments have a duty to act in the best interest of its citizens by maintaining

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

Therefore, a system based on only an economic principle, namely the market system, has no validity. It is an exceptional phenomenon in which the economy is disembedded from the society as an autonomous domain. This disembedding system renders the elements of production, land, labor, and money, into fictitious commodities. Through agricultural transformation land is included to the market system. Those who have private property on certain lands started to make us of it for the pure interest of themselves by excluding the peasants.

Read More
819 Words | 4 Pages

A conservative at this time would have favored tradition and critical proposals for radical social change. They believed that the government should provide people the freedom necessary to pursue their own goals. Industrialization declined the popularity of conservatism in the 19th century because it strengthened the middle class and created a new industrial working class. Conservatives had to establish majorities in parliament, so they could hold power. Conservatism attempted to preserve the hierarchy of order and valued tradition over

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

These different views are seen through the following articles: “Progressivism: Middle Class Disillusionment” by George Mowry, “Urban Liberalism and the Age of Reform” by Joseph Huthmacher, and “Progressivism Arrives” by Robert H. Wiebe. The first essay written by George Mowry provides

Read More
1333 Words | 6 Pages

Everyone has a perspective of their own about the government whether it be good or bad. Ancient Greek philosopher Plato and English philosopher John Locke both discuss the topic of government in their literatures. In the Republic by Plato, Plato introduces this concept of a just city. In this city, he believes that the older and wisest person(s) should rule as they are very knowledgeable. Everyone is born innately different according to Plato.

Read More

More about Status Quo In Society

Related Topics

Open Document