Scott Turow is the author of The Ultimate Punishment: A Lawyer's Reflections on dealing with the Death Penalty, published in 2003. Turow has written a series of nonfiction books reflecting current affairs and the legal system. Most importantly, is that Turow is an attorney who has prosecuted as well as defended clients in death penalty cases (Turow,2003). Turow describes his experience with death penalty cases and his work examining the death penalty process, while not precisely a supporter or detractor of the death penalty, his reflections are discussed in his work.
In his article “To Kill or Not to Kill”, Scott Turow tries to convince the audience advocating the capital-punishment system in Illinois to inspect its fairness and efficacy. He tackles this issue because he provides that the system is defective. Even though he goes back and forth from favoring the capital punishment issue to rejecting it, he clearly states his penalty opposition, supporting it with powerful examples, factual data, and a metaphor. To appear moral, credible, and knowledgeable, the author uses his scholarly tone, demonstrating his respectable position. He, as a lawyer and “one… members of a commission appointed by Governor”, had to present his position on the law during the reforms of the capital punishment system in Illinois.
Edward Koch make it clear that he believes that capital punishment can prevent homicides: “Had the death penalty been a real possibility in the minds of these murderers, they might well have stayed their hands” (484). Koch tries to convince his reader that a strict punishment like the death penalty will definitely force people to think twice before they murder another human being. Koch uses evidence like the murder rate and cases where criminals committed multiple murders to support his defense for capital punishment, and uses the statistics to show how necessary capital punishment is necessary in the United States (485-86). This essay is directed at U.S. citizens how can be persuaded to support or have not yet formed an opinion on capital punishment, so the death penalty can gain supporters and be fully incorporated into the law. He also states that by making murderers pay with their lives, capital punishment makes the value of human life at a higher level (487).
David B. Muhlhausen wrote an article “How the death penalty saves lives,” With a heading of “Capital punishment curbs criminal behavior and promotes a safer country.” Muhlhausen talks about a man named Earl Ringo Jr, his purpose was to bring the question ‘How does the death penalty saves lives,’ into people's minds. The date of this article is Sept. 29, 2014, Muhlhausen works for US New and World Report. Muhlhausen informs ages 10 and up in this article because death penalty might be a little too harsh for little kids who still do not even know what death is yet. Therefor, Muhlhausen also states examples of how the death penalty can save lives.
Common Assignment “All that the progressives ask or desire is permission- an era when development, evolution, is the scientific word- to interpret the Constitution according to the Darwinian principle; all they ask is recognition of the fact that the nation is a living thing and not a machine,” Woodrow Wilson said that when he was in office. He is trying to get the word out to the press, who are bashing against the progressives. The progressive era was a time where the United States was coming to the peak of the times. The country began to industrialize with urbanization, agriculture, and the economy. Joseph Huthmacher, George Mowry, and Robert H. Wiebe all talked differently about the progressives, and held different reforms.
“An eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot” said the Bible about justice but it also says “You shall not murder,” so is morally accepted the murder to a murderer? The topic in discussion is whether should the death penalty be banned or allowed, if taking the life of a criminal is a necessary punishment. The article of The Editors "Ban the Death Penalty” is based on facts and analysis about how the death penalty is not proved to deter crimes. However, Adrianne Haslet-Davis’s article, "Why the Death Penalty Should Live" does not sustain her thoughts with information. Furthermore, The Editor advocated their article with information of the possible consequences of this punishment to show better their point when Haslet-Davis just shares her experience and beliefs missing to provide specific data.
Annotated Bibliography Draft Student name : Haider Zafaryab Student number: 2360526 Thesis Statement : Capital Punishment is a very controversial topic around the globe. I believe that it does more harm than good and breeds violence in society. Source 1: Radelet, M. L., & Akers, R. L. (1996).
Death Penalty: Pre-AP 9 Ethically we often argue the Death Penalty and most see it as a sin however, picture this, a man is convicted of mass murder after burning 12 kindergarteners alive and, injuring 4 for life. Do you think he deserves only a life in prison? This is a real story about a man named Bai Ningyang who did just that. He was convicted of murder and was sentenced to death and rightfully so: the death penalty is justified thru a website called ProDeathPenalty.com and using Lesson Before Dying a fiction novel.
Capital Punishment has been one of the most highly debated topics of all time. Many argue whether The United States government, or any government for that matter should have the ability to take someone 's life. Knowing this capital punishment is the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime. It is currently ranked with gun control and abortion as one of the most controversial issues in America. Many issues regarding its controversy include racial bias and morality.
Angela Davis, in her researched book, Are Prisons Obsolete? , analyzes the perception of our American prison systems. Davis’ purpose is to inform the reader about the American prison system and how it effects African- Americans and those of any other race, though blacks are the highest ranking number in the prison systems. She creates a blunt tone in order to easily convey her message without bias. Davis opens her researched book by addressing the idea of how abolishing the death sentence and the prison system itself, by claiming that even advocates for the death penalty find that they face challenges dealing with this issues also.
Henry Louis Mencken argues the two most commonly heard arguments against capital punishment in his essay “The Penalty of Death”. Mencken believes that the death penalty is a form of “katharsis” for the immediate victims of the crime. Katharsis being a release of healthy steam. He states that criminal punishment is not solely for deterring other criminals of similar crime, but to give a peace of mind to the society that has been wronged. Mencken also argues the complaint of “that of a hangman is a dreadful business” (463).
Since ancient times the legal thought regarded the concept of death penalty as a measure necessary to protect fundamental values of the society. Along with the development of a state, state judicial system and regulations were developed as well, creating a two-fold purpose of the criminal law: punishment of a criminal and intimidation of population in order to prevent further possible crime commitment. These two initial positions are still present in the criminal law today and constitute the eternal debate around the topic of “for and against death penalty”. In this essay, I would like to briefly describe the two current positions along with the arguments and afterwards express my own opinion in that matter.
The history of capital punishment in America can be traced as far back as the early 17th century when George Kendall of Virginia was executed in 1608 for allegedly committing treason. Daniel Frank, also from Virginia, was executed in 1622 for theft. Whereas some English colonies (Virginia, Massachusetts, New York) were parochial in their application of the death penalty for crimes ranging from murder, sodomy, burglary, arson, rape and treason, others (South Jersey, Pennsylvania) were less so. By 1776, most of the colonies had roughly comparable death statutes with hanging being the usual sentence. Not until the Italian jurist Cesare Beccaria published On Crimes and Punishment in 1767 did the reform movement gain strength.
The audience feels in confidence and connected with the author which makes it an effective use of the appeal of
When American colonists fought for and won independence, they accepted England's laws, including capital punishment. Since then, England and our other close allies have abandoned the process of putting criminals to death. We are, however, allied with Russia, China, Libya, Iran, Cuba, Chile and Saudi Arabia in the use of capital punishment. The way in which we legally put criminals to death has changed frequently since colonial times in the interest of executing human beings in a more, "civilized manner. " Hanging and firing squads were most widely used until the electric chair was invented in 1890.
