ipl-logo

Summary Of John Locke's Second Teatise Of Government

619 Words3 Pages

Locke – Second Teatise of Government

Chapter 2, 3
Unlike Hobbes, Locke didn’t think then man in their natural state, was selfish and competitive. Instead, he believed that all men were equally governed by reason, and that ability to reason comes from God.
• State of Nature = State of reason
• He argues that Men already enjoyed rights in the state of nature. (“life, liberty and property”)
• However, even as they enjoy these rights, there is still constant uncertainty and insecurity.
• State of War: Where force enters into the picture. There will be no end to the violence as there is no authority to judge who is right in the SoN. Thus, a state is needed to avoid this.

Chapter 6
When Locke says all men are equal, he is not talking about their …show more content…

This is because they have not fully developed rationality. Paternal power thus gets its legitimacy from the duty parents have to educate and nurture their imperfect minds.
• Once the kid understands the law of nature, they become equal to their parents, and have equal rights to life, liberty and property.
• But those who can’t/don’t (eg. lunatics) will never be able to have freedom.
• Freedom of man = grounded on rationality, the ability to govern oneself.

Chapter 7
• God gave man the desire and abilities to live in a society.
• The purpose of marriage is to sustain the human race. Procreation, and then nurturing of offspring.
• Men and women are equal. The woman has the liberty to leave a marriage. The state has no business in their marriage, other than sorting out arguments.
• Slaves are not part of civil society.
• Civil society/commonwealth has the power to decide what punishments offenders should receive. Every man has given up their right to punish when they enter the commonwealth. A civil society only exists when men all give up their right to punish.

Chapter 8 (95-99, 121-122)
When one enters a community, they also owe a duty to everyone else in the

Show More
Related
1404 Words | 6 Pages

Locke’s foundation for all his assertions on liberty is “that creatures of the same species and rank, promiscuously born to all the same advantages of nature, and the use of the same faculties, should be also equal” (Locke 8). With this comes “natural liberty” which Locke defines as “to be free from any superior power on earth,…to have only the law of nature for his rule” (Locke 17). The state of nature is something that all men are born into, but must leave to gain both stability and law because in the state of nature, as Locke write above, nature is the only force that rules man. Once one leaves the state of nature a shift is seen; now, “the liberty of man, in society, is to be under no other legislative power, but, that established, by consent” (Locke 17). Locke equates the “law of Nature” as being related to the “law of God” and it is here where Locke’s argument can be seen as divinely ordained, in the same way Louis XIV’s rule was vested in God’s power (Locke 7).

Read More
1245 Words | 5 Pages

Locke believed that it is people’s inherent right to govern themselves. He “championed the social contract and govern­ment by consent”. (Steven) He even went so far to say that people did not need to be governed. All that government is is a framework by which people protect their natural rights, but it only needs to exist in practice.

Read More
637 Words | 3 Pages

(6) The view of men and the starting point for Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau are respectfully different. Similarly, difference can also be seen in their reason for the state or a natural judge. Hobbes states that without the subjection to a common power, men are in a state of war due to their selfish human nature. However, for Locke and Rousseau, the state exists for the preservation and protection of the natural rights of its

Read More
864 Words | 4 Pages

Locke’mentions that power lays on us. Locke mentions, “MEN being, as has been said, by nature, all free, equal, and independent, no one can be put out of this estate, and subjected to the political power of another, without his own consent” (Sec 95). According to the states of nature, men are free and independent, and all have the same rights. Moreover, he declares, natural reason has its own language, and it does not need the Bible to tell us.

Read More
839 Words | 4 Pages

Locke believed that people were born with natural rights that included the right to life, liberty, and property. Locke argued that people formed governments to protect their natural rights, so the best kind of government was one with limited power and was accepted by all citizens. Locke said that a government has an obligation to the people it governs, therefore, the people have a right to revolt if the government fails at its obligations. Like many other Enlightenment philosophers, John Locke’s ideas reflected on the checks and balance system as well as the Declaration of Independence. For example, in the Declaration of Independence, it says, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Read More
374 Words | 2 Pages

Locke believes that the importance of equality itself comes from its existence in the state of nature. Equality is necessary in the establishment of the government as well

Read More
1129 Words | 5 Pages

Instead, he believes that all humans are born both free and equal, in which individuals in the society are governed by natural law. (330) The ‘sovereign power’ in John Locke’s findings relates to the government, as it subsists to help support and keep the people safe. However, if an individual is seeking the protection of their property, they must pursue an executive power to help keep that property safe. (326) This relationship between the subject and the sovereign can be considered very significant because it overshadows the way in which political societies work

Read More
584 Words | 3 Pages

From Locke’s Second Treatise of Civil Government “We must consider what state all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the natural law of nature.” John Locke also supported human equality, a perfect state of freedom, laws of nature, and

Read More
1492 Words | 6 Pages

Refugee History: Creating Understanding. Historically, one hallmark of human culture is the unfortunate distinction of how we treat the most vulnerable in our society. Furthermore, in western culture, the stories of those abused (including harmed children) are overlooked in exchange for ignorance surrounded by a privileged life. To learn more about overlooked historical events, an excellent read is the fictional novel, Refugee.

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

Through the analogy of slavery, Locke states that “for whenever he finds the hardship of slavery outweigh the value of his life, ‘tis in his power, by resisting the will of his master, to draw himself the death he desires,” (Locke 273). Although speaking of slavery, Locke directly alludes to personal servitude- a motif that represents the interplay between a tyrannical government and the citizens. Here, Locke articulates a clear justification for resistance: when governmental control becomes an unbearable force that outweighs the natural right to a free life, revolution becomes not only a right but a necessary act of liberation. Locke reinforces this principle when he states, “liberty is to be free from restraint and violence from others, which cannot be where there is no law,” (Lock 289). This exposes the role of government in maintaining arbitrary power among the people and argues that clear violation of the fundamental duty to protect and serve their citizens delegitimizes their authority and justifies the citizens right to overthrow such a

Read More
1799 Words | 8 Pages

In "Two treatises of the government", he puts a different perspective on the original, natural state of man. Unlike Hobbes, with his thesis about the "war of all against all," Locke believes that initial absolute freedom of people is not the source of struggle, but their expression of their natural equality and readiness to follow sensible and natural laws. This natural willingness of people leads them to realize that it is in the interest of the society to give the government (which is intended to ensure the further development of the society) some of their function, while maintaining freedom. This achieves a social contract between the people, because the state arises.

Read More
1893 Words | 8 Pages

Nature plays a huge role in the “Second Treatise of Government” by John Locke which was read and analyzed throughout class. Anthropocentrism is highlighted throughout Locke’s text; the belief that humans are at a higher value on earth opposed to everything else. Locke brings in the question of what kind of state is nature classified as with it comes to his political theory? ; Intrinsic or Instrumental. Locke's political theory is that each person has a right to product of his or her labor (rights of property).

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

Locke’s definition of liberty depends on whether the person is in the state of nature, in which people are “without subordination or subjection” (Locke 101) or if they have formed into a commonwealth, or whenever “any number of men are so united into one society, as to quit every one his executive power of the law of nature, and resign it to the public” (Locke 137-38). In the Lockean state of nature, men have a “freedom to order their actions and dispose of their possessions and persons” (Locke 101). This freedom is still limited by what Locke refers to as the law of nature, or that “no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions” (Locke 102). He also defines the liberty of the state of nature as “not to be under any will or legislative authority of man” (Locke 109). In his form of commonwealth, there is more limited freedom, in which liberty is to “be under no legislative power, but that established, by the consent of the commonwealth” (Locke 110).

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

25). Locke’s state of nature demonstrates a state which entails perfect freedom and the right to one’s own actions and possessions (Locke 2 sect. 4). He then

Read More
1751 Words | 8 Pages

The State of Nature, although a state wherein there is no civil authority or government to punish people for transgressions against laws, is not a state without morality. To Locke, persons are assumed to be equal to one another in such a state, and therefore equally capable of discovering and being bound by the Law of Nature. The Law of Nature, which is on Locke’s view the basis of all morality, and given to us by God, commands that we not harm others with regards to their life, health, liberty, or possessions. This is because we all belong equally to God, and because we cannot take away that which is rightfully His, we are prohibited from harming one another. So, the State of Nature is a state of liberty where persons are free to pursue their own interests and plans, free from interference, and, because of the Law of Nature and the restrictions that it imposes upon persons, it is relatively peaceful.

Read More

More about Summary Of John Locke's Second Teatise Of Government

Related Topics

Open Document