ipl-logo

Summary Of The Fears Of The Federal List

783 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay comparing the federalist party and democratic republican party

In the article The fears of the federal list by Linda Kerber and The fears of the Jeffersonian Republic by Drew McCoy both draw the ideals of the federal list in the Republicans distant conflict of opposing ideas in the political field. Kerber expresses how federal us were carefully placed people with leadership from top minds of wealth, well McCoy shined the Republicans in a light of united people that were more willing to change with more of a insurgent mentality. Yet these groups seem to have ideas on different spectrums of the political layout of what America would become they both feared that the effects of each other's party would have on the public and influence for change. The key concerns The federal is held since the start of the …show more content…

The ideals of an elite class that could restrict their character role in the government to strengthen their control after the rebellion. Yet, the Nervous attitude of these federalist were that a lack of regard for this government could spread throughout the society altering and bringing disregard to most of the colonies. The control of this elite class of sedulous found it unpredictable to contain this culture yet they also didn't trust the Republicans to be aware of the social order that was being presented in America at this time in history. This unevenness in the American colonies brought a bias of support to Honorable behaviors against what the Republicans were looking to …show more content…

Yet the federal us movement saw this is supporting flexibility not stability within the nation. McCoy describes these ideas of the Republicans with their own bias view giving a more enlightened look at Republicans compared to Kerber Article that gives a persistent view of their opportunity as federalist and their success with political however after reading McCoys article sheds light on how Jefferson did not want to industrialize the country a feeling that there was little need and that the ideal diss taste meant for proletariat on industry labor and also discussions and arguments over Louisiana purchase. Federal us at this time so this purchase to be random and unneeded where Jefferson sought is the importance of expansion of the country and contributing to a realistic power being added to the

Show More
Related
1675 Words | 7 Pages

Within the first chapter, Larson describes how Americans after the American Revolution were hesitant about changing ideas. The idea of federal powers and a new market economy scared the lives of many as they feared the corruption of these higher powers were imminent. The Americans held onto their free market economy with disbelief as they did not understand their own economy could be corrupted as well. In short, the Americans had to pick the lesser of two evils that would give them more liberty with the best chance it would not corrupt their market. The side that embraced the free market was the Democratic-Republicans were the others that opposed it was the Federalists.

Read More
80 Words | 1 Pages

i agree withe your analogy on what would america have done if Jefferson did not make the Louisiana purchase because as a country we still would have grown and eventually expanded western and to the south as well. Furthermore as far as your take on the republican simplicity not having to be congruent with the Louisiana purchase i disagree i believe that Jefferson saw that it fit the Republican simplicity perfectly and took his shot at making america fit

Read More
1597 Words | 7 Pages

While they are aware that they have ⅓ or so seats in Congress compared to the majority of Democratic-Republicans, the Federalists only sought to cling onto the existence of the Federalist party and not have it die out completely. The Federalists’ principals evolved to become more traditional Democratic-Republicans to preserve their original interest: trade. Likewise, the Democratic-Republicans sought out war and a stronger military in order to benefit the future of the West and its upcoming agrarian states. Although the methods change, their basic self-interests do not. Furthermore, the Democratic-Republicans revealed a flaw in their strict interpretation policy.

Read More
1511 Words | 7 Pages

(1).” This group did not the Constitution did not properly state the rights and powers of the three branches of government, states’ rights, etc. In order to please the Anti-federalists, the Preamble was put into place to allow American citizens know the central government’s rights, and states’ rights. Lecture 15 “Questions to Consider #1”: In what ways does the modern American economy resemble the plan set out in Hamilton’s three great reports?

Read More
1418 Words | 6 Pages

The Federalist did not believe ordinary men could be trusted to elect men of character: Cosmopolitan men. The process intended, was with fewer men to be elected the people would vote for the most prominent man, most often of aristocratic birth; however, the distinction of a Cosmopolitan man was becoming more blurred as the social lines were less defined after the Revolution. The decision to take power from the local government and give it to the more liberal central government started with the Federalist movement and has been evoked throughout American’s

Read More
122 Words | 1 Pages

Henry Clay led the nationalistic Jeffersonian economic agenda. This agenda was known as the American System (Holt, 1999). It included high protective tariffs to nourish American manufacturing, create a home market for American agricultural products, a national bank to provide a currency and federal subsidization of internal improvement projects to ease the movement of goods (Holt, 1999). These nationalistic Jeffersons would eventually push through Congress and the current President at the time (President Madison) would sign laws that affected two parts of their program. The Federalist Party diminished after 1815 and many former Federalists embraced the Republican Party.

Read More
208 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalist Party did not last and today 's Republican

Read More
595 Words | 3 Pages

They opposed the Federalists so intensely because they thought Federalists were trying to reinstate the tyranny of the British. The Federalist ideal of empowering the government, which mostly consists of the elite, supposedly sought to oppress the common people and steal their prosperity. Republicans believed they had to remain vigilant at all times, lest the tyrannical Federal government encroach upon their liberties and destroy the purpose of the

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

After a fiercely fought revolution, the newly independent American nation struggled to establish a concrete government amidst an influx of opposing ideologies. Loosely tied together by the Articles of Confederation, the thirteen sovereign states were far from united. As growing schisms in American society became apparent, an array of esteemed, prominent American men united in 1787 to form the basis of the United States government: the Constitution. Among the most eminent members of this convention were Alexander Hamilton, Aaron Burr, James Madison, and Thomas Jefferson. These men, held to an almost godly stature, defined the future of the nation; but were their intentions as honest as they seemed?

Read More
331 Words | 2 Pages

Today’s America has evolved differently from the intention of a certain group of the founder’s. This essay takes the stance that America in 2017 is moving closer to the viewpoint of the Federalists, compared to the Republicans. First, one must analyze the two parties, then draw the conclusion with supportive facts. Lastly, the comparisons will be summarized and the differences will be minimized.

Read More
305 Words | 2 Pages

They wanted to create a relationship with France, focused on agriculture over commercialism, and free trade. Over time the Federalist party weakened while the Jeffersonian republicans evolved into the Democrats.

Read More
972 Words | 4 Pages

Another way the biases were shown was in the political cartoon (Doc.4) which shows Jefferson attempting to the destroy the constitution. The cartoon is expressing the fear that the federal government will gain too much power and overthrow the constitution, and as a result, giving the federal government much more power. The federal government possessed too much power and the American people were starting to notice, represented by the American eagle fighting Jefferson, attempting to stop him. The American people recognized that federal government possessed too much power, too much voice, and did not remember the basic freedoms which all men have, choosing instead to ignore them, allowing their personal biases to take

Read More
1337 Words | 6 Pages

The federalists saw this the opposite way and wanted the large republic and felt that a large republic was the true way to protect liberty. The important

Read More
241 Words | 1 Pages

Both Federalists and Democratic-Republicans, have different opinions on how they want the Government to function. For example on page 292, Alexander Hamilton was representing the Federalists. Here are a few examples of what the Federalists had wanted, they wanted to rule by the Wealthy class, have a strong Federal Government, and want to have an Alliance with the British. There was also an issue with immigration because the immigrants had supported the ideals of the French Revolution, so the Federalists were not too excited about that. On the contrary, Thomas Jefferson was representing the Democratic- Republicans.

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

Jefferson wanted a nation in which the state and the federal government shared

Read More

More about Summary Of The Fears Of The Federal List

Related Topics

Open Document