In my opinion, out of Stuart Mclean and the class. I believe the class was the one that told the story better for several reasons. To begin, Stuart Mclean skipped and changed a lot of the story. He didn 't start at the beginning of the story, instead he started on the second page of the book and it sounded less of a intro and more of someone talking. There were also other parts of the story Stuart Mclean skipped that i really liked. Stuart Mclean, also changed the whole ending of the story. The class were the ones that sticked to the original story we did not change the ending or skip a big part and i liked it better that way. To continue, Stuart Mclean has a fathery voice like a old man voice and when he tells the story it sounds more like he 's talking to little children. …show more content…
But, for the class we have a teenage voice that catches more of my attention and make me iterate with the story better. The class also told the story better because Stuart Mclean would add stuff that didn 't really need to be added or take out stuff i liked but as for the class we only changed a couple of words in the story. To better suit the story the words puss puss as changed to kitty kitty and cro-magnon Dave was changed to caveman Dave. Also, the part in the story were they talked about receiving a letter was changed to email which better suits are century and generation. I have to admit that when Stuart Mclean was reading his story I was a little confused for example when he was saying Stephanie 's part, the part ‘‘it 's to windy’’ said stephanie ‘‘It 's just trees’’ when he said that part it sounded like two people were talking instead of just the one stephanie. Also, at one point he changed he to she and she to he which made that part of the story a little confusing. To conclude, Stuart Mclean would take to long of pause for example, when he was reading the par about the cat hiding places around the house. I just feel like the class told the story better and i liked that version a