It was once explored by Descartes that there are two worlds: the external world of the sensible and the internal world of the mind. While he claims that the mind is a truth that cannot be unreasonable doubted under the notion that “I think, therefore I am”, he is more skeptic with about the external world. This was first shown in his Dream Argument, where he argued that the external world could be doubted as it could be possible that everything people are able to sense are in fact an illusion brought to them by a dream. This is the problem of external world skepticism, being unable to tell if anything outside the mind is real. Descartes attempted to solve this in Meditation VI where he stated that his sense impression was the result of material objects due to being vivid and clear ideas. As such, it allows for people to distinguish between something that is imagined based of the material objects and something that is understood. However, Descartes’s states on the issue doesn’t seem as well put together. …show more content…
As an idealist, he believed that the only thing that exist were the mind and the ideas from them. When explaining how people are able to sense objects, Berkeley stated is believed to be a sensible thing is only a perception that was created by the mind and shared by others. He doesn’t argue that objects of experience do not exist, but that they do not exist within the context of matter. His argument states material things cannot be perceived as ideas nor can an idea make an image from them. Berkeley does state that if there is such thing as material objects, they would have to be something unknowable as they cannot be inference by