ipl-logo

Summary: College Athletes Should Be Paid

1114 Words5 Pages

College athletics in the United States has long been a source of pride and revenue for many universities. These athletes have profoundly impacted the world, captivating audiences worldwide and fostering a sense of unity and excitement among fans. However, the issue of whether college athletes should be paid has been a topic of heated debate. Contrary to the stance of the NCAA(National Collegiate Athletics Association), college athletes deserve compensation for their contributions to the multi-billion-dollar industry of collegiate sports, as their talents and efforts generate substantial revenue for their universities. These individuals often face financial hardships, often lack the time for part-time work and struggle with the restrictions …show more content…

These student athletes deserve to be compensated for the work they do. Events such as March Madness bring in $1 billion dollars, but almost none go to the athletes. In a Forbes article, “Why The Public Strongly Supports Paying College Athletes”, sports attorney Luke Fedlam writes, “We have seen over the last 20 years the explosion in the commercialization of college sports. Check out the NCAA March Madness tournament. So much money is being made on student-athletes’ abilities”(Fedlam). Why should athletes be restricted from earning the money they make from their skills? College athletics has long been a beacon of pride and a substantial revenue stream for so many colleges. These student athletes have profoundly impacted the world through their talents and efforts, but despite the significant contributions they have made to the multi-billion-dollar industry of collegiate sports, the debate over whether they should be compensated persists. The University of Oregon is among many institutions renowned for their athletic programs, playing a significant role in fostering school spirit. A large portion of the school attends sporting events throughout the year to support our

Show More
Related
905 Words | 4 Pages

Ryan Vanderfords’ article published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal explores this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid beyond what they receive in scholarships. Vanderford is currently a law associate at a law firm in Los Angeles, California. He played sports throughout high school and college, so the author can relate to this topic. The payment of college athletes has become a more prominent issue in today’s society then it has been in the past. He argues that at major universities, student athletes help the school generate their revenue and therefore should be paid.

Read More
1721 Words | 7 Pages

Sports reporter, Kate Murphy, succinctly summarizes an overwhelming standpoint that many people seem to cite in her article "Privilege, not a job: College athletes shouldn 't be paid. " First, she stipulates herself that student-athletes technically fit the criteria of hardworking employees. She also acknowledges that it is nearly impossible for athletes to balance a job while adhering to their strict schedules. However, because student-athletes are "living the dream" and are supposed to drink up the passion and sacrifices of their game, seeking compensation is grotesque and un-sportsman like. This argument rides on the coattails of "purity."

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

Division I Athletes Should Be Paid In college there can be a wide of activities to enjoy. Social and academic clubs, fraternities and sororities however, there is one activity very popular in universities that not only gives students a sense of unity and pride as they cheer for their home team but generates millions of dollars in revenue for the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association): college sport teams. With the popularity of college sports and the vast amount of revenue colleges are generating from these sports an argument about whether these college athletes should be given a salary has begun to surface. Tracey M DiLascio, a graduate of Boston University school of Law and a former judicial clerk in the New Jersey Superior Court, states “The NCAA estimated revenue in 2014 was nearly $1 billion, 80 to 90 percent which came from the Men’s division 1 basketball tournament” (3).

Read More
1014 Words | 5 Pages

Annotative bibliography: Should college athletes be paid? Due to National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules and regulations no college athlete is allowed to receive any compensation or endorsement while participating in college athletics. It is very problematic rules and many people and professional do not agree with these rules. Despite all the researches that suggested that NCAA the Universities makes multimillions dollars a year from college’s sport, the NCAA still insisting on applying the rule that no college athletes should be compensated about their effort and time.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

Major college football and basketball programs bring in millions of dollars a year for their university and the NCAA. Many people claim the players are the reason these programs make so much money and should be compensated for their work. At first this seems to be logical, but there are many flaws with paying athletes. However, athletes should be able to pursue business opportunities. College athletes should not be paid for playing sports, but should be able to have an outside income.

Read More
356 Words | 2 Pages

College Varsity Athletes Should be Paid In this paper, I argue that college varsity athletes should be paid for playing sports that bring in revenue. In particular, College football and basketball because they bring in the majority of the revenue for the schools. The revenue accomplished by college sports programs continues to increase, due to the growth in interest of the NCAA basketball tournament and the college football playoffs (Berry III, Page 270). Throughout the past few years, one of the main topics debated in college sports is whether or not the athletes should be paid.

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

In 2013, the NCAA made $770 million dollars from the NCAA tournament, a three week basketball tournament to determine the national champion of college basketball (D’Alessandro). Not a single player playing in this tournament did not see a single cent of this revenue. Many analysts and people in the sports business have debated on if college athletes should be paid. With the growth of collegiate sports, the NCAA should pay their athletes a percentage of their profit because the athletes are the reason why the NCAA make a profit, and college athletes have to work hard to maintain their studies and their physical fitness. This, also, could affect how many years that college players stay in college.

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

Should college athletes be paid? Annotated Bibliography Benedykiuck, Mike. “The Blue Line: College athletes should be paid.” Dailyfreepress.

Read More
1842 Words | 8 Pages

Introduction In the last couple decades there has been a stir that has arised in the presence of college sports: should college athletes be paid? There are many controversial topics and discussions that takes place when talking about whether or not college athletes should be paid? The answer to this question is very difficult and will be argued continuously for many years. It has been an idea ever since sports have existed in college. These topics have many different opinions based on people’s different backgrounds, beliefs, and economic status.

Read More
1439 Words | 6 Pages

Thesis Statement: Although paying college athletes seems unfair, it is the right thing to do because it will convince athletes to get a four year degree, they are the ones who bring money to their school, and it will teach them valuable lessons on how to manage money.  Birkenes, Adele, and Akash Bagaria. "Pay to play: Should College Athletes Be Paid?"  Current Events, a Weekly Reader publication, 6 Feb. 2012, p. 7.  Opposing Viewpoints in Context, link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A279613787/OVIC?u=avlr&xid=ddc324df.

Read More
905 Words | 4 Pages

Many college athletes go uncompensated for the fame and profits brought to the college because of their victories, and half of the well known colleges wouldn’t be as well known as they are without their sports teams, yet they still aren’t paid for their efforts. College athletes deserve a pay because not all of them paid for their tuition, many of they got into the college that they are in now because of a scholarship. Some teams are treated like employees in a large company. “Because they are already essentially paid to play, they deserve the same rights and benefits as other employees, including medical benefits, workers' compensation when injured, and the right to use their God-given talents to build some financial security for their families while still in college.”

Read More
666 Words | 3 Pages

The debate of the topic of paying student athletes, argues that these athletes currently receive scholarships, whose value in some instances, total close 200,000 over there four years. The NCAA have signed a 6,200,000,000 11-year deal giving CBS the rights to televise its men basketball championship that’s 545,000,000 a year up from 216,000,000 annually (Meshefejian 2). And college athletes don’t get any money from it. This is why college players should be

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.

Read More
723 Words | 3 Pages

Compensation for College Athletes College players should be compensated for their name, image, and likeness because the athletes generate millions if not billions of dollars only to be recompensed with a smaller window of the money they technically created. This topic is vital because college athletes make the sport popular and entertain the audience. The athletes should be rewarded more because they spend a lot of time perfecting their craft, help keep the organization generating money, and some students need the money for financial aid. Some college athletes need help to cover their daily expenses because of their difficult practice and tournament schedule.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

A growing debate in the National Collegiate Athletic Association is whether or not student athletes should be paid. The controversy began in 2011 after three hundred coaches and athletes signed a petition to pay college-level athletes, and since then other athletes have made several more arguments. The NCAA has rightfully denied all of the requests, saying they include too much. To pay student athletes could be hugely expensive for colleges, especially because they would not only pay for each athlete’s degree and equipment, but also provide a salary and give bonuses revenue for tournaments. Moreover, college athletes should not be paid because there is not enough money, it takes away a student’s focus from schoolwork, and not every athlete is guaranteed a professional career after graduating; however it is argued that it they are already paid in a way.

Read More

More about Summary: College Athletes Should Be Paid

Open Document