Steven Vail Case Analysis

447 Words2 Pages

Steven Avery and his lawyers take action upon justifying his declaration of guiltlessness. Steven asserts the officers "set him up," when he was interrogated after being told he was not a suspect. Actions taken in the investigation of Teresa's death resulted in finding an essential in Steven's residence, EDTA test being done, and log documentation of officers. Since Steven's home was inspected, a key linked to Teresa's Rav 4 was found. The device was found on a bookcase the day Sargent William Tulson did not look after the deputies. Steven's defenders suspected that these executives planted evidence. When Colbern claimed to see the key, he reported that he did not touch it when first having contact with it. He admitted to the court that he did not plant evidence and argued that it was the "first time his integrity is questioned." In an investigation report done by Colbern, the key found was not mentioned. Also, an EDTA test, an analysis …show more content…

Sargent Orth was in charge of writing a log of who had contact with the victim's vehicle. When Lieutenant Lank conducted a search in Steven's residence, he did not sign in the agenda, but he did sign out. Fassbender, a special agent, had a record of who came and left the site. When asked about this record in court, it didn’t recall to him. The officers told public media that Manitiwoc County was not involved in this case, but they were. The county's job role in this inquiry was to provide resources when they were needed. Homicide in Wisconsin was not a federal crime; it was a state crime, but Federals were still involved. Overall, Steven and his counsels dispute to convince the dock of his clean hands. After all the grounds found against him, Steven wished to testify, claiming his righteousness. At this point, Steven was up to six counts and now down to three counts. If he and his attorneys lost count one, then Steven would go to prison for the rest of his