Summary Of The Hellenistic Age By Thomas Martin

641 Words3 Pages

In the book "The Hellenistic Age," Thomas Martin argues that the Hellenistic period was a crucial time for the development of Greek culture. This period spans between the deaths of Alexander the Great in 323 B.C. and Cleopatra V11 in 30 B.C. and focuses on how the generals from Alexander’s forces controlled and expanded the late king’s empire.
The Hellenistic Age was a time when Greek culture spread to the Mediterranean following Alexander the Great’s death (Martin, p. 253). The generals of the late Alexander created Hellenistic kingdoms. These generals became kings and ruled the land in the regions that they had conquered. Historians refer to the Hellenistic period as the “Golden Age” of ancient science (Martin, p. 273) because there were many discoveries during this time in fields …show more content…

In academic writing, the author’s objective is to provide an unbiased narrative. While other forms of writing, such as novels, allow the author to change events, historical and academic writing is intended to educate the readers. The job of an academic writer is to be unbiased and factual. The author, Thomas Martin, writes an objective approach to historical events during the Hellenistic period because he does not mention his background, which would reveal his biases. However, even historians that aim to be objective have biases, even if they are not explicitly obvious to the audience, based on the author's political, social, and cultural beliefs. Even if the biases are not explicitly obvious in "The Hellenistic Age," the writer might still have an agenda, which can be a form of bias. Martin focuses on Greek culture and credits accomplishments from that time to them. And even though the Greeks are responsible for many ideas and inventions, such as in philosophy and science, Greek, Persian, and Egyptian cultures were intermingled in the Ptolemies