Summary Of The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire Trial

499 Words2 Pages

Sign Although the evidence pulled by the the distraught citizens is strong, owners Max Blanck and Isaac Harris along with their lawyer Max Steuer have the right to defend themselves and give their side of the case. They claim that they locked the doors in order to keep the workers from stealing as said back in the History.com article when it states “There were two stairways down to the street, but one was locked from the outside to prevent stealing and the other only opened inward.” This quote plainly shows how the doors stopped the workers from exiting. Going along with that, some workers of the factory even said that the doors were actually unlocked and that there was no way to prove that the doors were locked. The article “Summation …show more content…

In this article, the defense attorney for the owners Max Steuer states “Gussie Rapp (witness) told you she used the Washington Place stairs, she used the Washington Place elevator, and she used the Greene Street stairs; and that the Washington Place door was always unlocked and that the key was in the door.” This quote claims that an actual worker of the factory said that the doors were unlocked, making it difficult to find the truth in a case that is now about 100 years old. Both sides saw the situation a little bit differently. The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire Trial was not the only example of differing perspectives in U.S history - in fact, perspective plays a role in our everyday lives, too. Whether it was a fight with a friend or a disagreement over a game during Family Game Night, everyone has their own opinions and versions of the situation. (Example was here) In conclusion, whether it’s the case of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire or your very own life, perspective plays a big role in our lives. You aren’t always going to have the same opinion as someone else - you are two totally different beings who saw the same situation a little bit different. Sometimes it doesn’t matter who is right or wrong; it just means everyone has a different