ipl-logo

Summary Of Maintaining American Democracy Not Through Reform

2144 Words9 Pages

March 21, 2016 Jessica Sanford !1
Maintaining American Democracy Not Through Reform (PG Independent Study)
Introduction
In Reforming the Republic - Democratic Institutions for the New America Todd Donovan and Shaun Bowler discuss the necessity to reform the American electoral process and ways in which it could be done. Although the article discusses in depth how and why civil participation and trust in the government are severely lacking, it does not pose a convincing argument for codifying a new electoral process through changes to the Constitution, nor does it present specific paths to take for change. Their overarching argument is this: the American electoral system must be reformed through amending the Constitution in order to increase …show more content…

One way in which civil participation plays out in American democracy is through local self-government. Tocqueville finds America’s township system to be unique in its way to engage citizens by bringing town institutions, what he equates to the vice of freedom, within people’s reach with the right to use it how they please (Tocqueville, 73). What is more is that people obey the law not because their status is inferior to those running the local government, but because they recognize the benefits that laws give to the community, and they abide by them out of respect (77). Following rules not because of inferiority but because of equality of the large middle-class allows for the people to pursue their own interests in an environment governed by their own people and class, knowing they could have an equal say in governmental affairs (79). Self-empowerment in …show more content…

Freedom of association is a right, and the Constitution makes it clear that the government cannot impede a person’s ability to associate however they wish, politically and otherwise. Freedom of political association is rare, Tocqueville says, but surprisingly, freedom works for American democracy: “the political freedom to associate is not as dangerous to the public space as is supposed and that it could strengthen a state which for some time it had shaken” (Tocqueville, 607); and: “Thus it is by enjoying a dangerous freedom that Americans learn the skill of reducing the risks of freedom” (608). Tocqueville normally has feared freedom, especially freedom of political association, because he has previously seen it as a gateway for tyranny of the majority; however, in America, Tocqueville appreciates this strange phenomenon as being constructive rather than detrimental. In fact, its goodness, Tocqueville describes, can be explained upon checking the vitality of the nation: in America, one would

Show More
Related
764 Words | 4 Pages

The American Democracy Now textbook explains about the different 9 chapters, such as The Constitution, Federalism, Civil Liberties, Public Opinion, Interest Groups, Political, and etc. Within each of the 9 chapters it describes a brief history of America and how it help mold and shaped the way we live, and the way we think from a different perspective of a person opinion. Throughout the years, technology has influenced different ways people and government communicates and organizes their political campaigns such as television, computers, cell phones, and news services. Technology has challenged people to give them opportunities to respond to make a deep impact in the future of the nation.

Read More
714 Words | 3 Pages

Social capital has been one of the most active areas of research and debate in the social sciences over the last decade. Among many social scientists, Robert D. Putnam is one of the strong advocates of social capital paradigm. In his widely cited 1995 essay “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital”, Putnam defines social capital as “features of social organization such as networks, norms, and social trust that facilitates coordination and cooperation for mutual benefits” (Putnam, 1995). He argues that community life is easier when there is substantial amount of social capital for many reasons such as better schools, faster economic development, lower crime and more effective government (Putnam, 1995). In addition to Putnam, Tocqueville also discusses the notion of voluntary association and its connection to democracy in “Democracy in America” (1835-1840).

Read More
286 Words | 2 Pages

In the year 1831, a Frenchman travelled to the newly established United States of America to research ideas that make America what it is. This man, Alexis de Tocqueville, made his journey in America over 9 months covering 7,000 miles of land. In Tocqueville’s book published in 1835, Democracy in America, the observations he made would help to define what people think America represents. From his finds, the political and cultural atmosphere surrounding America’s great sense of democracy is the primary source of identity for what makes America special.

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

The book covers various topics such as the principles of equality and individualism, the decentralization of political power, the role of civil society, religion, and the rule of law, and the potential benefits and dangers of democracy. Tocqueville examines the unique features of American democracy and how they have influenced American society. The book offers an analysis of American democracy that remains relevant to discussions of democracy and its challenges. "Democracy in America" is a work of political philosophy that provides insights into the strengths and weaknesses of democracy and its potential to promote freedom, justice, and equality. Tocqueville’s vocabulary and context used are much different than any American of the 20th century would use but the validity of his statements is still looked upon today.

Read More
1201 Words | 5 Pages

He then criticizes the deep-seated belief that one person cannot make a difference in their community, prompting the audience to consider all of the times they’ve been told that real change cannot occur because most people are too selfish, too stupid, or too lazy (Meslin 2014, 00:11). Meslin goes on to argue that apathy is not the root cause of disengagement, but rather a symptom of a political system that was designed to discourage citizen participation. Furthermore, he insists that people are not apathetic by nature, but are instead turned off by the current political process that is confusing and exclusionary. He then describes some of the structural barriers that prevent people from participating in the political process. The first barrier he identifies is intentional exclusion; using an interesting analogy to contrast a newspaper ad for a zoning application change for a new building in Toronto, with an ad for Nike shoes.

Read More
1352 Words | 6 Pages

“I have tried to see not differently but further…”(Tocqueville, 1835) was Alexis de Tocqueville’s conclusion to the introduction of his perennial classic text Democracy in America, and adumbrates to the reader of his modern ideas and observations that were to follow. At the same time, he measures the progress of society through its relationship with equality and liberty. In this paper, I will highlight Tocqueville’s use of equality and liberty to compare the past and the modern, and establish his views on the effects of these concepts with society and each other. Finally, I will put forth that Tocqueville does not favour one concept over the other, but notes the complex relationship between the two and the importance of the co-existence of liberty and equality for a society of people. To begin, let us build the base case to compare with and look the past as defined by Tocqueville, with emphasis on equality and liberty.

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

Alexis de Tocqueville’s evaluation of America and its political structure, system, and institution in Democracy in America is a classical liberal philosopher’s take on a new democratic structure unrivaled by any other government. The uniqueness of America stems from its foundation, and is driven by the mores of the American people. That being said, there are some flaws looming so large and dangerous to American democracy that Tocqueville takes great care to ensure his readers are aware. One great concern he has for the sanctity of democracy is the concept of “place hunting.” The mindset behind place-hunting, to Tocqueville, needs to be avoided at all costs; however, the act of place-hunting itself is not inherently evil and is one of the

Read More
845 Words | 4 Pages

De Tocqueville had a discussion on how Americans combat the effects of individualism by free institutions. Individualism is what is need to be understood first. It is common for it to be known as something we can do ourselves; our freedom. This is especially true when talking politically of individuals over a state or government control. Tocqueville says that free constitutions were how American’s brought the idea of individualism.

Read More
1535 Words | 7 Pages

Speaking about majority rule and its dangers in Democracy in America, Tocqueville stated, “I am therefore of opinion, that social power superior to all others must always be placed somewhere; but I think that liberty is endangered when this power finds no obstacle which can retard its course, and give it time to moderate its own vehemence”. Tocqueville acknowledged that majority rule gave power to a greater portion of the people, but that it undeniably suppressed the voices of minorities and underrepresented certain parties and factions. According to Tocqueville, majority rule had the potential and the tendency to plant weeds of tyranny that, unless identified and removed, would overtake the beautiful garden bed of democracy. Tocqueville describes the difficulty of remedying the advancement of “tyranny of the majority” because the principles that cause this negative and disastrous political phenomenon are the same principles that democracies are founded on and revolve around throughout their existence. The very principles and values that swell the bosom of mankind with aspirations of liberty, freedom, and equality can be the ultimate cause of their societal individuality.

Read More
1408 Words | 6 Pages

Scholars from all over the Western world have analyzed and discussed the impact of democracy has had for the citizens of the United States, for over 200 years. Each new period throughout American history, has brought a new concept of being an individual in a democratic society. One flaw scholars from the late nineteenth century saw with democracy was that the majority ruled and if an individual part of the minority their voices were not heard, even if the minority was just and the majority unjust. Thus the democracy most Americans are proud to have is primarily individualistic and can be deemed corrupt because of the focus of majority rule, which might not be the wisest decision. Alexis de Tocqueville was a French writer who wrote several essays on his visit to the United States.

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

“…individualism, at first, only saps the virtues of public life; but in the long run it attacks and destroys all others…” (Tocqueville Pg. 22) According to this state meant by Tocqueville believes that individualism causes separation from one another which in the long run can cause disruption to the democratic view. He also saw participation in public affairs as growth in association; that religion and the right understanding of self-interest is the only way to fight against the America’s democracy and the effect that individualism has on democracy. Individualism produces equality that makes despotism dangerous to equality. When bringing people together with a common belief; Tocqueville believes religion is one of the only ways to combat individualism.

Read More
1448 Words | 6 Pages

In 1831 French sociologist and political theorist Alexis De Tocqueville and a lawyer he befriended named Gustave de Beaumont, spent nine months traveling around America studying its prisons and came back with a full report on the cultural, political and psychological life in America. While Beaumont wrote about the penitentiary system, Tocqueville focused more in the cultural and political life in America. He wrote two essays and published them in a book called Democracy in America. He discussed the possible threats to democracy and the possible dangers of democracy. He believed that religion and equality were the greatest ideas and they were the most advanced in the United States and that's why democracy worked so well in America.

Read More
940 Words | 4 Pages

The United States currently faces a severe problem with one of their governmental processes. In the democratic system of the United States, politicians are elected by voting from the citizens, in most cases. The problem the United States is facing is that people are no longer voting in elections for officials. This problem is discussed in the article, “In praise of low voter turnout”, written by Charles Krauthammer. The main idea behind this article is that voters are no longer interested in politics, as they were in previous generations.

Read More
876 Words | 4 Pages

In the introductory chapter of his book, he wrote “Amongst the novel objects that attracted my attention during my stay in the United States, nothing struck me more forcibly than the general equality of conditions” (de Tocqueville 12). Tocqueville was particularly amaze at the American brand of equality because it did merely exist as a dogma or as a principle, but it was an element of life for the people. Thus, equality existed, according to Tocqueville, on the personal and social level. Today, the reality may be that not all American people are equal, but the equality principle had and has continued to underpin many democratic institutions. The Declaration of Independence, which sets out the foundation of American rights and freedoms, provided that ‘all men are created equal.’

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

In the United States, people always talk about freedom and equality. Especially they want elections could be more democratic. In American Democracy in Peril, Hudson’s main argument regarding chapter five “Election Without the People’s Voice,” is if elections want to be democratic, they must meet three essential criteria, which are to provide equal representation of all citizens, to be mechanisms for deliberation about public policy issues, and to control what government does. Unfortunately, those points that Hudson mentions are what American elections do not have. American elections do not provide equal representation to everyone in the country.

Read More

More about Summary Of Maintaining American Democracy Not Through Reform

Related Topics

Open Document