The targets in goal 13 vary on their ability to perform measurably. To begin, Target 13.1 can be measured by comparing how well a country deals with one natural disaster vs. another. However, other factors must be considered such as the intensity of the disaster, the resources available, etc. Target 13.2 is easily measurable, by comparing national policies and seeing whether climate change measures really have been implemented. Target 13.3 however, is arguably measurable as different strategies to raise awareness, improve education and human capacity are all subjective measures. Targets 13.a and 13.b can appear as measurable to one, as they focus on specific organizations and deadlines, i.e. focusing on the commitment undertaken by developed country parties in 13.a, and in 13.b, the role of particular groups such as women, youth and disregarded communities. Hence, some of these targets are clearly measurable, while others are more indefinite.
According to Karl- Göran Mäler, resiliency is a measurable value, as he describes it as the amount an ecosystem can withhold without changing its regime (Mäler 2007). On the Sustainable Development Solutions Network indicator report, resiliency is measured by the number of losses from natural disasters, both by climate-related incidents as well as non-climate connected, i.e. through
…show more content…
According to the Renewable Energy Policy Network, governments are increasingly enacting RE policies in different countries to address climate change among other issues (2010). For example, countries with a renewable energy target to fight climate change almost doubled from 2005 to 2010 (REN21, 2010). Thus, 13.2 is being put into motion, where countries around the world are looking to forms of renewable energy to address climate change issues among various other environmental