ipl-logo

Stereotypes In 12 Angry Men

1174 Words5 Pages

While watching the movie 12 Angry Men, the viewer can clearly see that the jurors are all different. The differences of the jurors is an essential part of determining a verdict. When they walk through the door the jurors can not be expected to leave all of their personal biases and personalities behind. The jurors then enter with their distinguishable personalities and biases. Juror number 10 uses a lot of stereotypes to make his decisions on whether or not the accused is really guilty or innocent. Juror 10 yells, “You said it there. I don't want any part of them, believe me” (12 Angry Men). At this point in the play he was using where the accused lived and grew up to influence his choice, he then quickly denied the fact that he is like …show more content…

Juror 3 is also a very angry man. When everyone started to change their votes to not guilty he started to get more and more angry. Juror 3 exclaims at Juror 8 when everyone changes their vote to not guilty besides him, “Listen. What's the matter with you? You're the guy. You made all the arguments. You can't turn now. A guilty man's gonna be walking the streets. A murderer. He's got to die! Stay with me” (12 Angry Men). This is best represented by the red color of the shape. Juror 3 also is very biased. Juror 3 has a son that he had stopped talking to, similar to the accused’s relationship with his father. This made him biased because he acted like his son was the kid on trial and not the actual person on trial. When Juror 3 realizes that he is alone, and once he realizes that he is making his choices because of his son, he starts to rip up a picture of his son and say that he thinks he is not guilty. This is best represented by the lighter border on the outside of the rectangle. Juror 3 also isn’t easily swayed by opinions. It took the entire movie for the jurors to convince Juror 3, he stuck by his beliefs until he realized he was wrong. This is best represented by the rectangle because rectangles are hard to turn, but the corners are rounded because his inner emotions chipped at the corners and finally made him easier to sway. Juror 3 is a static character because he changes his opinions drastically and finally realizes his

Show More
Related

Juror 3 Stubbornness Quotes

310 Words | 2 Pages

Because of this, the court's ability to reach a unanimous and just verdict is delayed. Additionally, Juror 3's stubbornness can be seen in his attitude towards the defendant's alibi which is shown when he exclaims, “You’re

Read More

Juror Eight And Juror Three In John Steinbeck's 12 Angry Men

502 Words | 3 Pages

His own son hasn’t seen him in years and he want to take out his anger on whoever he can, which just so happens to be the kid on trial. Juror Three’s feelings led him to be prejudice against the kid on trial. At the very end, he becomes visibly upset and give his final verdict, not

Read More

Analysis Of Stereotypes In 12 Angry Men

747 Words | 3 Pages

People tend to base characteristics of people pretty quickly; likewise, their personalities. Most people base their opinions on stereotypes. Reginald Rose and his play “12 Angry Men” demonstrate how people are quick to judge other people based on looks. In the movie all twelve jurors must decide if a young boy is guilty or innocent. At the beginning of the movie/play-write, only one juror, juror eight, decides the boy is innocent.

Read More

Examples Of Misidentification In 12 Angry Men

481 Words | 2 Pages

Did you know that approximately 72% of wrongful conviction involved eyewitness misidentification? In the play, “Twelve Angry Men” by Reginald Rose, The 7th Juror is very savage because he is ignorant, sassy, and he does not care. He will say anything that comes to mind without even thinking about it. From making fun of someone’s race, to calling someone an elderly, he will speak his thoughts.

Read More

Foreshadowing In 12 Angry Men

1419 Words | 6 Pages

This is also the significant emotional event for this character. Throughout the trial he takes everything very personally and even contradicts himself arguing himself into a corner at times. The man he turned his son into turns against him resulting in a fight after which his son leaves home and number three not seeing him in two years. Juror number three has a personality trait that is closely linked and reinforces his locus of control. He is hard-nosed, reluctant to change and generally cynical of anything other than what he would thought himself.

Read More

Character Differences In 12 Angry Men

1133 Words | 5 Pages

The film is all about this issue, and the question remains until the end of the play. While two characters represented in figure 1 are dynamic characters, one is static. First, Juror 3 is the complete opposite of a “static character”. This is shown when Juror 3 says, “I never saw a guiltier man in my entire life. You sat

Read More

Prejudiced Blind Us From The Truth In Twelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose

401 Words | 2 Pages

He felt as if no one should feel the way three’s son treated his father. He soon realizes this boy is not his son; he is not the one who he should feel angry and bitter towards. The play ends with juror three voting not guilty, after tearing a picture of him and his son together, then hugging the picture. This proves the central idea because his pride misrepresented the case; he shows no mercy toward the defendant, in spite of his own

Read More

Characters In William Shakespeare's Twelve Angry Men

1175 Words | 5 Pages

The “colors” contradict each other and are put against each other in their arguments causing a possible conflict between the jurors. The main color for juror eight is a light blue, to represent his logic and thoughtful demeter, which contradicts with juror threes bright red and orange/yellow callouts. Juror threes color jump out much more than the others, the bright hues jump out to your eyes and make a bold statement between the other two jurors. As for juror twelve his base shape (square) is purple, a mix between juror threes red and juror eights blue to show he's in the middle of the road betweens sides, constantly changing vote. The green in the arrows represents how he’s naive, he only really care about business and money and wanted to show off all of his successful business pitches, instead of focusing on the actual case.

Read More

Stigma In 12 Angry Men

750 Words | 3 Pages

“I’ll kill him!” (Rose 330). This is our first reactive thought to the man who signs the paper, telling us it is our dreaded time to serve jury duty. This stigma carries over to our perspective in the jury room. Twelve Angry Men is a play written by Reginald Rose in 1957.

Read More

Examples Of Social Injustice In 12 Angry Men

803 Words | 4 Pages

In 12 Angry Men, the movie begins in a courtroom where the case is being discussed by the judge, who seems fairly uninterested. The jurors are then instructed to enter the jury room to begin their deliberations. They take a vote and all but juror 8 vote guilty. The jurors react violently to the dissenting vote but ultimately decide to go around the table in hope of convincing the 8th juror.

Read More

Fallacies In 12 Angry Men

1404 Words | 6 Pages

The script introduces the viewers to the typical behavior and the state of mind of these jurors, who surprisingly turn out to be the last to change their opinions from “guilty” to “not guilty”. Juror#3 the frustrated father whose personal conflicts and experiences influence his view of the accused’s crime is very desperate to make it clear that his mind is already made up before the deliberations even start. Similar

Read More

Jurors Views In The Film '12 Angry Men'

927 Words | 4 Pages

The jurors who had been influenced by the trait were jurors all but juror eight. As the movie went on, all the jurors had explained why they had a bad view on children from the slums. Juror number three is the one who is always thinking the worst of the boys from the slums. In the end of the movie he has a picture of a boy, his son, who is from the slums and makes him upset so he is trying to take out his anger toward his own boy on the boy on trial. All the other jurors except number eight, have a bad view of the slums because of the prominence of crime in the areas of the slums and they don 't see all the kids from the slums because they just see the bad kids that come from the areas.

Read More

Twelve Angry Men's Characters In 12 Angry Men

1100 Words | 5 Pages

With color and shape comes size, and the sizes directly relate all three jurors. Juror three is definitely the biggest shape in the whole courtroom, he yells and argued through the whole case causing all the jurors to eventually chose to ignore him. But with the big picture there also another side, in the end of the movie he breaks down and shows he has a soft side, The quote , “Then, suddenly, his face contorts as if he is about to cry, and he slams his fistdown on the table,” (12 Angry Men) proves this statement. As well as the quote, “we clearly see a slip or crumpled paper on which are scribbled the words ’Not guilty,‘“ (12 Angry Men) The smaller callout inside the larger one shows that he has some humanity in him that he lets out in the end by breaking down and voting not guilty.

Read More

12 Angry Men Analysis

837 Words | 4 Pages

They stereotyped the defendant based off of his ethnicity and the neighborhood where they assumed he lived. They let their own generalizations cloud the actual facts—or lack thereof, and instead, almost had a boy sentenced to death for a crime they really were not sure he committed. With the exception of juror eleven and juror six there was not much of a difference, culturally. The two jurors that grew up in a culturally different environment became defensive regarding the stereotypes that were being spoken as facts. Although, jurors number three and ten waived the two of them off as ‘exceptions,’ and to not take their invective remarks as a personal attack.

Read More

Character Analysis: 12 Angry Men

815 Words | 4 Pages

Juror #7 is remarkably different in a way that he doesn’t care about being there at all. He flows through the whole discussion and agrees with everyone else. He is a salesman who has more important things to do than to sit on a jury. When standing at the window, he is talking to juror #6 and says, “Y 'know something? It 's hot.

Read More

More about Stereotypes In 12 Angry Men

Open Document