As some people may not want to believe, Facebook is in fact a media company as Caplan states in her article, “Like it or Not, Facebook is Now a Media Company” saying that Facebook basically has a chokehold on companies, voter turnout and also controlling the opinions of users. Back in the day, people relied on newspaper articles and the news channel for their daily dose of news. But now, with the social media world booming, all the young people are drawn to Facebook. Many people don’t even pick up a newspaper or turn on the television anymore for news, but rather just using their electronic device to go to the Facebook application. As Greenberg iterates in her article, “A Stranglehold on the News Industry That’s Bad for Readers” Facebook does …show more content…
The logistics of Caplan’s article add up a lot better than Greenburg’s. Caplan grasps the topic and goes into greater detail describing and expressing to the audience the problems globally, socially and economically that Facebook as a media platform causes. She states that., “Recent research shows that Facebook has the potential to make or break companies, affect voter turnout, and control the spread of positive and negative user sentiment” (Caplan 2). Greenburg’s article informs us of the issues regarding Facebook’s control by stating, “Facebook’s outsized power is causing already strapped new organizations to invest in varied cost endeavors to appeal to Facebook’s whims” (Greenburg 2). But Caplan states that, “Recent research shows that Facebook has the potential (though maybe not intention) to make or break companies, affect voter turnout and control the spread of positive or negative user sentiment” (Caplan 2). Caplan goes into greater detail, has lots of evidence to back up her argument and incorporates ethics rather than Greenburg who just blatantly states that it is costing organizations to compete with Facebook. Caplan’s article goes into way more detail and gives many more examples to convince and persuade the reader of the logical issue. Logically speaking, ‘the public has always relied on and been affected by gatekeepers who have the power to shape public opinion” (Caplan