Summary: Military Aggression And Homeland Security

933 Words4 Pages

Historically, all Empires that have based their existence on subjugation and expansionism have collapsed. From the Roman Emperor Nero, who threw bread to the crowds, to the United States today, in which 46 million of its inhabitants rely on government food stamps. In addition, containing low-information voters, with a 14% illiteracy rate, in which six corporations control 90% of domestic consumption news.
For over half a century, a belligerent and paranoid United States has run amok through the world, causing untold misery, suffering and death to millions. From subversion to regime change and from Arab springs to invasion, the results failed to initiate peace anywhere the United States became involved. Nevertheless, and despite the cronyism …show more content…

The existence of petrodollars is one of the pillars of America’s economic might, because it creates a significant external demand for the American dollar, allowing the United States to amass enormous debts without defaulting."
This is not to say the United States hasn’t been a much-needed interventionist power on occasions and a steadfast provider of humanitarian aid. However, if survival depends on military aggression and Homeland Security protection against its own foreign policy, now is the time to bow out …show more content…

Western mass media propaganda claim China is expansionist and Russia is a threat to world peace. The excuse is that China might close international shipping lanes in the South China Islands sea dispute. Russia might invade Europe and Iran might develop a nuclear weapon. The excuses become predictions, and the predictions replace facts.
Just as the British Empire and Soviet Union collapsed, a belligerent United States is also now in a position where it can no longer police the world without consensus. Consequently, it must soon decide whether it goes to war, or accepts a significant decline in its self-appointed role and adopts power-sharing. As the United States edges ever closer to Iran, it appears that an eventual armed conflict remains the likely result.
"We’re going to take out seven countries in 5 years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran" General Wesley Clark, former Supreme Allied Commander of