Taming Of The Shrew Misogynist Analysis

Taming of the Shrew There’s been a lot of questions and discussions about if Shakespeare was being a little bit too cruel or bias in the way he represented women in the play, Taming of the Shrew. There’s a lot of different opinions and in my personal one I think he is non-misogynistic. It was a just a comedy not an insult to woman. People are just being too sensitive about it, and just looking more to it than there actually is. How can we compare or judge something that was written in before the 1600s. The people who believe that Shakespeare was a misogynist, there first argument is always about how badly Petruchio treated Katherine. Katherine was a shrew in the beginning, and all he wanted was her to get a bit of a reality check. He was treating her like how she was treating the rest of the world. She had a really bad attitude about everything and always contradicted what everybody said. No one really see it but Petruchio fell for Katherine the first time he saw her. Suddenly, in act IV, scene V, Katherine was, as you may call it, tame, but it was more that she finally gets that it’s not okay to disrespect people for no reason and that she needs to better herself. She just needed to learn to be more cooperated, and appreciate what

He basically said Katherine had to marry before Bianca. People have used this as an argument, they claim they think it is unfair how Katherine’s dad is basically making her marry someone she doesn’t even know, and she has no right to have a say for it. They are also taking personally the fact that there was money involve in order to get Katherine’s hand in marriage. Back then, this is how things work. You can’t compare this whole marriage arrangement to this generation. This was a topic that was commonly accepted back