In the essay ‘Consider the Lobster’ by David Foster Wallace, a composition about ethics and regards to animal abuse is opened up. Much like minorities found in America, lobsters are considered to be the lowest level of the animal society. The biggest point he is trying to get out is about the essay is to knowledge people about the issues of torturing animals just for the sake of our humility and pleasure. What is honestly socially acceptable as normal behavior is not always the most ethical or moral behavior. In the beginning of the essay the author describes an recurring holiday in Maine, the Lobster Festival. The festival is self-explanatory in that people from all over the area gather to indulge in immense amounts of lobsters. While this part of the festival is rudimentary, a second part about the festival raises the need for concern. A cook comes to the festival and literally boils lobsters live in front of the entire audience. It’s easy to shrug off because it’s just a lobster, right? Wallace even says what lobsters are by definition. The main point about that quote is that unlike dogs or cats that serve as typical house pets, lobsters do little to nothing to help contribute in any way other than as food. People are so quick to immediately defend the murdering of animals to eat, but a majority of Americans fail to see the moral issues …show more content…
Is life simply defined by how something sits on the food chain, or rather how that organism enjoys life. There is a video that showcases a woman who cannot walk because of a medical condition, but refers to her daily strolls in her wheel chair as, “walks.” Much like the life of lobsters, is walking only defined by the definition of the word, or instead the experience the person has. Society has seemed to forget the fact that all life is created equal and by no means does that exclude