ipl-logo

Summary Of Act Of Disobedience

1822 Words8 Pages

It’s the duty of subjects from a particular niche to abide by the rules put in place by authority. Laws that are implemented in a proper manner maintain order and organization of the community. The main objectives as to why people obey the laws are to avoid the consequences that come along with breaking the laws, benefit from the course of obeying the law, and the fact that the authority is powerful and at the same time it complies with the law set in place.
Laws that require individuals to commit grossly immoral actions can be described as brutal and cannot be justified. From my perspective, it’s a gesture of cruelty to enforce such laws because they go against human rights. An individual would only abide by laws that force them to pursue …show more content…

The same argument applies to the disobedience to the authority. He further explains how the two actions; obedience and disobedience are either valuable or disadvantageous to humankind. Fromm argues that “human history began with an act of disobedience, and that it is not unlikely that it will be terminated by an act of obedience” (Fromm, p246). He adds that the two issues have both supported and created difficulties for an individual’s development. Although Fromm uses religious and mythological facts to showcase this, his work in the book demonstrates the historical injustices brought about by dictatorship and sadism. The piece mainly elaborates on the ways disobedience helps people. Fromm does state that noncompliance with the authority is not always favorable, but for the most part of his article Fromm takes into account ways disobedience has really added to the progress of the human …show more content…

Most of the leaders in this kind of circumstance are usually inexperienced and lack the moral values that someone under the same capacity is supposed to have. As a result they end up subjecting people in situations that betray the moral values and customs of society. The authorities in most cases undermine human rights and in extreme cases, they involve civilians in extrajudicial killings. Sadism encourages soldier to use rape as a weapon of war against civilians. Other areas where there is superficial training of leaders result molestation of women and

Show More
Related
270 Words | 2 Pages

The passage from Civil Obedience was express with rhetorical and stylistic devices throughout his essay. The author opinion of government is the mode which only the people have chosent to execute their will. Throughout this essay this essay explains the refusal to obey certain laws. The tone of the author seems determined.

Read More
367 Words | 2 Pages

Fromm’s In A Few Good Men In the essay, “Disobedience As A Psychological And Moral Problem”, Erich Fromm argues that disobedience is needed to achieve freedom. In other words, he also says, “Obedience to a power, institution, or authority is submission” (Fromm 685). Fromm also says to truly disobey, you must be alone and not with a crowd.

Read More
928 Words | 4 Pages

Disobedience for the most part, is seen as a bad thing. However, in some way disobedience and rebellion can help to bring a favored outcome through a situation. An issue with obeying is that if people obey something blindly it can be problematic for one’s own well-being. For people looking for change in some ways, pushing against the rules is the only way to get what they want. Although to most, disobedience can be viewed as wrong and immoral, in many cases it can be the key one needs to make progress.

Read More
1041 Words | 5 Pages

INTRODUCTION: Open your argument to the audience and give them reason to listen on. I. Hook (Opening Statement): Get your audience’s attention! Consider a quote from the story. Are there any circumstances in which the law should be ignored?

Read More
781 Words | 4 Pages

If Adam and Eve had not committed that first act of disobedience, then man as we know him today would not exist. When people are acting disobediently, they are able to rely on their own powers and become fully human. Therefore, Fromm means that disobedience is the first step into independence and freedom because an individual is breaking away from what is right and is acting in ways that he feels are appropriate. By saying that history began with an act of disobedience and will likely end with an act of

Read More
1290 Words | 6 Pages

These reasons will prevent anarchy because one has a conscience to determine which laws to follow and which ones do not; therefore, one shows loyalty to the authority of law and also loyalty to one’s

Read More
1171 Words | 5 Pages

This is conveyed well in the piece of writing as the author argued logically, used significant information of mankind disobeying and obeying, and by the use of interpreting information fairly to help convey the writer’s opinion. Summary Fromm’s essay describes how mankind began by an act of disobedience when Adam ate fruit from a forbidden tree. This

Read More
1095 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout history and into today, many groups of people have used disobedience to promote change. Some, like Oscar Wilde, believe that “disobedience… is man’s original virtue;” however, many others believe that disobedience only disrupts society and does not effectively produce change. Considering that both points of view have valid arguments, Wilde’s claim that disobedience is a virtue that promotes progress is only true to some extent. Disobedience may be one of the most readily used and effective methods for producing change in a multitude of situations, but it also has the potential for violence, and people can easily take it too far.

Read More
1245 Words | 5 Pages

The conflict between authority and disobedience has stayed relevant since Adam and Eve chose to disobey in the Garden of Eden. Since this moment, every civilization has dealt with this relationship. Egyptians faced the exodus of their Israelite slaves from their land, Romans fought with the slave Spartacus who raised an army to fight against the Roman empire, and in the eighteenth century, the French government had the challenge of its civilians revolting against their authority. The balance between authority and disobedience represents a pendulum relationship. When a pendulum swings to one side, it eventually swings to the opposite side with an equal amount of force; thus, the more authority executes its rights on a civilian, the more the

Read More
362 Words | 2 Pages

I believe that a democracy can definitely survive when people choose which laws they follow and which laws they will break, as long as it is for the purpose of liberty. Although the term civil disobedience is more frequently associated with the Civil Rights Movement, and with activists such as Martin Luther King Jr., civil disobedience has been a recurring theme throughout most of American history. An early example would be the Boston Tea Party. During the pre-Revolutionary War Era, many Americans were discontent with the fact that they had to pay taxes to Great Britain, despite having no representation in their Parliament. This “taxation without representation” would inevitably lead to the Boston Tea Party, where a large group of men boarded

Read More
93 Words | 1 Pages

Dalrymple’s purpose for writing this article was to state that there should be a distinct balance between obedience and disobedience in civilization.

Read More
870 Words | 4 Pages

Are we obligated to obey unjust laws? Laws are important because they are guidelines for a state. Without laws citizens would not know how to act and cause harm to others. Laws are aimed at common good and keep a society together and functioning.

Read More
738 Words | 3 Pages

The law may sometimes be “inconsiderate” but it keeps us in order. We may sometimes say it is harsh but it is because we are used to be “free” in a way that we do not follow rules and order. These things happen to us because we are not led by a good public official. Even the officials do not follow the law because they think they are an exemption which is not. We cannot remove the law.

Read More
1444 Words | 6 Pages

One question most people ask is, why should I obey the law? The most obvious reason is to avoid punishment, because most people are afraid of the consequences that come with disobeying the law. However, is there a moral obligation to do what the law says just because the law requires it? A discussion on what it means to be politically obligated, civil disobedience, when it’s ever justified to not obey the law and theories by philosophers will be presented. During the first 10 years of our lives, most of us were always taught to follow the rules, and listen to higher authority, otherwise we will face punishment, and as we went into our adolescent phase, we were still taught those fundamental principles, but it got to a point where following

Read More
1107 Words | 5 Pages

Law is a set of rules as to how people belonging to a certain land/country should behave. These rules determine how a person should be treated and punished if he/she commits a crime. The fear of going against the law is what keeps everyone from being vigilantes or criminals; it’s the reason as to why you can feel safe to walk with your purse in public. The law protects every citizen but the law has to also be followed or you will face prosecution. Law is the mainframe of human rights as explained in the paragraph below.

Read More

More about Summary Of Act Of Disobedience

Related Topics

Open Document