Annotated Bibliography Boulton, Alexander O. "American Paradox: Jeffersonian Equality and Racial Science." American Quarterly 47.3 (1995): 467-92. JSTOR. Web. 29 Sept. 2014. In this source, Boulton analyzes how parts of the Declaration of Independence contradict Jefferson’s “scientific racism” presented in the Notes on the State of Virginia. He affirms, “The scientific theories that Jefferson sets out in the Notes on the State of Virginia are crucial to understanding his construction of both equality and race” (472). Specifically, Boulton’s insight on Jefferson’s emancipation plan showed Jefferson sought for colonization after emancipation because of this “scientific racism”. He believes that Jefferson thought, “… that a plan to end slavery …show more content…
He covers various topics, but the one of most interest in relation to the topic Thomas Jefferson and his opinions on slavery is the section in which he directly addresses that issue. In the brief excerpt, Jefferson details the physical and morals differences between African Americans and Caucasians. Numerously throughout the document, he refers to them as inferior race with the difference between the two races, “fixed in nature” (669). With, “the improvement of the black in body and mind, in the first instance of their mixture with the whites, has been observed by everyone, and proves that their inferiority is not the effect merely of their condition of life” (671). This document as indicated in the footnotes was originally published privately, so therefore one can conclude that his true reflections on African Americans and slavery are presented in this source. All in all, this will be extremely useful in introducing specific direct quotations about Jefferson’s ideals on African Americans as a …show more content…
Notes on the State of Virginia is Magnis’s basis for the exploration into Thomas Jefferson’s thinking; he uses this document as well as several letters between Jefferson and correspondents to establish his main point and organize his argument. In summary, his argument is Thomas Jefferson felt that African Americans were an inferior race physically and intellectually, and these feelings were translated into his political conduct. For example, he discussed thoroughly Jefferson’s emancipation plan to free the slaves in infancy over a 25 year time period while deporting them back to Africa to colonize there. This will leave the whites free on the inferior race, because Jefferson believed the two races could not govern together. Other examples include: his inaction of abolition plans during his time in office, his scientific opinion on African Americans, and his deprecation of African American’s intellectual capabilities. Magnis concludes his article with this line, “It is abundantly clear that Jefferson intended the United States to be a society of free White men because of his overwhelming prejudice toward Black, who he regarded as inferior in body and mind” (508). All of these analyses will provide usefulness in my paper, as they concede with my
Hi Anecia, Your viewpoints on Benjamin Banneker exposed several of valuable details, one for example Banneker rhetorical strategy was effective yes, I agree with this statement about Banneker, in other words, he was letting Franklin Jefferson know that there were African Americans who possessed intelligence. Otherwise his ability to complete an almanac would be impossible. However, I find it hard to conceive that out of all the hundreds and hundreds of slave Jefferson purchased and kept in slavery until his death; not one indicated traits of intelligence. Therefore can one assume that Jefferson’s letter written true purpose was to keep slavery going because of his economic status was at the state or to introduce the negativity of a race
Benjamin Banneker hopes to bring the horrors of slavery to Thomas Jefferson’s attention and potentially end slavery. He accomplishes this with his logical organization of his essay, appeals to pathos and ethos, comparisons, flattery, positive and negative diction, allusions, examples, parallelism, and a call-to-action. Banneker respectfully reminds Thomas Jefferson of how horrible it was under Great Britain’s “tyranny” and compares this to slavery. By comparing the suffering in slavery to the suffering the U.S. endured under Great Britain. Banneker addresses Thomas Jefferson as “sir” and compliments him, building him up.
The year is 1791. A time of immense controversy over the ownership of slaves divided the country. During this time Benjamin Banneker writes to the Declaration’s framer Thomas Jefferson on his outrage on this issue. With great effectiveness, Banneker uses rhetorical strategies of emotional appeal and contrasting the men’s two lives to argue his stand on slavery.
In Benjamin Banneker’s “Letter To Thomas Jefferson” he argues against slavery and proves himself to be an advocate for the abolishment of slavery. Banneker begins the letter by admitting to Thomas Jefferson that the world generally views African-Americans as rather “brutish than human, and scarcely capable of mental endowments”. In other words, Banneker points out to Thomas Jefferson that African-Americans were looked at as dumb savages so to speak. Basically, the point Banneker makes is that African-Americans were seen as something simply sub-human. Meaning we weren’t people in the eyes of caucasian society; we were nothing more than creatures.
Banneker pointed out how “pitiable” Jefferson was being that he was fully convinced of the “benevolence of the Father.” Yet he was okay with the “impartial distribution of rights.” The message that Banneker was trying to get across was that if Jefferson believed that God gave out his rights, he should not have been enslaving the blacks. Banneker also made a reference to the “narrow prejudices” that Britain left on the colonist. If Jefferson did want the colonies to prosper, then he (i.e. the new government) should have given the blacks the freedom they wanted, instead of acting as King George to the new country.
Benjamin Banneker, an educated son of former slaves, wrote a strongly worded letter to Thomas Jefferson in which he argued the possession and oppression of slaves. With the use of tone, allusion, and parallelism; Banneker criticized the Secretary of State and framer of the Declaration of Independence for his hypocrisy and condemned him with the purpose of awakening his morals and bringing an end to this violation of life and liberty. Throughout this letter Banneker assesses the situation with a respectful, yet accusatory tone. He only addresses to Jefferson as “sir” which shows a sign of respect for Jefferson`s position, but this does not stop Banneker from condemning Jefferson for his role in slavery.
In "Jefferson & The Problem of Slavery", Takaki explains how despite Jefferson opposing slavery, he did not believe the races where equal. He wanted to send Africans away, but believed just sending all of them away would be impractical and expensive. So instead, he wanted to take children away from their slave parents, assimilate them, then send them to another country. One example of his views on slaver in general was that Jefferson claimed he felt guilty about owning slaves, and said he'd free them once his debt was gone. Despite the fact he felt guilty, he believed that his race, Caucasians, were superior to the Africans.
The repetitive use of pronouns and satire are utilized in order to question the credibility and motives behind Jefferson’s actions, thus creating a demanding tone. In order to appeal to Jefferson’s emotions, personification and allusions are utilized to establish guilt for not adhering to his statements. Through Banneker’s letter, not only was his efforts successful in attracting attention to slavery, but it urged other advocates to fight for equality as
In the editorial Merit Based Immigration Sounds Nice, But Who Deserves the Most Merit, John Carson asserts that the concept of merit based immigration, while justified, has several areas that need clearer guidelines. The author begins by giving unbiased background information on the issue, and why this merit is an arbitrary subject. Moving forward, Carson illustrates how from the founding of the nation, “merit [has been used] to justify inequality,” (Carson). In his passage the author, continuously displays the ways merit can be used in favor of certain groups, and how those in power later choose to extend human rights to. John Carson, believes that since the founding of the nation, “merit is employed as a way of unequal doling out limited resources,” (Carson).
He fights for laws to abolish slavery in the North, yet wants it to continue in the South, he writes letters to his friends lamenting the institution of slavery, yet publicly agrees that there is indeed a need for slavery in America. Early in his life, when he practiced law, Jefferson fought the famous case where he defended a slave, and when his client lost the case, he offered him money, which presumably helped him escape. Jefferson may have advocated strongly for the freedom of slaves in his early years, and he may have written the famous line, ‘all men are created equal’ but that does not mean that he believed that African Americans were equal to the white Americans. His proclamation only stands for European and American people. He believed that African Americans were inferior to the Europeans and they could not be freed, otherwise they would create havoc that would be impossible to solve.
Banneker’s goal is to connect with Jefferson. He wants Jefferson to realize that he himself worked hard to obtain the rights naturally entitled to all humans by God which were once taken away from him and all of America. However, he is taking away these very rights from Banneker’s “brethren”, the African Americans. In his letter, Benjamin Banneker begins by describing the historical context of how America was able to escape the tyranny of Britain. Banneker utilizes America’s freedom from Britain to show that the “tranquility that exists is only due to a blessing.”
In multiple letters and notes he wrote he expressed his guilt for the slaves and once the slaves paid off their debt and Jefferson’s he hoped to free them. Jefferson and his slaves remained in debt until the day he died. Jefferson believed that slavery not only deprived blacks of their liberty but had an “unhappy” influence on the masters and their children (Takaki 63). If a master is constantly punishing a slave and cannot restrain, the child’s master will imitate and master it, resulting in a nonstop cycle of slavery.
In his letter to Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Banneker cries out against slavery and how Thomas Jefferson seemed to have forgotten the slaves when he was writing the Declaration of Independence. With his use of religious connotation, repetition and references to Jefferson’s own past Banneker channels his feelings of negativity against slavery to Jefferson. Banneker knows that Jefferson is a religious man as most men were back in the day and by bring God in to his arguments he shows Jefferson that god too, is against slavery. He writes that Jefferson is “convinced of the benevolence of the Father” and that Jefferson “counteracts his mercies” by allowing slavery to go on. Jefferson is just not getting the picture from God that Slavery is not a good thing.
Benjamin Banneker is a very passionate man when it comes to racial issues. In fact, he, himself was the son of a slave, which would indicate that he was a man who has experienced racial complications. Banneker (once educated), decided to become an advocate for racial freedom and equality. Subsequently Banneker wrote a letter to Thomas Jefferson in hopes of persuading him to rethink the government’s position on slavery. In the letter Banneker uses allusions, repetition, and religious diction in his writing in hopes to evoke a change in the hypocrisy the colonists’ government has proven to be.
As a young country, the United States was a land of prejudice and discrimination. Wanting to grow their country, white Americans did what they had to in order to make sure that they were always on top, and that they were always the superior race. It did not matter who got hurt along the way because everything that they did was eventually justified by their thinking that all other races were inferior to them. A Different Mirror by Ronald Takaki describes the prejudice and discrimination against African Americans and Native Americans in the early history of the United States.