Peter Singer Famine, Affluence, and Morality In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” by Peter Singer he basically is stating how one should do good no matter what. That one should prevent as much suffering as they can if in the circumstances don’t cause for someone else to feel hurt. Stating, “We ought to be preventing as much suffering as we can without sacrificing something else of comparable moral importance.” (Singer 397) He also stresses that we should do everything in our power to prevent bad things from happening whether it is to other or to situations like fixing a town people once lived in. With that being said he knew that not everyone would be as helpful as others and that they would use the excuse of not being able to give as much as that other person, and if that person is not helping then why should they. He then came up with a conclusion of giving just enough to prevent more suffering. …show more content…
I also agree with the fact that many people do step down from helping in any situation if they see someone give too much money, when they can only give a little embarrassing amount. Instead of that other person helping they are really damaging others from getting help. If everyone just gave or helped a little that would be enough for everyone else to see and to feel guilt for not stepping in and it would also cross out others stating that they do not have much to give; if in case everyone gave a reasonable amount that no one could not afford. For Singer it was about keeping your morals in place and that one ought to do what is known to be the right thing to do. To help in any way possible and in doing so the world would be very different and there would be less