A Prayer for Owen Meany: A Critical Analysis 1. Through the plot of A Prayer for Owen Meany, John Wheelwright’s complex relationship with his mother mirrors the dynamics shown in Psychologist Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic concept: the Oedipus complex, with his friend Owen Meany assuming the role of the father figure. John seems to be infatuated with his mother, Tabitha, often describing her in ways simply inappropriate for a child to describe their mother, such as remarking on her “lovely figure”(29). Furthermore, when Owen, who has a crush on her, describes her as having “THE BEST BREASTS”, John not only agrees but further elaborates on her beauty. Moreover, John’s attachment to his mother seems to manifest itself in unhealthy and competitive …show more content…
2. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? Is Hester Eastman the way she is by nature, or due to her upbringing? While Hester’s rather biased brother’s claim that her overly sexual behaviour is an innate quality, her cousin John Wheelwright claims it is a result of her lack of parental attention growing up in the hyper-competitive “environment” that is Sawyer Depot. Hester grew up as the youngest of three children, facing near-constant attacks on her self-esteem from her older brothers, who labelled her as promiscuous from a remarkably young age. Moreover, her parents destroyed her self-esteem through their biases relative to gender, often denying her opportunities strictly because she is a girl. For example, even though Hester proves herself to be extremely bright, even skipping a grade, her brothers attend the prestigious Gravesend Academy while she attends the local school as her parents believe girls would not benefit from a private education. As her way of protesting her family’s unfair treatment and as a sort of plea for attention, Hester embraces her so-called “sexual …show more content…
A Prayer For Owen Meany portrays the Vietnam War draft in a light which reveals issues within the lottery system for enlistment. As the government of the United States says,“ a man could qualify for a student deferment if he could show he was a full-time student” and “could continue to go to school and be deferred from service until he was too old to be drafted” (US Gov). This loophole is incredibly biased toward wealthier individuals, enabling those who can afford an education to simply avoid the draft — showing the government deems lives at a higher social status to be more valuable. Toward the end of the war, this corruption is dealt with as “draft deferments for graduate students [gets] the ax[e]” (467) — excluding students further into their degree. Unfortunately for John Wheelwright, coming from old money that would have otherwise ensured his deferment, this policy is introduced as he enters his first year of graduate school, meaning he is not exempt — ironically, had he not been held back a grade in school, he would have avoided the threat of the draft entirely. In conclusion, Irving’s portrayal of the Vietnam War highlights inherent injustices within the lottery, enabling the most wealthy to avoid enlistment