ipl-logo

Supreme Court Cases Pros And Cons

471 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Supreme court pros and cons

Did you know that before 1963, under Florida Law, that you might have to defend yourself to the courts if you can’t afford a lawyer? That before 1966 the police did not have to read you your rights? Over the years, the Supreme Court has expanded and interpreted our basic individual rights into something more than what is stated in our written Constitution. Many cases like Miranda v. Arizona, Texas v. Johnson, and Gideon v. Wainwright, have showed the Supreme Court that our freedoms must be broadened and made clear. There are many cases that have been taken to Supreme Court which have strengthened our liberties. For example, in the case Miranda v. Arizona, Ernesto Miranda was arrested and the officer did not read him his rights, like the right to remain silent. As a result, he eventually produced a written and signed confession to the crime. This case expanded our 5th and 6th …show more content…

Additionally, in the Texas v. Johnson case, Joey Johnson organized a group of protesters and marched to Dallas City Hall. Upon arrival, Johnson soaked the American flag in gasoline and lit it on fire. He was then arrested under the Texas law that one is not allowed to vandalize a respected object. His case was taken to Supreme Court and it was decided that his 1st amendment right was infringed. The Supreme Court broadened our 1st amendment right by making it clear that Freedom of Speech is not limited to words, but symbolic actions are included in that right. Finally, this last case, Gideon v. Wainwright, helped strengthen our 6th amendment right. Clarence Earl Gideon broke into a Florida pool hall and stole some beverages and about $5. He was arrested and informed the officers he could not afford a lawyer.

Show More
Related
578 Words | 3 Pages

Gideon then appealed to the Supreme Court who took his case. They reached a unanimous decision that the state of Florida, by denying Gideon an attorney, had violated his Sixth Amendment right. They said “The Sixth Amendment requires states to provide defense attorneys to any indigent criminal defendant charged with a felony or

Read More
819 Words | 4 Pages

The structure of the book has placed it at the top of the reading list for aspiring law students. It effectively maps out the Supreme Court’s ruling history and also the crucial turning point of progressing American civil liberties. Robert F. Kennedy commented on Gideon’s perseverance stating, “If an obscure Florida convict named Clarence Earl Gideon had not sat down in prison with a pencil and paper to write a letter to the Supreme Court; and if the Supreme Court had not taken the trouble to look at the merits in that one crude petition among all the bundles of mail it must receive every day, the vast machinery of

Read More
786 Words | 4 Pages

Clarence Thomas was born on June 23, 1948, in Pin Point, Georgia. His father left his family when he was young. That, and other issues as the years passed led his family into money problems. Clarence and his brother were sent to live with their grandfather and step-grandmother. His grandfather had a major influence on his religious beliefs.

Read More
1108 Words | 5 Pages

McCreary County v. ACLU (2005) Pinson, 4 McCreary County v. ACLU Asher Pinson Liberty High School AP US Government, 2A McCreary County v. ACLU was a significant case for the Establishment Clause, freedom of religion, and the First Amendment itself. This case made its way into the Supreme Court in the later part of 2004, and a decision was reached in the middle of 2005. This case extended the power of the Establishment Clause to prohibit the public display of religious texts in government-funded buildings.

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

1. According to the case law of Illinois v Allen, the US supreme court held that “trial judges confronted with disruptive, contumacious, and stubbornly defiant defendant must be given sufficient discretion to meet the circumstances of each case. The court further observed that at least three constitutionally acceptable avenues exist for dealing with a defiant defendant, in the case of Ms. Roberts she was a very defiant defendant. The avenues are 1.

Read More
803 Words | 4 Pages

For example, the 1964 Heart of Atlanta Motel Inc. v. United States and the 2009 Ricci v. DeStefano Supreme Court cases. In the Heart of Atlanta Motel Inc. v. United States Supreme Court case, “the owner of the motel argued that the federal government overstepped its authority and violated the 5th amendment. the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government can force businesses to abide by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 through the Interstate Commerce Clause in the Constitution” (Civil Rights Act of 1964 Explained). In addition, the 2009 Ricci v. DeStefano Supreme Court case used the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as evidence. “The case consisted of a group of firefighters, who brought suit against the city of New Haven, Connecticut for invalidating a test that would have earned them promotions.

Read More
883 Words | 4 Pages

Arizona ruling eliminated the fear of the accused from torture and coercion and notified individuals of their rights that they otherwise wouldn’t have known that they had. The ruling explicitly stated that if a person was not informed of their Fifth Amendment right, then compelling pressures could cause a person who otherwise not have spoken, to incriminate themselves (Document J). In the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, it had not specifically stated that a suspect must be informed of their rights before they are questioned. The ruling of Miranda v. Arizona finally cleared up the confusion concerning the rights of the accused and self-incrimination and required officials of the law to read out the warning known as the Miranda warning to anyone they may question. Additionally, manuals such as Fundamentals of Criminal Investigation, specified the rules to be used during interrogations to prevent coercion (Document F).

Read More
1023 Words | 5 Pages

Arizona case argued whether or not “the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination extend to the police interrogation of a suspect” (Oyez). Miranda, after two hours of interrogation, gave a written confession to the police saying that he was guilty. However, the police did confess that they had never informed Miranda of his Fifth Amendment rights, which included a right to an attorney, and because of this, the argument was made that the police had violated Miranda's Fifth Amendment rights. Warren, who was a part of the majority, in this case, decided in favor of Miranda, and that “the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination is available in all settings. Therefore, prosecution may not use statements arising from a custodial interrogation of a suspect unless certain procedural safeguards were in place” (Oyez).

Read More
279 Words | 2 Pages

I believe that a person can predict a decision that the Supreme Court Justices make because of their views are liberal or conservative. Because of their views on either side, they deal with cases by finding loopholes to interpret the laws to make it suitable for the case that works on their side (Pollack, 2017). The final legislation and authority in this country are The United States Supreme Court, despite the objective decision making they decide constitutional cases which are sometimes far from a neutral outcome. The federal judges and the Supreme Court Justices and appointed by the president because it is a political contest between the liberals and the conservatives so that when there is a substantial issue like abortion, there is only

Read More
1328 Words | 6 Pages

Allisha Beggs PS110 Gordon Vurusic April 16, 2018 The Supreme Court In 1788, the United States first established the Judicial, Executive and Legislative Branches of the Federal government in the Constitution, Article II specifically outlines the powers of the Court. “The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this constitution, the rise of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority.” (US const.

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

In the year 2006, the Stolen Valor Act made it illegal to make medals of Honor. The case brought forth to us describes issues brought about by this act. In United States v. Fields, Abel Fields attended a meeting where he proclaimed that he had military experience, and that he earned a Purple Heart. He had made false statements, and in turn was convicted, and had to pay a $1,000 fine. Fields felt that his First Amendment rights had been violated.

Read More
890 Words | 4 Pages

Arizona, Were his rights violated? It is obvious that Ernesto 's rights were not clear to him. Before his interrogation, Miranda was unaware of his rights and when he made his confession, they were entirely thrown out. In 1965, the court agreed to heir his case. Miranda 's case won 5-4 and a statement was made.

Read More
655 Words | 3 Pages

Through these two pieces of evidence we are able to see that the Constitution does favor individual rights by its limiting of the Federal Government’s power and its securing of individual

Read More
644 Words | 3 Pages

This landmark case affirmed that the 6th Amendment applies to all states under the 14th Amendment. Not only did the video show the importance of the amendments to the constitution, it also demonstrated the possible pitfalls of judicial review, but also its ability to ensure the personal rights provided by the constitution are not

Read More
372 Words | 2 Pages

Judicial review is designed to provide individuals with a right to a hearing or a right to raise a grievance. Unfortunately, limitations of the mechanism are prevalent, and it is essential to identify these incompetencies. Significantly, 2012 saw the government propose provisions in an attempt to reform judicial review with the overall objective to reduce burdens placed on public authorities. Despite this, the policies implemented resulted in increased difficulties accessing judicial review and arguably the reforms went too far protecting public authorities, placing individuals at an unfair disadvantage.

Read More

More about Supreme Court Cases Pros And Cons

Related Topics

Open Document