In my English class, I read Johann Neem's essay “Online Higher Education’s Individualist Fallacy.” Neem is a professor at Western Washington University who argues for the effectiveness of the campus and classroom. The essay disagrees with eradicating campuses and going entirely online because of the lack of depth within the courses. Though online classes have gained popularity, campus attendance is best as it offers human interaction with a teacher and classmates, as well as the development of social and team bonding skills. A computer is rugged enough to work within a teacher-student relationship. An online classroom course would eliminate the bond between teachers and students in the complex learning process. In Neem’s essay, he tells his …show more content…
However, the peer portion takes the cake. The most significant part of the school experience is the companionship of peers and the social interactions one would have. The critical goal of schools is to prepare students for the future workforce. However, online programs take away from the social portion of this work preparation. An article by Unity Environmental University read, “Lack of participation is a chronic issue with online classes. Students may feel awkward or struggle to connect with their professors or classmates virtually. Technology issues exacerbate these challenges because they can make communication seem unnatural,” and explains, “In-person classes provide regular face-to-face interactions where people can engage in natural, spontaneous discussions and develop genuine connections. This can aid in building your professional network because many of your classmates will likely be working in the same industry as you after graduation”(Couldn't find a name). The key to crafting future adults is not only packing them with info, but putting them in situations with no formula or correct answers. Social skills are developed inside in-person campuses, schools, and extracurricular activities, not behind a