ipl-logo

Supreme Court Justices: Impeachment In The United States

929 Words4 Pages

Under Section 1 in Article III of the United States Constitution, it states “The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior, and shall, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.” This means that Supreme Court Justices are allowed to hold office as long as they choose and can only be removed from their position by impeachment. It is not directed stated, but it provides the ability for Justices to serve life term limits and not be required to resign after a …show more content…

The basic point of lifetime appointment was to assume the integrity of the power granted to each Supreme Court Justice and protect them against interference from either the legislative or executive …show more content…

The idea of life tenure may have made sense in the time of the Framers, but things have changed in the United States and the Supreme Court is given a much stronger power than it had back then. Many different studies and arguments have shown that the mental capacities of a Justice diminish as they increase in age and the longer they remain on the court, the more they part from their original ideology. Other arguments are made that life tenure helps the justices on the Supreme Court make decisions that would benefit our country as whole. In states’ Supreme Courts things are done a little different in almost every state, except for the exception of one or two states. Most state Supreme Courts have established term limits for their justices on the court. This allows for new judges to come in and replace the old ones and bring new ideas and opinions to the court, but it also can cause problems for the ideology of the state as well. With new justices being appointed to the court, it takes away from the idea of outside interference and can allow for justices to be appointed to favor one specific side. The main point behind all my research is to see whether it would be more effective to have term limits established for justices on the United States Supreme Court, or all

Show More
Related

Summary Of Gerald Rosenberg's Book 'The Hollow Hope'

710 Words | 3 Pages

Alex Frost Values: Law & Society 9/23/2014 The Hollow Hope Introduction and Chapter 1 Gerald Rosenberg begins his book by posing the questions he will attempt to answer for the reader throughout the rest of the text: Under what conditions do courts produce political and social change? And how effective have the courts been in producing social change under such past decisions as Roe v. Wade and Brown v. Board of Education? He then works to define some of the principles and view points 'currently' held about the US Supreme court system.

Read More

How Did Fdr Build The Power Of The Executive Branch

645 Words | 3 Pages

The bill would mainly serve to grant the President power to appoint an additional Justice to the U.S. Supreme court, up to a maximum of six, for every court member over the age seventy years and six

Read More

Internal Affairs And Policies Of George Washington During The New Nation Period

156 Words | 1 Pages

Also, the Judiciary act established the number of justices

Read More

Judicial Crisis Dbq

797 Words | 4 Pages

In the year 1803, an ambivalent, undetermined principle lingered within the governing minds. The government and its “justified” Constitution were thought to be fully explained, until a notion occurred that would bring individuals to question the authority and their limit for empowerment. To end his days as president, John Adams named fifty-eight people from his political party to be federal judges, filing positions created by the Judiciary Act of 1800, under the frequently listed Organic Act. His secretary John Marshall delivered and sealed most of the commissions, however seventeen of them had not yet been delivered before Adams’s departure in 1801. On top of that, Thomas Jefferson refused to appoint those seventeen people because they were

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Judges Being Appointed

167 Words | 1 Pages

The quality of judges would without a doubt increase if they were appointed. However, I do not agree with the idea of judges being appointed. When looking at the partisan aspect you notice several possible issues with one issue being, is that individual the right person to do the job. Partisan election of judges allows for an individual that may not be as qualified for the job to be elected into the position. Nevertheless the partisan election of judges gives the voters what they want based on party affiliation along with qualifications.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Term Limits Of Congress

597 Words | 3 Pages

This has been a topic in mind for many years. Should members of Congress have term limits? There are pros and cons of Congress having or not having term limits that many people use to argue their opinion. There can be benefits to term limits. This can be a way for new people to come into office every couple of years to have more of a variety of new opinions.

Read More

Marbury Vs Madison Court Case

910 Words | 4 Pages

This greatly expanded the power that the Supreme Court (Judicial branch) has. This also helped establish the judicial branch as being seen as an equal power alongside the executive and legislative

Read More

Accomplishments Of John Marshall

299 Words | 2 Pages

To ensure an independent Judiciary and to protect judges from partisan

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Judicial Selection Methods

462 Words | 2 Pages

In addition to judicial selection methods, at the federal level, the president and senate get to appoint seats to judges, in which they will have for life. In my opinion, I think this selection method is good to some extent because I trust that the president and senate have good judgment when it comes to picking judges that will be independent, fair, and accountable. At the state level, electing judges varies from state to state. In

Read More

Term Limits In The Supreme Court

339 Words | 2 Pages

This shows that term limits in the Supreme Court became more important. For example, if they have more mature members, they would understand the law, and would understand the politics and their decisions on the society. Mr. Ingraham stated

Read More

Should The Constitution Have Term Limits?

497 Words | 2 Pages

With term limit there is less time for a member of congress be corrupted by reelection campaigns and work harder on the issues that the people the represent wish to have worked on, and if not eventually even with reelection the will be out of congress. I believe term limits would correlate with higher congressional approval ratings, and I also believe higher congressional approval ratings would cause the voting population to be more passionate on who represents them because the know there is a much higher chance of their representative actually representing them, causing higher voter turnout. This is a succinct summary of why I believe congressional term limits should be the next constitutional amendment. I will end this essay noting that a much deeper examination must be done on this subject nationally and culturally so that we the people can formulate an answer to keep The Republic from becoming “ The

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Term Limits In Congress

1499 Words | 6 Pages

Many people believe in term limits. “In the 1900’s, public opinion polls showed that 70 to 80 percent of the American public supported the idea of term limits for Congress” (Feinberg, 1996). Term limits in Congress can be argued that the politicians who have been in office for decades could have be out of new ideas or have become comfortable in their position. It seems only fair that if others involved in politics, such as the president, can only serve for a number of terms than Congress should be faced with the same. “Term limits encourage politicians to work quickly and efficiently to pass good legislation that immediately benefits the electorate, and to prevent the partisan bickering and infighting that often gums up legislatures” (Issues

Read More

Judges Vs Federal Judges Essay

509 Words | 3 Pages

Federal Judges and Supreme Court Justices The process for electing a federal judge is both a simple, yet complicated one. A number of things take place between the need for a nominee and the appointment to a position. The basis for the nomination and appointment of federal judges and Supreme Court Justices is the Appointments Clause (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2) of the United States Constitution: “The President...shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law....” First a vacancy must be present at which time the President can make a nomination.

Read More

Essay On Judicial Selection

801 Words | 4 Pages

We enjoy our ability to exercise our rights in the voting booth. With that in mind, electing judges serves the will of the people and makes us feel as though we have a measured amount of control over the judicial system. This requires judicial candidates to expose their lives to public scrutiny and represent their voting pool. Conversely, appointed judges would have an easier time concealing truths about themselves that they would prefer the public not see. Favors among close circles of officials are likely easier to be traded in secret.

Read More

• What Are The Advantages And Disadvantages To Electing Judges?

360 Words | 2 Pages

There are many advantages and disadvantages to electing judges. There are more disadvantages to electing judges then there are advantages. The few advantages are; the people get to choose the judge they feel will make the best decisions and everyone likes to be a part of democracy and judging running for election may spend more time in the community learning about the population. A judge should be a non-partisan individual who ensures that laws are upheld and fair evidence-based decisions are made. Having a judge campaign for reelection seems counterproductive, the judge could be put into a situation where they have to rule on a campaign supporter and how they would be able to make a non-biased ruling.

Read More

More about Supreme Court Justices: Impeachment In The United States

Open Document