ipl-logo

Summary Of Don T Blame The Eater

497 Words2 Pages

David Zinczenko’s essay, “Don’t Blame the Eater,” express the relationship between obese children and fast-food restaurants. Zinczenko observes that fast-food restaurants are located almost everywhere, are inexpensive, and are easy to access. Comparing that it is easier: to find a McDonald's, but finding an organic grapefruit will cause a scavenger hunt (463). Zinckenzo shares a personal experience of himself, eating fast-food for lunch, and dinner were his only options; resulting in him becoming obese in his early teen years. Thankfully by the time he went to college, he was able to turn his life around. Therefore, he believes that the lack of nutritional labels on fast- foods is at fault, due to the increase of childhood obesity. Even though Zinckenzo’s article was published in 2002, I support what he is calling for: fast-food restaurants should display nutritional labels on their food (464). Having access about fast-food items listed may help one make an informed decision: providing people information about ingredients listed that can cause an allergic reaction, assist in choosing alternatives, and also …show more content…

The FDA requires Nutrition labels to provide warning labels to those whom are allergic to peanuts, nuts, soy, wheat, and also milk/eggs. Customers warned to look at labels every-time, due to frequent changes to the process of making the food. These certain items are now listed by the amount used in food products. I am appreciative for this brand-new bill, due to being allergic to peanuts myself. Regarding to allergic reaction, I had a teacher whom was allergic to artificial chemicals: Yellow no.5, and Red no.3. If both the ingredients were first on food labels she was not able to eat it, for example: Ice cream, yogurt, sodas, red velvet cake, and certain crackers. Nevertheless, having the warning labels has gave us comfort to know what to choose in order to avoid an allergy

Show More
Related
271 Words | 2 Pages

Consumers barley read whats in the stuff they are taking in. Not to add, they can not know what they're taking in if it is never writing on the bottle. It is unethical to target these consumers. It could hurt the consumer causing a lawsuit or furthermore shutting down the company. FDA should regulate this kind of stuff so it never happens.

Read More
1184 Words | 5 Pages

This eventually led to the creation of the federal department of Food and Drug Administration which lays out laws for what is safe for inclusion in the food and medicine consumed by the

Read More
1061 Words | 5 Pages

So where does the blaming end and self-responsibility begin? In Zinczenko’s article “Don’t Blame the Eater” he talks about how fast food places contribute to obesity, he places some fault on children for eating it and some fault on the parents for allowing them. Zinczenko argues the fact that there are thousands of fast food places readily available to serve you and almost no healthier options in sight.

Read More
212 Words | 1 Pages

It has become common today to dismiss how fast food affects health worldwide. In David Zinczenko’s article, “Don’t Blame the Eater,” he emphasizes that fast food chains are contributing to the ongoing concern of obesity in America. In discussion of obesity, one controversial issue in “Don’t Blame the Eater” has been that fast food chains do not combine calorie information with their advertising meals. On the one hand, he asserts his unfortunate encounter with fast food throughout his childhood to further highlight his standing against fast food chain commerce. On the other hand, Zinczenko argues that diabetes in children have had a significant increase in a decade due to fast food.

Read More
94 Words | 1 Pages

Zinczenko’s Rhetorical Precis In his essay “Don’t Blame the Eater,” David Zinczenko sympathizes for port fast-food patron, like himself ages ago,  he agrees that food industry should take some responsibility for obesity. He supports his claim by warning consumers about the dangers of fast food,as it play a factor in obesity. Within his argument, he questions other counter arguments and uses his narrative tone to show consumers that the food industry is necessarily at fault. Zincenko believes  the prevalence of fast food and the lack of healthier food alternatives is causing obesity in America.

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

Zinczenko states that some fast food restaurants do provide nutritional information but they are hard to understand and the alternatives offered by fast food industries are not healthy meals a person should being eating daily (242). The argument that Zinczenko constructs about the alternatives containing “half of the government’s recommended daily calorie intake” could be valid (243). However, the essay was published in 2002 and there are many healthier alternatives provided by fast food companies today such as healthy salads, deli wraps and variety of juices. Nevertheless, I understand the author’s point about fast food restaurants and it is important that they supply the nutritional values on items because some people may not realize the contents that they are

Read More
1123 Words | 5 Pages

Zinczenko has a compelling and believable claim because his points are well-supported and based on facts from sources like National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and he does not gloss over or ignore the opposition to his opinion, like the fact that people also have a responsibility for their own health. Moreover, the topic for which he argues affects everyone, creating higher health care costs and unhealthy citizens at an ever-increasing rate. Zinczenko’s argument is agreeable because he provides statistical evidence and facts as proof for the fast-food industry’s transgressions. For example, he states, “Before 1994, diabetes in children was generally caused by a genetic disorder—only about 5 percent of childhood cases were obesity-related, or Type 2,

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

Many companies and people had failed to label foods and drugs properly claiming that they are something they are not. “Before the act, companies could alternate ingredients for a more inexpensive, low quality substitute. This made for a better profit for the producers” (“Results/Impact.”). However, with the Pure Food and Drug Act these “companies could either shut down or label the foods properly” (“Results/Impact.”). Many were against consuming products that were harmful to them which is why “[t]he House vote was 240-17” (Robertson, Derek, et al.), making the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906 “one of the most daring demonstrations of bureaucratic autonomy in the history of the United States” (“Pure Food and Drug Act (1906).”).

Read More
1463 Words | 6 Pages

These changes along with the guidelines for the amount of sodium a company can put in the food, forces the PR to take

Read More
529 Words | 3 Pages

They also warned me about something called cross-contamination which is where if something made with gluten and

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

Don’t Blame the Eater: Rebuttal In his article "Don 't Blame the Eater", David Zinczenko discusses that obesity is a grave health issue I the United States of America. He argues that almost all of the kids who eats at fast food joints are more likely to become obese. He then goes on to inform his readers that during his teenage years, he, like many other American kids, was surviving on fast-food due to it accessibility and affordability.

Read More
605 Words | 3 Pages

These are reason's restaurants should be required to post nutritional information. When people have the chance to see how much nutrition or sodium is in there food they will have a better understanding of what not to eat and what food's you can eat. In the passage, Label the Meals, it says, "Research shows that when such information is available, about one-quarter of customers use it to limit what they decide to eat. " People can quickly decide if they want food with a lot of calories in it or healthy food that do not have a lot of sugar and calories in it.

Read More
1750 Words | 7 Pages

Throughout my research for my argumentative essay, I have come to a conclusion that labels on foods are confusing for most people, they are not clear enough and they make people second guess what they are buying. This problem has caused people to have real life issues and has caused this world to make some problems even bigger. I want these sources to help me argue that this is a big issue and that there is way to fix it. My research goals are to find sources that will provide the meaning of each words on the labels, discuss what problems these labels cause such as people to ruining their healthy lifestyle, causing people to have trouble finding out if they are allergic to the food, and causing people to waste more food. I also want to find

Read More
1528 Words | 7 Pages

In a 1988 act, cigarette companies were required to put warning labels on their products. This proves that putting warning labels on fast food is certainly possible, the same needs to be done to all fast-foods so that all customers will be aware of the hazards of fast-food. Fast food warning labels will make it more convenient to know about your food; it will benefit companies; and finally, it will help reduce obesity, obesity-related illnesses, and medical costs. In Conclusion, it’s time for warning labels to be put on fast food

Read More
1108 Words | 5 Pages

Keep in mind that processed foods can contain dozens of additional chemicals that aren’t even listed on the label. For example, “artificial flavor” is a proprietary blend. Manufacturers don’t have to disclose exactly what it means and it is usually a combination of chemicals. For this reason, if you see “artificial flavor” on an ingredients list, it could mean that there are 10 or more additional chemicals that are blended in to give a specific

Read More

More about Summary Of Don T Blame The Eater

Related Topics

Open Document