President Barack Obama’s State of the Union Address uses stories to develop an emotional connection with the audience and stakeholders, demonstrating a sense of passion similar to Orwell. In the essay, “Why I Write”, Orwell depicts his motive for writing as a passion for political purpose, similarly Obama uses politics to become the dominating theme of the address. However, each individual is fueled by a separate reasoning for the shared admiration of political writing. George Orwell choses to write political novels due the experiences he has encountered as demonstrated when he writes, “This increased my natural hatred of authority and made me fully aware of the existence of working classes…understanding of the nature of imperialism…”(Orwell …show more content…
George Orwell’s use of a personal encounter allows the reader to understand the effects that the environment and personal experiences impose upon an individual. As a result a cohesive explanation and reason for his political purpose is given to the reader, permitting a connection to manifest with the author. The emotional appeal that is constructed through the use of real life situations, allows an audience to acquire a sense of passion in addition to becoming sympathetic. In the state of the Union Address, Barack Obama uses current issues to stimulate the audience and declare a motion for political change, as he states, “We have to reduce the influence of money in our politics…We’ve got to make it easier to vote, not harder. We need to modernize it for the way we live now. This is America: We want to make it easier for people to participate” (Obama 8). By introducing a problem with politics despite being a politician, Obama establishes a sense of trust. The use of the word “reduce” insinuates prior and prominent issues with regards to the role money plays in