ipl-logo

Summary Of Address To New York Electors 1814

962 Words4 Pages

In the “Address to New York Electors 1814”, the Democratic-Republican members of the Legislature of New York addressed citizens with a call to future electors. The meaning of the address is to call electors in New York to vote Democratic-Republican, support the war and discourage and criticize opposition to the war. There are four main significant aspects of the address in regards to the political culture of the era. One being Democratic-Republicans supported the war and the government’s choice to be involved in it because it suited their interests. Second, it is important to note the Democratic-Republicans focused part of their argument on how the stability of the union is more important than disagreements against the government, while utilizing …show more content…

The authors claimed opposition “unnerves the aim of government” and “aids the enemy”, which is Great Britain in this case . By their statement that opposition in turn benefitted the British, the representatives called dissent as essentially against United States’ interests. The authors associate opposition as a threat to the union and thus, concludes opposition “will finally end in anarchy and rebellion” . The Democratic-Republican representatives cite European history as proof that opposition and division creates disunion, animosity and “distrust when confidence is required”. Additionally, they focus on Federalist opposition specifically and even state Federalists contradict themselves in a way that “Federalists called aloud for war and abused the government for not declaring it…but now...you are told the war is unjust” . The Hartford Convention is a prime example of the deteriorating opinion of Federalists. Even before the Hartford Convention, the minority Federalists did not hold high public opinion. Then after the Hartford Convention, Federalists were viewed to be tainted with disloyalty from their pleas to negotiate the Constitution with seven amendments and could not recover their credibility or status in the political atmosphere …show more content…

The significance of the address is centralized around the agenda of the Democratic-Republican Party to keep majority power, the ideology of unity in the States is more important than individual ability to dissent, the Federalist opposition to the party threatened American interests and the duty of Americans is to support with zeal “the struggle for freedom and independence” from their oppressors across the

Show More
Related
1221 Words | 5 Pages

When hearing George Washington’s Farewell Address for the first time it is easy to understand it is well written and the substance is things he really felt is important. However once the time is spent relating his speech to todays times and problems the magnitude of his word is really understood. Almost 250 years later and 44 more presidents, George Washington’s thoughts still apply perfectly to the current state of the U.S. So much has change sense he gave this address but unity, Stoping the divide of political parties, morality, and avoiding entangling

Read More
1254 Words | 6 Pages

Thomas Paine: Common Sense Thomas Paine writes his pamphlet during the American Revolution which served as an inspiration for the American colonists to free themselves from Britain. Paine firmly believes that independence from Britain is needed; America should be a free port and lose all ties from Britain. He reasons that the current constitution is temporary and a new one should be formed.

Read More
1135 Words | 5 Pages

The American Revolution is arguably the turning point of American history as it resulted in somewhat of a significant, positive change in politics, economics, and society as a whole. However, from 1775 to 1800, the effects of the revolution on the American society were subtle as most principles glorified by revolutionists contradicted the examples set forth by colonial reality. Perhaps most alike to revolutionary beliefs was the American economy and how it participated in free trade or encouraged the independence of hard labor. Politically, the states did apply Enlightenment and republican ideas as promised, but more often than not, the benefits of such ideas were limited to rich, land-owning, protestant, white men. This glorification of

Read More
1326 Words | 6 Pages

Countless citizens in the 1840s and 1850s, feeling a sense of mission, believed that Almighty God had “manifestly’’ destined the American people for a hemispheric career. They would spread their uplifting and ennobling democratic institutions over at least the entire continent. Land greed and ideals—“empire’’ and “liberty’’—were thus conveniently conjoined. 14. What political party cost Henry Clay the popular vote in the state of New York, & what is ironic about Polk’s election in 1844 regarding this party’s position on Texas?

Read More
887 Words | 4 Pages

The author begins by invalidating any rally for peace maintained by the loyalty of hereditary succession, saying “The whole history of England disowns the fact” (Paine 21), followed by evidence of the many civil wars fought by the English. By evaluating these facts, the reader is able to clearly see how hereditary succession does the opposite of its purpose: it establishes quarrels and thwarts peace. Paine also considers the belief that the British government is credited with American prosperity, and because of this, Great Britain will always be of necessity to America. Though Paine refutes this immediately comparing the belief to these absurd notions: “…because a child has thrived upon milk, that it is never to have meat, or that the first twenty years of our lives is to become a precedent for the nest twenty” (Paine 25). Paine even disproves the necessity of reconciliation between the colonies and Great Britain with two major points.

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

hat Most important event of 1890’s was the Panic of 1893 and the depression that followed. The realignment of American politics was one of the results of those. Democratic party deadlock politics were still restricted to white male, who turned out to the polls in great numbers. The party in deadlock[the democratic party revived quickly after the Civil War in divided the electorate almost evenly divided republicans. Usually need a party controlled both Congress and the White House, the government in Washington became less important and local and state governments became more important.

Read More
1106 Words | 5 Pages

The Constitution—the foundation of the American government—has been quintessential for the lives of the American people for over 200 years. Without this document America today would not have basic human rights, such as those stated in the Bill of Rights, which includes freedom of speech and religion. To some, the Constitution was an embodiment of the American Revolution, yet others believe that it was a betrayal of the Revolution. I personally believe that the Constitution did betray the Revolution because it did not live up to the ideals of the Revolution, and the views of the Anti-Federalists most closely embodied the “Spirit of ‘76.” During the midst of the American Revolution, authors and politicians of important documents, pamphlets, and slogans spread the basis for Revolutionary ideals and defined what is known as the “Spirit of ‘76”.

Read More
1130 Words | 5 Pages

Paine’s Common Sense is a primary document of insurmountable historic value that provides priceless insight into the minds of the colonists in the 18th century. Common Sense includes many compelling arguments, but there is one overarching point Paine attempts to convey; “First, that it is the interest of America to be separated from Britain.” Paine’s core belief in his article is that it’s in the best interest of Americans, having struggled its way through over a hundred years of turmoil to establish a functioning society, to detach themselves from the British monarchical system. They had operated under Britain’s rule for the past 170 years, back to the establishment of Jamestown in 1607, and it was high time to revisit the state of America’s current affairs with some new perspective. According to Paine, the British constitution had numerous flaws, so he wrote Common Sense to refute the

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

William Novak presents an argument on how the history of American government has been told upside-down for many years now. Novak depicts a mighty American state, capable of a great deal and responsible for some of the most important narratives in American history. However, there were many people, of whom had great interest in the founding fathers, were irritated by Novak’s argument. The main group of people being referred to here were people from the Tea Party political movement.

Read More
121 Words | 1 Pages

George Clinton, Samuel Adams, Luther Martin, Richard Henry Lee, and Patrick Henry who were a part of the American Revolution, rejected the Convention in Philadelphia because they did not agree with its objectives. They were convinced that it threatened the “core principles” of the revolutionary heritage. The government regulated by the new Constitution and its democracy were less likely to thrive in small towns because people would not vote directly for their senators or their president, and radical egalitarianism did not have the opportunity to develop under the enhanced central state. Anti-Federalists actually exposed a wide range of ideas and theories; some aimed at reducing federal power, while others asked for the restrictions of that

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

Strong, long lasting unions are built from the determination and respect of the people; individualism takes a sole part in the United States government and has it has shaped our world today. When the United States of America was born, myriads of people migrated to this land in search of a better life- the only problem was how the country itself were to be run. People from across the world carrying different opinions, religions, memories, and backgrounds provided various outcomes for how the big picture for America would look. The people were attempting to form a government based off of their own human rights (and other aspects in balancing the federal government), but still looked for a form of structure to uphold this new form of free land.

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

This fight or flight attitude is reactionary and exemplifies the stubbornness of the English crown to entertain our demands. All we ask is for no taxation without representation, and although Johnson argues that taxation not in itself tyranny, this is contradicted by the definition of tyranny as cruel and oppressive government that does not represent the will of the people it governs. Although Johnson holds firmly to his, perhaps delusional, belief that American resistance is futile under British naval power, he might be surprised to learn how well we can navigate our native and rough terrain unlike that of the motherland and he perhaps underestimates the spirit of the colonies and our commitment to win our just liberties, whether that victory be won, preferably through logic, but nonetheless through insurrection if

Read More
521 Words | 3 Pages

If this be not the case, there will be a constant clashing of opinions” (Brutus). Anti-Federalists believed that interest groups in a large republic made governing impossible. In contrast to this belief, competition among interest groups makes successful governing possible by allowing people with differing ideas to voice their opinions, and by allowing compromise within government decisions to be made. Governments with competing interest groups are successful because, as a member, citizens’ voices can be

Read More
491 Words | 2 Pages

In January of 1941, seventy-five years ago this year, Franklin Delano Roosevelt delivered a State of the Union address to the joint houses of the U.S. Congress. This speech, delivered on the eve of our entry into World War II, is remarkable for both its content and its intent. It came to be known as

Read More
1540 Words | 7 Pages

The Articles of Confederation, the new nation’s first form of government, were a nightmare for those who advocated a strong national government. On the other hand, those who opposed strong national government, mainly state legislators, thought that the Articles of Confederation were exactly what the new nation needed. This created a rift that is still noticeable within the United States today in the form of partisan politics. Irving hints at this separation in our government when “Another short but busy little man pulled [Rip] by the arm, and raising on tiptoe, inquired in his ear, ‘whether he was Federal or Democrat’” (479). Although Irving does not go into detail about the viewpoints of Federalists and Democrats, this is still one issue that arose in post-revolution life.

Read More

More about Summary Of Address To New York Electors 1814

Related Topics

Open Document