Summary Of Bag Ban Bad For Freedom And Environment

In the article “Bag Ban Bad for Freedom and Environment” by Adam B. Summers, Summers writes to the public to inform how the ban of plastic bags in California is unnecessary because plastic bags are a small percent of the carbon footprint left on the planet. Summers uses different methods to support his claim. Summers uses statistics, expert opinions, and examples to support his claim. ADD MORE

The first method Summers uses is statistics. One example of stats is displayed when Summers is talking about the percentage of solid waste that is caused by plastic bags. “Plastic bags, sacks, and wraps of all kind make up only about 1.6 percent of all municipal solid waste materials”. This shows the perspective of how little plastic impacts the earth compared to everything else. Another example of stats is when Summers is talking about how plastic bags require less energy and water to make, “Plastic bags require 70 percent less energy to make, generate 80 percent less waste, and utilize less than 4 percent of the amount of water needed to manufacture them.”. This information puts the impact of plastic bags into perspective to other materials and supports Summers claim because

One example of this is when Summers is talking about the different professors from different universities, “A November 2012 statistical analysis by the university of pennsylvania law professor Jonathan Klick…”. Including this professor's opinion makes Summers claim more reliable. Another example is when Summers includes the U.S Environmental Protection Agency’s information about plastic only making up 1.6 percent of solid waste, “According to the U.S Environmental Protection Agency, plastic bags make up only 1.6 percent…”. Including a reliable source makes the information in his article more reliable. When Summers uses an expert’s opinions/ reliable sources, it backs up what he is telling and makes the information he is telling more