ipl-logo

Summary Of The Rights Of The British Colonies By James Otis

869 Words4 Pages

After the conclusion of the French and Indian War, England attempted to increase control over its American colonies until the colonists began an armed rebellion at Lexington and Concord in 1775. John Adams, however, accurately points out that while Lexington and Concord serve as a beginning of military conflict between the colonists and their British rulers, the actual revolution took place during the previous decade. This view of the 1766 to 1775 colonial reaction to Great Britain’s reorganization of the empire is illustrated by James Otis’ essay, The Rights of the British Colonies, the Stamp Act Congress’ proposed resolutions and Benjamin Franklin’s testimony before the Parliament, and Patrick Henry’s speech to the House of Burgesses. These …show more content…

Otis contrasts two types of power structure: Oligarchies and aristocracies, where only a select few posses a large amount of power, and democracies, where power is distributed amongst the people. Most successful countries and empires throughout history structure their government to one of the two extremes, leading to corruption, in the case of an oligarchy or aristocracy, or poor decision making, in the case of a complete democracy. From his analysis of these systems of government, Otis proposes “to have those several power properly combined,” calling for the integration of both political systems in American society instead of only following one to an extreme. (Otis 105) The idea of a balance between authoritarianism and republicanism is virtually unprecedented in history; the only civilization resembling Otis’ idea was ancient Rome, but it failed to accurately reflect his vision as there was an inability to maintain balance between the Senate and the Roman people. Furthermore, Otis also …show more content…

Colonists despised the Stamp Act of 1765 for this reason, as it hindered the liberties they could exercise because of the unjustified financial burden it posed. The colonists peaceful call for reform of English legislation through the means of the Stamp Act Congress and Ben Franklin’s testimony indicated the initial stages of a revolution. Although, at this point, the colonists did not desire the consequence of war with England, the hatred for their mother country was building, and it eventually forced the Parliament to repeal the Stamp Act. Franklin had warned the House of Commons of the colonists displeasure with the Stamp Act by saying “A total loss of the respect and affection the people of America bear to [England],” and furthermore, a loss “of all the commerce that depends on that respect and affection” would occur if England remained stagnant. Colonists largely believed the taxes imposed on them were not only overpriced, but also violated the basic “natural rights’. The degree of colonial displeasure was illustrated when Franklin stated that even if military force were applied to enforcing the Stamp Act, “they cannot force a man to take stamps who chooses to do without them.” Many took Otis’ expression “Taxation without representation

Show More
Related
559 Words | 3 Pages

Christopher Hibbert’s book “Redcoats and Rebels” is a narrative of the American Revolution told from the British point of view. The book incorporates many facts and material that most readers are not too familiar with as many books on the American Revolution are told from the American side. Discussing the war from this point of view illustrates the growing tensions This perspective provides information necessary to understand the struggles and how the British actually lost the war. The American Revolution was discussed to its entirety throughout the book giving details as to how the British lost the war.

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

Under the control of the British Parliament in 1775, the American colonies consider going to war in order to gain independence from Britain. In “Patrick Henry’s Speech in the Virginia Convention,” Henry addresses the need for American colonists to work together to stop the British from controlling them. Thus, Henry’s periodic sentence, rhetorical questions, antithesis, and anaphora successfully convince the American colonists to unite against the British and to bring awareness to their wrongdoings. Firstly, Henry applies periodic sentences and rhetorical questions to convey the idea that the American Colonists must fight back against the British by working together if they want to gain freedom. Henry believes that “if [they] wish to

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

March 23, 1775. A crowd of Virginia delegates were corralled into a tiny church to attend the second Virginia Convention where history was soon to be changed forever. On the third day of the convention Patrick Henry, a flamboyant rebel, arose from the mass to deliver a speech that would silence his opposition and encourage his supporters. “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death” was articulated for the purpose of persuading the members of the convention to organize militia units in every county of Virginia and to stand up to Great Britain to gain their independence. Henry’s speech included protests against the ongoing and relentless British tyranny that invaded the colonists’ lives.

Read More
1491 Words | 6 Pages

At the dawn of the 1770s, American colonial resentment of the British Parliament in London had been steadily increasing for some time. Retaliating in 1766, Parliament issued the Declaratory Act which repealed most taxes except issued a reinforcement of Parliament’s supremacy. In a fascinating exchange, we see that the Parliament identifies and responds to the colonists main claim; Parliament had no right to directly tax colonists who had no representation in Parliament itself. By asserting Parliamentary supremacy while simultaneously repealing the Stamp Act and scaling back the Sugar Act, Parliament essentially established the hill it would die on, that being its legitimacy. With the stage set for colonial conflict in the 1770s, all but one

Read More
1064 Words | 5 Pages

Patrick Henry presented a monumental speech that convinced the Virginia delegates to consider independence from England. Henry’s speech was one of the many catalysts that tilted the once ambivalent and divided mindsets of the colonists about England to a rebellious sentiment. The powerful speech was delivered on March 23, 1775 which called for opposition against the British; the rapid success of the Henry’s speech can be seen by the first military engagements in the Battles of Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775 shortly after the speech was made at the Virginia Convention. In his speech, Henry attempts to persuade the members of the Convention that war with Britain is inevitable and waiting will only make the war more difficult to win.

Read More
512 Words | 3 Pages

After reading the document "The Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved" wrote by James Otis, I agree with the contemporaries of Otis that the document was written to challenge the authority of the king and parliament. In the document, Otis argued in favor of the natural rights. He believed that each individual should carry his or her own judgments; these judgments should be valued regardless of the physical power, wealth or property the individual possesses. He questioned the king and parliament by raising the discussion about the relationship between authority and property; since authority confers property, as he believed, the government should give independence to its people to earn respect and to avoid future conflict. Otis believed that British colonies should have the rights to rule their own land and to protect its people from forced slavery.

Read More
685 Words | 3 Pages

The Quartering Act disrespected the privacy of Americans (Document 5). Moreover, this act allowed British soldiers to barge in on the colonists’ home life, forcing them to provide food, utensils, bedding, firewood, and other objects for the soldiers. In addition to this, the Quartering Act showed that the British were disinterested in how Americans lived their lives in their homes and purposefully sabotaged the colonists’ leadership in their homes, showing that the British controlled the colonists’ homes. The Stamp Act also demonstrated that the British were apathetic towards the colonists’ opinions (Document 6). The Stamp Act taxed newspapers and pamphlets, which outraged the colonists.

Read More
650 Words | 3 Pages

Benjamin Franklin, a very wise publisher from Philadelphia, has recently been testifying against the stamp act and promoting the idea of American liberties. For those who are not aware, the Stamp Act consisted of the British taxing goods made in the colonies and the colonists must pay tax on every piece of printed papers that they used , toward the English. Currently people are rebelling toward this taxation and we believe that we should only be taxed by our own representatives just as the English people are. We Americans are paying very heavy taxes toward the British government and the heavy taxation on us must come to an end. Today in the colonies, we currently pay taxes on all estates, a tax on all offices, trades and businesses, and 10 pounds for every slave that gets imported to the colonies.

Read More
159 Words | 1 Pages

In 1765, the disapproval of the Stamp Act caused the colonies to unite and stand up for what they believed in. John Adams describes his amaze in how all the colonists are filled with the spirit of liberty. Today, the spirit of liberty still remains because without it we wouldn’t fight for our rights and be where we are today. Liberty is having the right and freedom to do what we want, be who we want, and have what we want as long as it doesn’t harm the liberties of others. Although sometimes we take our freedom for granted we do realize how lucky we are to have the ability to be ourselves.

Read More
412 Words | 2 Pages

Additionally, the last important causes is these laws not only attempted to force colonies admit Crown’s monarchy authority impose to the colonists’ duties, but also in the affect of Thomas Paine’s Common Sense awaken colonies’ ideology of protecting their equal rights and freedom. Since the Stamp acts, current acts, colonists alerted ever more taxes could follow and feared British will impose stronger acts to against their resistance, eventually would threat their rights and freedom. However, the infuriation growing stronger and the resistance were unavoidable as British imposed colonists more taxation without their consent. First, Colonies were part of the empire, colonists should be treated as the citizens in Great Britain, and enjoy the

Read More
426 Words | 2 Pages

During the Colonial Era (1492-1763), colonists were justified in waging war against Great Britain; due to the inequitable Stamp Act, the insufferable British oppression, and the perceived tyranny of King George III, the king of Great Britain, however, the colonists were unjustified in some of their actions. In Colonial America, colonists were justified in waging war against Great Britain, because the Stamp Act was unfair and viewed as punishment. Because of the war, Britain had no other choice but to tax the colonists to pay for the debt. For example, according to document 2, the author states that the act was not only for trade but for “the single purpose of levying money.”

Read More
125 Words | 1 Pages

The Stamp Act was a British tax that came directly from the colonies and it was not popular. A stamp had to be put on all the printed material produced in the colonies, due to needing money to finance the empire and putting British troops in North America. The colonists did not want a British army staying in America and were upset that the Stamp Act was imposed without the consent of the colony. People were so unhappy that the Stamp Act led to a riot in 1765 which then opened the door to 50 years of protest and political unrest throughout the Western world. It sparked the fight for liberty (for which the colonists felt violated), and various battles to increase liberty throughout

Read More
613 Words | 3 Pages

In the years leading up to the American Revolution, there was a tense relationship between the colonists and their British rulers. Large gatherings in the colonies to discuss the grievances caused by the actions of the British were common. Patrick Henry applies the rhetorical strategies of allusions and repetition in his “Speech in the Virginia Convention” to assert that the colonists should believe fighting for their freedom and rights is necessary and that they must fight as soon as possible. Although Henry has rather radical beliefs in comparison to the other members of the Convention, he connects with them through religious and literary allusions that are able to convince them of his assertions. In his speech, Henry alludes to

Read More
603 Words | 3 Pages

As a fifth-grader, it is essential to understand the significance of the American Revolutionary War and its impact on American history. The colonists believed that they should have a say in the taxes that were imposed on them. They felt that these taxes were unfair because they were being imposed without their consent. The Stamp Act, in particular, was met with a

Read More
1508 Words | 7 Pages

A. Explain the reasons for English Colonization by doing the Following: A1. Discuss the political motivations for English Imperialism. The main political motivation for English Imperialism was due to the rivalries with its European Counterparts. Initially, European countries were looking for a water passage to China so they would be able to trade for their goods. Spain, who lead the charge, landed in Central and South America, captured gold and silver.

Read More

More about Summary Of The Rights Of The British Colonies By James Otis

Related Topics

Open Document