The general arguments made by Paul Waldman in his work, “The Case For Banning Guns,” and by Shikha Dalmia in her work, “The Case Against Banning Guns,” is that there have been numerous issues arising in America due to a national debate about gun control. Both authors state their personal opinions about whether or not guns should be permanently banned, regulated, or even if the problem is not the gun, but the person who pulls the trigger. They each provide various examples and briefly mention a few past mass shootings to support their beliefs on this tragic topic. Beginning with Waldman’s argument, he believes that almost all guns should be banned. Although he knows that this task is impossible, he thinks that America would be a far better society without them.
In the Washington Post article, Martha Yates report that after the Vegas shooting, when will it be the right time to consider gun control? Guns are the most efficient way to kill and it also result in the most casualties. German Lopez, author of the article The research is clear: gun control saves lives, agrees that, “Gun control likely saves lives, even if it won’t and can’t prevent all gun deaths”. He said that the more we can control, the less death will occur (Lopez). Lopez research explains that, “The US also has by far the highest number of guns in the world” (1).
In today’s society, any involvement of the word “guns” alludes to images of horrible massacres such as Sandy Hook, Planned Parenthood, and San Bernardino. In all of these terrible incidents, it was not the gun that caused the happening, but rather the actions of these cowardly humans that were in control of the firearm. Although it is easy to blame these tragedies on the weapons that facilitated them, it is ignorant to believe that gun control will end this unneeded bloodshed. With the number of concealed-carry gun permits being at an all time high (12.8 million) (New Study para. 1) and the rate of violent crime being lower than it has been in roughly four decades, then why has the happening of seemingly random mass shootings dramatically increased?
Twelve people were killed and fifty-eight others were harmed. Limitations and restrictions need to be placed on all weapons of every size for these reasons – Innocent people are dying at the hands of a mentally unstable person. These are a couple of numerous examples of mass shootings that have happened in the past which have sparked countrywide debate about the controversial topic of gun control. If something isn’t done about keeping firearms under control then these awful crimes may be committed in the future. Every 3 years, approximately 300 thousand Americans fall victim to gun violence.
Many people have been influenced by means of the incidents, tragedies and their own perspectives. While over four million Americans argue that the right to bear arms is not only a constitution right but also a natural right to defend oneself. While on the opposite side of the spectrum gun control advocates state that a gun’s only purpose is to kill or wound. Along with this perspective gun control advocates show evidence that banning of certain firearms decreases the overall gun crime rate; in spite of that fact, the opposite appears to be true for the purpose of the universal ban of firearms in European countries that seem to only drive violent crimes up. Now the central tendency of the majority of Americans seems to be one that has limited gun-control but is coupled with proper training and licensing.
In 2018 alone, were 30 mass shootings, innocent people are losing their lives and it is not a good imagine to put out for the youth that is watching. Gun control should be enforced because society isn’t safe with all of the gun violence that is going on in the world. An issue that has grown as of late in our general public is the civil argument over firearm control. Numerous inquiries emerge concerning who ought to have the capacity to possess firearms, and how those
According to the Director, Daniel Webster, “all mass shootings only [account] for a small percentage of gun violence that [occurs] every day. Since the Aurora shooting, an estimated 3035 Americans [have] died as a result of gun violence. Guns were used to kill more than 31 000 people in 2010. The US homicide rate was seven times higher than the average of all other high-income countries because the US firearm homicide rate was 22 times higher” (Webster, 1554). Webster proposes that not only are gun restrictions needed because of high death toll caused by guns, but that gun owners want reform themselves.
The use of and the owning of guns is a very hot and debated topic in society today. For many, this is a life and death debate due to the recent and numerous school shootings. These school shootings have caused an outcry for more gun control, specifically in relation to the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Despite these calls, increased gun control is not the answer. Most gun owners’ use their guns responsibly and for good purposes.
The debate over gun control has caused a great amount of attention from the media in the past five years. When Adam Lanza killed 20 first-graders and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., before taking his own life in one of the nation 's most horrific mass shootings. There have been marches and protests, Super Bowl advertisements, emotional and contentious congressional and state hearings and a new, tough gun-control law. This year alone there has been over 11,000 deaths related to gun violence. Along with those deaths there has been a combined 20,000 injuries.
Over the past years, United States of America has experienced tragic mass shootings. For instance, on June 12th, 2016, 49 people were reported to have been killed and more than 58 wounded in Orlando after being shot by a 29-year-old man who it was alleged to have had a motive of terror hate crime. In addition, on October 1st, 2017, 58 people were killed and more than 515 wounded in Las Vegas after they were shot by a 64-year-old man. Due to this, the need for a much stricter gun control laws has emerged due to the fact that the process of acquiring firearms in the U.S has been found to be too easy. On that note, this argumentative essay seeks to address the question as to why there should be stricter gun control laws in the U.S. Why There Should be Strict Gun Control in the United States
When high-capacity magazines were used in mass shootings, the death rate rose 63% and the injury rate rose 156%.”. This piece of evidence is significant because it goes to show what the problem is with having high capacity guns open to the public, there becomes a higher death rate when dealing with high capacity firearms. The last reason why the U.S. should have more gun laws is to keep women safer from guns. Many women across the United States do feel protected or safe because of their sex, and guns are surely not helping out with their safety.
Furthermore he says most of the gun deaths are classified as manslaughter with implies a crime committed without forethought. In addition to this, the background check wouldn’t be as effective as they hope it would be, because it will to hard to make rules for a few people in the
Literary Essay: Gun Control Guns. Over 300 million of them are legally owned. They take 33,000 lives every year in America (Leah Libresco, “Gun Control is not the answer”). But why don’t we ban them?
Today’s politicians have it all wrong when it comes to the gun control battle, and the fight to ban gun access across America. America as a country owns more firearms than any other country in the world. Currently people in the United States feel that their second amendment rights do not hold the weight that they used to . Washington believes the violence comes from the guns; however, it takes a human being to pull the trigger. That is the same as saying the car killed the man and not the drunk driver inside.
Despite this high rate of gun crime, mass shootings in America show no sign of disappearing, as gun culture is deeply rooted in the American spirit. Many Americans view the gun as a symbol of freedom representing the heart of the nation’s foundation. When they think of guns, they picture the colonial
