ipl-logo

Summary Of Apostles Of Disunion By Charles B. Dew

592 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay on north and south slavery

The book that I read was the Apostles of Disunion by Charles B. Dew. This book explains the action of secession commissioners who were given the assignment to travel throughout the South and to other slave states in the years 1860 and 1861. Eventually, their efforts were for not because those men were found guilty of recruiting people to follow secessionary ideals as well as supporting secessionary ideals. I think Dew is trying to get his main point across that people are mistaken if they think that the preservation of slavery in the south was not the primary ideal that lead to the secession and Civil War. I think that he tries to explain through most of the information given to us that states rights may have sparked the secession and civil war but it …show more content…

The Declaration of Immediate Causes stated that, “the North has encouraged as well as assisted thousands of southern slaves to leave their homes “(pg.12). That same declaration states that ‘”Lincoln’s inauguration means that the republican party will take sole possession of the government, the south will be excluded from the common territory, and war must be waged against slavery until is shall cease throughout the United States” (pg. 12). In my opinion, the most important evidence that Dew uses to describe his point or stance to the reader was the letter written by Stephen F. Hale. Dew explains that the letter caught his eye as he read it from start to finish. Hale stated that “Republican victory was nothing less than an open declaration of war, for the triumph of this new theory of government destroys the property of the South, lays waste her fields, to assassinations and her wives and daughters to pollution and violation to gratify the lust of half-civilized African’s” (Pg. 54). He also stated that the letter surprised him with the rhetoric the Hale

Show More
Related
861 Words | 4 Pages

He teaches the reader about a couple of the most important battles and generals of the civil war. Instead of being a plain research book about the civil war, he gives us accounts of true yet hilarious events during the civil war, such as a soldier rushing into battle with half of his hair shaved because he couldn’t finish his haircut. Or even about the time opposing soldiers did not fight and instead met at a river to trade goods like newspaper, tobacco, and card in makeshift boats. Steve Sheinkin explains the Civil war in simple, perhaps oversimplified tales and fact. This, however, does not take away the depth of the book, fully going into slavery and the impact of cotton, he does his part in explaining the Civil War.

Read More
595 Words | 3 Pages

The fate of their country by Michael Holt is a book made up of 3 to 4 sections, titled  Pandora's Box, The Wilmot Proviso, The Compromise of 1850, The Kansas-Nebraska Act. Author Michael Holt examines what caused the Civil War and the Pandora’s Box of sectional dissent territorial slavery issue over slavery into all current and future western territories also the Missouri crisis debate. It wasn’t slavery per the book but the debates about the extension of slavery into new territories and states that sent the nation careening into civil war, argues writer Michael Holt. He gives his readers an analysis of the partisan political forces, on the great debate over the extension of slavery into the American West.

Read More
204 Words | 1 Pages

Some Southerners believed that they needed to secede from the nation because they believed Abraham Lincoln, and his Republican majority were a major threat to the institution of slavery. The new Republican Party showed up in the 1850s and they were against the institution of slavery. When the election of 1860 came about, one of the candidates was Abraham Lincoln who just so happened to be a republican. When he won the election alongside his commanding majorities in both houses of Congress, the Southern states panicked, and got afraid that the federal government would stop the continuation of the practice of slavery. In other words, they were afraid that they were going to abolish slavery in the South, which they believed was going to be a problem

Read More
370 Words | 2 Pages

Chapter One Q: How did Union Commanders and President Lincoln characterize the “Nature of the Rebellion?” In regards to the nature of the rebellion, many Northerners, Republicans, and Union Commanders strongly believed in the theory that the South had been hoodwinked into secession by a wealthy slaveholding handful of upper class men which they referred to as the Slave Power Conspiracy. In addition, Southerners didn’t have much of a choice in the decision to the leave the union and accepted it as a fait accompli engineered by their social betters. Moreover, President Lincoln stated that “it may be well doubted whether there is, today, a majority of the legally qualified voters of any State, in favor of disunion.”

Read More
771 Words | 4 Pages

While he writes about the events after they happened, his experience and detail involved in the book make up that. This book provides a greater understanding of the civil war from a side that is not usually written about. Overall, understanding of the civil war is expanded after reading this book. So it stands not just as a good source for information but also a primary source because of the author’s perspective. The confederate side of the story is silenced often because they lost.

Read More
1024 Words | 5 Pages

“The lack of… nationality, I believe, is one of the great evils of the times…” Senator John Sherman stated on February 10, 1863. The United States had been split into sections from the beginning, and it created a lack of unity and togetherness. In Document A, the reader can acquire from the reading that South Carolina (and later many other states) seceded from the Union because of states’ rights. Document A states that an amendment (specifically the

Read More
940 Words | 4 Pages

At that time, tensions between the North and South were high over issues such as states' rights and the expansion of slavery into new territories. In his essay, De Bow sought to defend the institution of slavery and counter criticisms of the system. This was a common argument among pro-slavery advocates in the South at the time, as they saw the institution as essential to their way of life and economic prosperity. Olsen's book, "The American Civil War: A Hands on History," provides additional context for understanding De Bow's essay. The book explores the economic, social, and political factors that contributed to the outbreak of the Civil War, including the sectional tensions between the North and South, the rise of abolitionism, and the impact of slavery on American society.

Read More
828 Words | 4 Pages

The southern secession from the Union increased pressure between the South (Confederacy) and the North (Union). The South’s attempts on withdrawal proved the fact that the South and the North were destined to fall apart after growing tensions between the two sides. For years, historians have been debating the point if the South had the right to secede from the Union. While some historians argue that the South could leave due to legality, others claim that it is a breaking the Constitutional Oath that the states would stay together. The secession of the Confederacy was a primary cause of the civil war.

Read More
386 Words | 2 Pages

South vs North The south thought they could do what they wanted .Before the Civil War the South depended on slavery and the North was more of a Industrial. Then there were arguments about slavery should not be in the new states .People came up with compromises to fix all the fuss of which state is free and which state is a slave one.

Read More
1142 Words | 5 Pages

Daniel Webster tried to get the two sides to compromise and stay together, telling the North to let slavery stay in the south and telling the South that if they secede there will be war (Document 4). Secession was never the right answer if the Union was to be maintained. It destroyed the point of compromise and created the Civil War. When the South seceded, compromise was no longer able to help the union stay

Read More
583 Words | 3 Pages

Americans reacted to the secession crisis In 1850 Augusta County in Virginia were staunchly loyal to the Union, shifted loyalty late in the secession crisis of 1860 and 1861. Comparing local reactions to national politics with local views on the nature and unity of political communities more generally moves the decision to secede in April 1861. Cochran talks about the growing anxiety and uncertainty surrounding South Carolina's threat of secession and evaluates the South's readiness for a war and state of his financials as well as the health of his family (Augusta County: John H. Cochran to His Mother, December 11, 1860). He also enclosed letters detailing the state of the soldiers condition to the senate.

Read More
553 Words | 3 Pages

Before the southern secession, there were conflicts between the North and the South due to slavery. Southerners did not want slavery to end, while the North wanted it abolished. They thought slavery was a right and a necessary evil. In a message to congress, James Buchanan stated that “Congress can contribute much to avert [Southern withdrawal from the Union] by proposing…the remedy for existing evils…an ‘explanatory amendment’ of the Constitution on the subject of slavery” (Buchanan 1860). The South wanted to be left alone, they wanted to continue with slavery.

Read More
1451 Words | 6 Pages

‘Slavery was the root cause of secession’. ‘November 6 1860, Lincoln was elected president of America which resulted in panic emerging in the South’ . The election of Lincoln as president who was a Republican leader meant that ideologies, movements and values from the North would be implemented in the South which meant the abolition of slavery. Slavery was a huge characteristic of the South as the economy; politics; social status and psychological mind-sets were influenced by the process of slavery. The southern white population then derived the idea of secession which meant the South would gain independence from Northern aggression .

Read More
497 Words | 2 Pages

Chapter one of the Acts of the Apostles begins with the resurrected Jesus shortly before his ascension into heaven as he speaks to the eleven apostles about what is to come during their journey to spread His word. The eleven apostles listen to Jesus; Matthias becomes the twelfth apostle, replacing Judas after his betrayal. In chapter two, Peter preaches to the people and gains many followers after the Holy Spirit fills the apostles and makes them each speak a language different from the next. In chapter three, Peter and John heal a man in the temple. Peter tells those who witness the event to repent for thinking Peter and John heal the man alone, instead of through God.

Read More
307 Words | 2 Pages

Wars stem from pride. Whether if it’s to expand, secede or defend, it all stems from pride. Pride for one’s country (nationalism), culture and way of life. In the case of the Civil War it was fought to protect the Southern way of life. This was agriculture and free labor.

Read More

More about Summary Of Apostles Of Disunion By Charles B. Dew

Related Topics

Open Document