ipl-logo

Statute Of Limitation

578 Words3 Pages

"Drop Dead " which is what some lawyers are describing Statute of Limitation Because, a case is dead if not filed by the deadline. Statute of Limitations are laws that set the deadlines for filling lawsuits in civil cases and for filling formal charges in criminal cases. Statute of Limitation is fair for both Plaintiff and the Defendant because, it helps to ensure fairness in legal disputes between individuals, diminish unreliable cases over time,help to create a level playing field for plaintiffs and defendants. To begin with, Statute of Limitations is fair for both Plaintiff and Defendant because it helps to ensure fairness in legal disputes between individuals. According to the article it stated "If the law failed to provide a deadline, then a person could face a lawsuit decades after an alleged injury happened." which mean it limits the time for filling a lawsuit to allow peace of mind.This is one reason why Statute of Limitation is fair for both Plaintiff and defendant. In addition , Statute of Limitation is fair for both Plaintiff and Defendant because, it diminish …show more content…

To sum it all up , Statute of Limitation is fair for both Plaintiff and Defendant because , it helps to ensure fairness in legal disputes between individuals, diminish unreliable cases over time, help to create a level playing field for plaintiffs and defendants.It helps to ensure fairness in legal disputes between individuals which mean it limits the time for filling a lawsuit to allow peace of mind. Diminish unreliable cases over time which mean as time go by their memory of what happened had slowly faded . Help to create a level playing field for plaintiffs and defendants which means without Statute of limitation the person who brings a case against another in a court of law can just come after years of a situation gather enough information which is unfair advantage . These are some reasons why Statute of Limitation is fair for both Plaintiff and

Show More
Related
1318 Words | 6 Pages

Nathanson continues to argue against capital punishment by arguing not only against the equal punishment principle but also the proportional retributivism view. While Nathanson believes proportional retributivism plays an important role our determination of appropriate punishment for criminals, it does not, however, apply nor aide arguments in favor of the death

Read More
141 Words | 1 Pages

Idaho statute, Title 18 Crimes and Punishments, Chapter 15 Children and Vulnerable Adults, Section 1 Injury to Children (18-1501), states that any person who, under circumstances or conditions likely to produce great bodily harm or death, willfully causes or permits any child to suffer, or inflicts thereon unjustifiable physical pain or mental suffering (Idaho Legislature 2014). If a person is over the age of 18 years old and commits a crime of injury to a child if the person transports a minor in a vehicle as defined in section 67-7003, Idaho Code, while under the influence of a controlled substance, or any combination thereof, in violation of section 18-8004 or 67-7034, Idaho Code. The punishment would be a felony under the law and could

Read More
1196 Words | 5 Pages

“I shall emphasize this aspect of the circumstances of justice by assuming that the parties take no interest in one another’s interest... Thus, one can say, in brief, that the circumstances of justice obtain whenever mutually disinterested persons put forward conflicting claims...” (Relation between Individual and Society, by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.) So, justice is only achieved if both parties or persons reveal their different claims.

Read More
772 Words | 4 Pages

A man sits upon the stand as he hopes for the jury to plead him not guilty. The American Jury System has been in the United States Judicial Branch for over 385 years. The basis of a bench trial is that there is only a Judge that decides whether the accused is guilty or not guilty. Whereas on a jury trial the fate of the accused is proposed to the jury and they would decide whether he is guilty or not guilty. The jury trials provide fairness, it represents citizenship, and there is less of a bias than that of a bench trial.

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

Nowadays, many victims choose to file a suit on some insignificant cases because they think that they can win the case and gain money from it. However, each lawsuit requires not only money to hire a conscientious lawyer, but also time and efforts. To me, with efforts and high expenses, the money that the plaintiff wins afterwards does not worth

Read More
187 Words | 1 Pages

2 In recent years, mandatory sentencing laws have been introduced in NSW. Alcohol related violence mandatory sentence was introduced by the NSW government On 21 January 2014. This was introduced because of the amount of one-punch hits while intoxicated. Teens such as Thomas Kelly and Daniel Christie have been killed because intoxicated people for no reason hit them.

Read More
1083 Words | 5 Pages

Texas Felons Seeking Rights Stripped of their voting rights. Not having the right to bear arms. No opportunities at specific job fields.

Read More
1035 Words | 5 Pages

Should the Not Criminally Responsible Law Remain in Canada? As of 1992, the Canadian Criminal Justice system introduced a new Law to its Criminal Code. NCR stands for “Not Criminally Responsible.” It is defined in section 16 of the Criminal Code."

Read More
640 Words | 3 Pages

Determinate vs. Indeterminate Sentencing Sentencing is a fundamental stage in the of the criminal justice process. After the trial process is complete and the defendant has been found guilty the court will impose the penalty. The basic goals of modern sentencing are retribution, incapacitation, deterrence, rehabilitation and restoration. These goals are achieved by different sentencing practices which are indeterminate and determinate sentencing.

Read More
2057 Words | 9 Pages

Jury Systems and Racial Injustice Juries are the way we make sure trials are fair, but when your jury is biased the result of the trial are often inequitable. Today we do our best to make sure trials have impartial jurors, but this was not always the case. In the 1930’s, and a lot of other decades too, the right for African Americans to have an unbiased jury was not fulfilled. This caused many African Americans to be sentenced to death when they otherwise would not have been.

Read More
478 Words | 2 Pages

Over 300 years ago, more than 100 citizens of the colony of Massachusetts were accused of the crime of witchcraft, and many executed. Although this era in history, known as the Salem Witch Trials, lasted only mere months, its impact on the American criminal justice system has lasted until present day. Although both the trials in Salem and modern America are based on a similar justice system, there are vast differences, specifically in the rights of the defense, most notable in the separation of Church and State, the standards of evidence, and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. The modern American criminal justice system, in comparison to that of the time of the Salem Witch Trials, has changed drastically. No longer is the rule of law based on

Read More
861 Words | 4 Pages

They are also willing to come to agreements on how much the defendants are able and willing to pay the plaintiff. This is important for the reason people get nervous thinking about court and because from television that’s how we perceive court systems On the day of February 22nd around 1:30 p.m., my friends Brady, Maxx, Ethan,

Read More
539 Words | 3 Pages

The biggest issue within the Criminal Justice system is the large number of wrongful convictions, innocent people sentenced to die for crimes they did not commit. People are put in prison for years, even executed for false convictions. This affects not only those put in prison but friends and family of the accused. Wrongful convictions aren’t solely a tragedy for those directly involved either. It weakens the faith the public has for the justice system as well as poses safety issues; when innocent people are put away, the real criminals are still out there.

Read More
1479 Words | 6 Pages

This reflection paper will first address the advantages of using retributive justice approach in three court-cases. Second, it will discuss the disadvantages of using retributive justice approaches by analyzing the three court-cases listed above. Third, it will elaborate on ways that the system could have used restorative justice processes in the cases, as well as present potential outcomes that could have been reached if restoration justice was taken into consideration. First, during lecture three, we talked about the notion of just deserts.

Read More
117 Words | 1 Pages

Restorative Justice processes are likely to reduce criminals from repeating offenses, as numerous recidivism studies have demonstrated. Thus, it would be more than justified to employ restorative processes a response to crimes under

Read More

More about Statute Of Limitation

Related Topics

Open Document