Summary Of Execution Case Highlights The Power Of One Vote

1-Lexical cohesive ties in the given data 1.1Reiteration 1.1.1 Repetition In Liptak’s article “ Execution Case Highlights the Power of One Vote”, an American one, repetition is widely used, for example the word ‘execution’ is repeated six times, ‘case’ for eight times, ‘court’ seventeen times, ‘justices’ four times, etc... The writer takes his reader to live the incident and gets his attention by all these repeated word. This article is about how a single vote can save a soul in addition to the glitch and flaw of justice, so the repetition of “courtesy vote” is to show how the American’s justice is look like. There is also a repetition in dates ‘Friday’ in line seven and thirteen which is the date of the case. In Mason’s

‘glitch’, ‘flaw’ in line nine and eleven . ‘prisoner’, ‘inmate’ line four and thirty, just to avoid monotony. In Mason’s article, there is “straight forward” in line seventeen ‘direct’ line twenty five. The writer mentions, ‘referendum’ line sixteen and ‘polls’ line twenty one, for his reader to give a percentage. The words ‘threat’ line forty six ‘danger’ line forty seven these words are used to spot the light on the attacks which Ukip is facing. The words ‘targets’ in line twenty nine and ‘aims’ line eighty that is about the party’s goal. Secondly, opposition in the first article is in “life or death” in line six, ‘glitch’, ‘justice’ line nine and twelve, ‘agreed’, ‘refused’ in line fourteen, the antonym here is to open up the reader’s mind for the differences between these words and how that can effect human’s life. . The Guardian’s article, words as ‘ weakening’ ‘support’ , ‘lose’ ‘win’ , ‘early’ ‘recent’, ‘failed’ ‘success’, ‘difference’ ‘similar’, all of contrasting because of the conflict between the parties. The usage of ‘south’, ‘north’ in line eighty three, and ‘migration’ in line fifty seven ‘immigration’ line fifteen, that opposition is for focusing on migrantion’s condition all over the word. Both articles are on the same level when it comes to synonymy words to avoid repetition as possible. Antonym has the largest share

The most famous example of this lexical item is ‘party’ is superordinate to “Conservative… Ukip” in line one and ‘Tories’ in line twenty eight. Whenever the topic is about British politics parties the superordinate tie is available. This lexical item can not be found frequently in political articles. The writers do not turn to superordinate because it does not serve their purpose. 1.1.6 Co-Hyponymy In Liptak’s article, hyponymy ‘law’ line nine is a kind of ‘rule’ line fifty. The writer avoid co-hyponymy in his writing style. In The Guardian, ‘Conservative’ is a type of ‘party. Although there is a few examples, but it is strong and very clear examples. The target is to inform the reader with the type of these parties. 1.1.7 Part-Whole relation There is no usage of this lexical item in both articles, the articles are not dealing with parts it deals with types of things. 1.1.8