ipl-logo

Stein Annotated Bibliography

268 Words2 Pages
The text and lecture offers two opposing views on influencec and contribution of Stein work in literature. The professor refutes allegation made on Stein. In one school of thought, the text criticises Stein 's work. The text states the her work had less influence than contemporaries because of her obscure style, no punctuation and no historical significance on American literature, However, professor disagrees with those points and put a cogent case. First, The text mentions that Stein 's work was obscure and hard to read. The professor disagrees with this statement and put a cogent case that most of the critics who are claiming that Stein work was cacographic, were not aware of her style and never read her luterature. Refuting to claim
Open Document