Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Police brutality injustice
Police brutality injustice
Unnecessary force by police
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Police brutality injustice
Police brutality injustice
Unnecessary force by police
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recently, it has become a popular story on the news where more and more poilce officers across the country are being arrested for innapropiate behavior. Cases where officers are using aggressive force to kicking a peron in the head, tackling a pregnant woman to the ground and pulling a weapon on teenagers at a pool. With some cases where a wrongful death occurs, riots from the community start to grow. Obviously, riots indicate a significant collapse in stability and order within the community and could be viewed as a sign of social breakdown. While such community turmoil could not constantly be concentrated on law enforcement behavior, it, undoubtedly, is the responsibility of the authorities to balance the cost of free speech with the damage it may cause.
In the article, “The Media Underestimate Police Brutality”, Michael Novick focuses on the lack of of coverage associated with police brutality. He argues that police violence should be seen as a pungent act rather than everyday news. Fact-based examples were given that showed the extent of control which police have over the press statements. Novick believes that people deserve to know the whole truth, and in order to do that the police must come completely clean. The author, Novick attempts to inform the reader on the coverage of police brutality, but in the meanwhile he lets his own beliefs get in the way.
The author expands his explanations with various sociological theories. Moreover, he discusses why the poor urban areas attract police officers to patrol them more often. The content of certain chapters is used in sociological and political explanations of police brutality. Holmes, M. D., & Smith, B. W. (2008). Race and police brutality: Roots of an urban dilemma.
One common opinion is that officers should not use more force than is necessary or reasonable, and even then, that force should be used only as a last resort. “Police use force to affect civilians’ conduct. On a day-to-day basis, they do so most often by employing the least degree of force available to them, their mere presence. Cops wear uniforms and drive distinctly marked cars so that, without saying a word, they may have an effect on citizens’ behavior” (Fyfe, 38). When an officer’s presence fails to fulfill the desired conduct, the next course of action for said officer would be verbalization.
A twisted and controversial matter. “Police Violence and the Shifting Definition of ‘Objective Reasonableness’” by Ted Hamilton touches upon
Police officers have vowed their life to protect and serve. They risk their lives every day for their communities. As the last few years have sped past us, police officers have been very aggressive with the force they use when arresting a suspect, or even people in general. According to a Texas article on Civil Liberties and Civil Rights, “police officers typically use force offensively rather than defensively and do so with at least some degree of premeditation.” (Gross,2013, page 167).
The development of the Bomb Squad and SWAT Teams are prime examples of how police departments are militarizing. Supporters of the militarization of police forces state that it is essential to keep up with the potential threats of terrorism and gangs. It is the police’s duty to keep their country safe and if the only way to accomplish this is to militarize the police, it is necessary. While it aids in keeping the community safe, the main reason supporters encourage militarization is that it protects the police officers from being harmed (Sheeler). Their heavy equipment protects them, enabling them to defend the community.
Police officers use the amount of force necessary to ease the situation, arrest an individual, or protect themselves and others from harm. A certain amount of people understand that excessive force is required in different situations. There are moments when police officers will be obligated to use excessive force to calm the situation. For example; Rahtz said, “Then you have others who understand that in some situations, force is not only necessary but is required, if serious, injury or death is avoided” (Rahtz, 2007). Force can be necessary and understood
Police brutality occurs against those of all races and genders. A new form of violence between civilians and police
This term paper will focus on the escalation of force used by law enforcement officers and the less lethal alternatives currently available to them. Use of Force
The reasons brutal police officers are the masters and why the victims are the slaves will be analyzed in this
Police reform has become an increasingly critical issue in the United States over the last few years, particularly following several high-profile incidents of police brutality and excessive use of force against minorities. The police's use of force is a significant issue in many police departments, leading to serious injuries or death and undermining public trust in the police. Scholars and experts have called for comprehensive police reform measures to address systemic issues in law enforcement agencies and rebuild public trust in the police. One of the key issues in police reform is the excessive use of force by law enforcement officers.
Over the years, countries have witnessed many cases of police brutality, which has tremendously increased since the 80’s. Every day, officers are faced with many threatening situations, forcing them to make split-second decisions all the while simultaneously both expecting the worst along and hoping for the best. Police officers shouldn't have more power than any other human-being on this planet just because they wear a badge on their chest especially given the power to take any citizen's rights away, even their lives. Police brutality contains a lot of ethos, racism, and pathos because police are meant to protect society from harm, First of all, police brutality is hypocrisy, police should be properly trained so they do not resort to violence and abuse of its power. It’s illegal for a cop to violate someone's rights; police officers are suppose to be trusted and expected to respect society as a whole.
Law enforcement agents are should behave to a standard that is greater than the average civilian. Police brutality comes from an abuse of power granted to the police. Police brutality is often drawn on by overreaction in certain situations drawn on by panic. Police using excessive force in the United States is a crucial dilemma and must be stopped.
Police brutality is a complex phenomenon, which has widespread effects on today 's society. In recent years, the police have come under serious scrutiny for police brutality, and this has been underscored by the presence of video camcorders. Accompanying this issue, I will provide several examples and recent cases, as well as the related decision making process. Similar emphasis shall be placed upon the understanding, role, and participation of the individual in public policy making. To begin with, I should like to first offer my understanding of police brutality, and as well, as it is expressed in the literature.