Summary Of 13th By Ava Duvernay

1009 Words5 Pages

Demetrious Placido MPHILO - 101 Dr. Hassell The Law Makes People into Property The 2016 American documentary film “13th” by Ava DuVernay explores the prison-industrial complex and its connection to race, justice, and mass incarceration in the United States. The title refers to the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, adopted in 1865, which abolished slavery throughout the United States and ended involuntary servitude, except as punishment for convicted criminals. The documentary features interviews with activists, academics, politicians, and public figures, including Angela Davis, Bryan Stevenson, Michelle Alexander, Jelani Cobb, Van Jones, Newt Gingrich, Cory Booker, and Henry Louis Gates Jr. It delves into the economic …show more content…

My premises for supporting this claim is that the 13th Amendment states, “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States”. The documentary also presents evidence of systemic racism, discriminatory policies, and the disproportionate imprisonment of Black individuals. The sufficiency of the premises is compelling, but it is important to consider that whether they are sufficient depends on the individuals’ perspectives. I find it to be compelling, while others may require additional evidence. The premises complement the conclusion perfectly and are very well backed up by not only the Constitution of the United States, but also evidence from important political figures. The premises are necessary for the argument because they establish the connection between the 13th Amendment and mass incarceration while providing statistics to back the conclusion …show more content…

The premise would be how critics might argue that high crime rates justify the incarceration of individuals, regardless of racial disparities. Evidence could point to statistical data showing crime rates in specific neighborhoods or cities. A counterclaim would be that the focus should be on addressing the root causes of crime rather than relying solely on punitive measures. Another counter-argument people could use is individual responsibility. The premise would be that some may claim that individual behavior and choices lead to incarceration. The evidence backing this would be that they might highlight cases where criminal actions were directly tied to an individual’s decisions. A counterclaim would then be that structural inequalities (such as lack of education, economic opportunities, and systemic bias) play a significant role in criminal behavior. Finally, a counterargument that could be used is that there are alternative solutions. The premise would be how critics could propose alternative approaches to criminal justice. Evidence would include examples of restorative justice, community-based programs, and rehabilitation. The counterclaim would be how these alternatives prioritize rehabilitation over punishment and aim to reduce