Summary Of Justice Thomas Originalism

1629 Words7 Pages

Originalism is a judicial theory that reads the Constitution based on its original meaning at the time of its enactment. Justice Clarence Thomas is an outspoken advocate of originalism, which has left a legacy in the history of American literature. Many have questioned and scrutinized his opinions on originalism, stare decisis, and precedent, especially considering modern culture. In addition to its legal significance, Justice Thomas's jurisprudential approach has significant socio-political effects, making him the longest-serving African American justice in Supreme Court history. In some ways, Justice Clarence Thomas's viewpoints seem to be somewhat out of step with modern culture, but they also connect with some sections of society. Originalism …show more content…

Yes, it is true that the legal system is evolving, and legal interpretations must change to consider the ways in which society is evolving. However, I feel Justice Thomas stresses the need to be true to the original meaning of the Constitution, seeing it as the foundation upon which all other judicial rulings should be based. According to him, the Constitution offers a timeless structure that can adapt to changing social norms without compromising its core values. Justice Thomas expresses significant concern about some cultural attitudes and socioeconomic trends in his views on modern society. He expresses uncertainty about popular myths and stereotypes while promoting originality and rational thought. His focus on individual agency and critique of societal narratives point to a shift from popular cultural discourse, which often places an emphasis on group dynamics and collective identities. Additionally, his appreciation for foundational texts such as the Constitution and the writings of historical figures like Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington indicates a reverence for traditional values and principles that could be at