ipl-logo

Agricola's Ambition Of The Briton Tacitus

1069 Words5 Pages

“It is no use trying to escape their arrange by submission or good behavior. They have pillagedd the world… If an enemy is rich, they are greedy, if he is poor, they crave glory...They make a desert and call it peace.” (Tacitus 22). Despite Tacitus not being present during this speech made by Calgacus who was one of the leaders of the Britons.This second hand account of the speech granted Tacitus the ability to put up a mirror of Roman ambition. Tacitus represented the best qualities of Roman attributes through his father in law Agricola. A man to which through Tacitus’ writings the manifestation of Roman perfection. Tacitus view of the flaws of Roman society were it’s ambition. Greed and self service to individual rather than service to the commonwealth. Tacitus’ represented the Britons response to the Roman presence in Britons by bringing up comparisons of slavery. Tacitus views of the Roman empire could suggest …show more content…

Tacitus views of Roman societies flaws are Ambition, greed, and service to the self rather than the common wealth. To further perpetuate the idea of self service over the service to the common wealth tacitus writes this one agricola’s early success in britain “ when distirctionaraused unfavorable reaction and a great reputation was no less dangerous than a bad one”. Tacitus 6 Tacitus writing explaining that despite Agricola bringing sucess and glory to the empire as a while and agricola being the man that seeks no special regonition. Despite the his sucesses bring him at odds against those within the higher echolons of government

Show More
Related

Roman Government Dbq Analysis

111 Words | 1 Pages

Roman citizens had come to consideration that they, indeed, did have a poor government. The Roman government gave an unjust life to people based on their social rank (Document E). This led to the citizens not appreciating the government as well as the Empire. Most of the emperors in Rome were assassinated so it gives the citizens the intention that if you did not like the emperor you can just kill them (Document A).This tells the reader that it was hard to govern Rome because they constantly kept replacing emperors. Considering that Rome did not have a stable ruling system, citizens of Rome began to doubt and not depend on their government.

Read More

Analysis Of Aeneid And Sallust's Conspiracy Of Catiline

938 Words | 4 Pages

The Romans emerged from Italy and formed their culture that can find its roots among an array of native tribes and Greek colonies that populated Italy. There are two parts of the foundation of a Roman’s identity that stemmed from the cultural influences that produced the Romans, their culture and their ideals. The first component of the foundation of the Roman identity is the usage and the incorporation of others’ myths into their own etiological myth. The second part stems from these myths that made the Romans believe that their existence and success was the result of fate. By looking into Virgil’s Aeneid and Sallust’s Conspiracy of Catiline one can see that this two-part foundation produced a society and people that embodied this idea that they were the best parts of all the cultures

Read More

Plutarch's The Life Of Marius Analysis

1492 Words | 6 Pages

The Life of Marius, written by Plutarch, is a fascinating ancient source detailing the career of the Roman Gaius Marius, 127-86BC. While there are interpretive and reliability issues, the Life of Marius is a particularly useful and significant source. It is our only extensive primary source on Marius, who was a key political figure of late Republican Rome. Additionally, Plutarch’s work indicates not only many crucial military and political development in Rome in the time period, but also gives a reflection of Plutarch’s own Rome and its values and political climate.

Read More

How Does Tacitus Use Irony In Julius Caesar

585 Words | 3 Pages

This ties into Tacitus’s many words for death and dying because it shows the difference between appearance and reality, between what was rumor and what was true. Augustus seemed to be a good ruler of Rome, a ruler that listened to the opinions of the Senate and the Roman people. In truth, Augustus employed nepotism and the cronyism, appointing his friends and relatives into power underhandedly. Using words and phrases meaning “expired,” “pushed aside,” “conceded life,” Tacitus makes the potential murder of the Roman politicians more palatable and less sinister. He leaves the door open for Agrippa’s death to potentially be due to Livia’s hand, instead of outright saying that Livia murdered Agrippa.

Read More

Gladiator Historical Accuracy

992 Words | 4 Pages

As a writer at Gladiators Monthly, I am examining the historical accuracy of the movie Gladiator. There are aspects of Gladiator that do and do not hold true to the historical accuracy of the Romans under Commodus. This essay will show how the depiction of Commodus has both accurate and inaccurate qualities, while the portrayal of the Roman crowd determining the fate of the gladiators is quite accurate. In reality, Commodus did not kill his father, Marcus Aurelius, nor did he reign for such a short period of time.

Read More

How Did Pax Romana Change Society

978 Words | 4 Pages

Old decaying temples were also restored by Emperor Augustus, in attempt to rebuild old moral values. Though the rot had already begun to eat away at the Rome’s morals. The historian Tacitus recorded Calgacus, a leader of the Britons, in addressing the Romans, “we kept even our eyes free from the defilement of tyranny today the boundary of Britain is exposed; beyond us lies no nation, nothing but waves and rocks and the Romans, more deadly still than they, for you find in them an arrogance which no reasonable submission can elude”. Calacus continues “They are unique in being as violently tempted to attack the poor as the wealthy. Robbery, butchery, rapine, the liars call Empire; they create desolation and call it peace.

Read More

Julius Caesar Why Was Brutus Noble

406 Words | 2 Pages

Was Brutus Noble? In Shakespeare 's’ The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar, one of the main characters, Marcus Brutus, is found dead by the noble Mark Antony, and is called “The Noblest Roman Of Them All” (Julius Caesar Act 5, scene 5, 68–72). Antony 's’ statement is a true one for many reasons. The first reason would be that Brutus was a man who valued his friendships over all else.

Read More

Powerful Words In Julius Caesar

521 Words | 3 Pages

While Brutus spoke well, but had no real factual standpoint, Antony gave many examples of Caesar’s achievements. In his speech he uses Pathos, Logos, Ethos, and Situational Irony to sway his audience. He uses Brutus’ and Cassius’ precious honor and Caesar’s achievements against them, saying, “When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept./ Ambition should be made of sterner stuff./ Yet Brutus says he was ambitious,/ And Brutus is an honorable man” (3.2.90-93). In this statement and many other statements following the same pattern Antony degrades the honor and the arguments of Caesar’s ambition that were made by Brutus and the other conspirators.

Read More

Similarities Between Roman And Byzantine Empires

665 Words | 3 Pages

An Abundance of Empires The 5th century was one of the most important time periods in history as it was the time of rising and falling empires. Every empire both starts and finishes with a great impact on those that follow and for the future that is to come. In the midst of the 400s, the Roman Empire was on its great decline, reaching the end of its long rule. While its neighboring empire, the Byzantine Empire, was on the hugely significant rise to the top and became the dominant standing command.

Read More

Fall Of The Roman Republic Essay

1512 Words | 7 Pages

The composition and the governing structure of the Roman republic was not uniform throughout its existence, but some of the fundamental elements of its government came into being in the immediate aftermath of the monarchy’s collapse. Therefore, it is unsurprising that many of these institutions were created in reaction to the monarchy and its failures, and thus were shaped by this relationship. For example, the fundamental opposition to monarchy and the rule of kings that came with the experience of the Kingdom of Rome, remained quite strong in the Roman mindset throughout the existence of the Republic and into the beginnings of the Roman Empire, and its influence can be seen throughout Roman political discourse especially in the discussion

Read More

Renaissance Humanism In 'The Praise Of Folly'

1629 Words | 7 Pages

Erasmus, a Renaissance humanist, portrays folly as a character named so in The Praise of Folly to show his appreciation for the role foolishness plays in the human life. For all earthly existence, Erasmus’s Folly states that “you'll find nothing frolic or fortunate that it owes not to me [folly]” (The Praise of Folly, 14). Moreover, she states that “fools are so vastly pleasing to God; the reason being, I suggest, that just as great princes look suspiciously on men who are too clever, and hate them – as Julius Caesar suspected and hated Brutus and Cassius while he did not fear drunken Antony at all…they take delight in duller and simpler souls” (Folly, 115). Folly, indeed, plays a major role in determining the fate of Antony and Brutus after

Read More

Examples Of Brutus's Idealism

762 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus has negatively affected the outlook of Rome and created more harm than good for the situation. Not only did it harm Rome, but it brought his own demise and hallucinations of Caesar’s ghost. Brutus’s speech to the plebeians after Caesar’s death, about his dilemma and his viewpoint towards Caesar, influenced the viewpoints of the plebeians and causes them to believe he is the best roman until Antony speaks to them. Brutus’s idealism led to his own death later on and brought him more misery than his idealism could

Read More

Traits Of Brutus In Julius Caesar

935 Words | 4 Pages

(II, i, 53-55) which allows to say that he wants Rome to be just and do whatever it takes to maintain it away from any threat. Indeed, Brutus states this very clearly when he says, “If it’s for the good of all Romans, I’d do it even if it meant my death. Let the gods give me good luck only as long as I love honor more than I fear death.” (I, ii, 86-88), he explicitly says that the good of the majority is over any feeling or personal benefit which in this case is the love of Caesar for him and viceversa, and the throne. To conclude, Brutus is a complex character that is characterized by three recurrent traits: his well-intention, his hypocrisy, and his naivet.

Read More

Germania Summary

896 Words | 4 Pages

In Germania, Publius Cornelious Tacitus analyzes the culture of the tribes in the region, in order to aid in the development of the Roman empire. Tacitus writes about both the good and bad aspects of the Germanic culture. Although he is writing about Germania in a way which makes it seem as though he favors their ways, the major purpose is to persuade the Roman empire into strengthening their culture through intimidation. Germania was the Roman and Greek word for the region in northern Europe inhabited mainly by Teutonic Suebians or Gothic peoples. It stretches from the Danube to the Baltic Sea, and from the Rhine in the west to the Vistula.

Read More

Julius Caesar And Macbeth Comparison

1200 Words | 5 Pages

In “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”, Caesar’s main flaw is his arrogance and ambition, which both led to his doom. His overconfidence and self-love blinded him of the sharp thorns growing from his sides which were masked with loyalty and care. Viciously assassinated by the closest people in his heart, Julius Caesar had been known for centuries as the blind conceited man. On the other hand, loyalty conflicted Brutus, who is argued to be the protagonist of the tragedy. Although he was loyal to Caesar, he was loyal to his nation too and thought that the death of Caesar would be for the best for the nation.

Read More

More about Agricola's Ambition Of The Briton Tacitus

Related Topics

Open Document