ipl-logo

Texas Rising Analysis

1302 Words6 Pages

History Channel’s Texas Rising is a historical drama that follows the fight for Texas independence after the Battle of the Alamo and the rise of the Texas Rangers. It shows how General Sam Houston leads a group of Texas Rangers into a war against General Santa Anna. General Houston and the Rangers fight against insuperable odds to defeat the Mexicans and gain independence. The miniseries is enthralling to watch with compelling characters and an engaging storyline. However, Texas Rising is not historically accurate. It is not a good show to watch if someone wants accurate information on the Mexican War. Texas Rising covers the Mexican War and the rise of the Texas Rangers, and while it’s fascinating to watch, it is not historically accurate. …show more content…

It has a little bit of everything, including death, betrayal, romance, and a little comedy. Nevertheless, while Texas Rising is fun to watch, it is not entirely historically accurate. Texas Rising shows Emily West at the Alamo, however, the real Emily West was captures by Mexican troops on April 16, 1836. She may or may not have been with Santa Anna during the Battle of San Jacinto. If she was in the tent, it was not by choice. In Texas Rising, Santa Anna is shown shooting prisoners at the Alamo. Based on eyewitnesses, it is very unlikely that he himself shot those captured. In Texas Rising, Colonel Portilla is portrayed as a cruel and bloodthirsty officer. He was even shown executing Colonel Fannin and his troops. Historians claim that Portilla actually brooded over having to execute the Texans at Goliad. He even let some of the Texans escape. Also, the show depicts a man who calls himself Lucifer that kills many Mexicans after surviving the Alamo. There were no survivors of the real Alamo. The Mexicans piled the bodies, put wood between them, and burned them. There is no way someone could have escaped after being mistaken as dead. The location in the show is not totally right. The landscape of Texas is green and heavily wooded, while in the show there are mountains and barren deserts. The Karankawa Indians lived more than 80 miles away from the Texans in real life, and …show more content…

It shows how General Houston led his group of soldiers against the Mexicans and their general, Santa Anna. The show is enthralling to watch with its compelling storyline and interesting characters. The show includes death, betrayal, romance, and comedy that makes it entertaining to watch. However, there are many times when Texas Rising is not historically accurate. If someone was looking for a show to get accurate information on the Mexican War, this is not the show to watch. Nevertheless, it is a good show to watch just for fun. Even with its inaccuracy on a few events, Texas Rising is a fascinating show about the fight for Texas

Show More
Related
1221 Words | 5 Pages

(pg. 345-348) This book shows that there is much more to the “story” of the Alamo than what is flashed onto the big screen. Many of the details surrounding the main events have now been combined together in an eye-opening way.

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

Americans were outraged over the border dispute at the Nueces and the Rio Grande rivers, and Mexicans were irate with America’s annexation of Texas. President James K. Polk availed in the atmosphere of animosity, hurrying to place troops on conflicted land. On May 9, 1846, he found his cause for war. Mexican and American troops had engaged in combat on April 24, which led American blood spilt on contended soil. However, through all their fighting spirit, the Americans faithfully ignored their own mistreatment of the Mexicans.

Read More
969 Words | 4 Pages

“In exchange for his freedom, Santa Anna signed a treaty recognizing Texas’ independence” (Battle of San Jacinto, 2015). General Houston and his army were heavly inspired for victory following the massacres at the Alamo and Goliad. Santa Anna lost the Battle of San Jacinto due his previous viciousness, arrogance, and misuse of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) assets effectively. Had Santa Anna not made these mistakes, the Battle of San Jacinto would have turned out differently and Texas may have not won its independence from Mexico (Wright, n.d.). Introduction

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

This war happened mainly because the U.S. wanted to expand to the Pacific Ocean to fulfill their Manifest Destiny, trying to take away Mexico’s land. Mexico refused to to give land to the U.S. The big question is whether the U.S. was justified in fighting Mexico in the Mexican-American War. The United States was justified in going to war with Mexico because Manifest Destiny, too much Mexican interference, and Texas was invaded. One reason the Mexican War was justified was Manifest Destiny. In Document A, John O’Sullivan writes: “Texas is now ours...Let their reception into the “family be frank, kindly, and cheerful….”

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

He presents his opinions based on facts and reasoning, and enlightens his readers with many truths that had been buried and hidden behind false beliefs. While digging deeper into myths surrounding the Alamo, Crisp uncovers hidden truths involving other historian’s information about facts like Davy Crockett’s memorable death (p. 65), the misquoted Houston speech (p. 49), and the validity of the de le Peña

Read More
243 Words | 1 Pages

Why did Texans fight in the Civil War? Texans fought in the Civil War for three reasons: To protect states’ rights, the love for Texas, and to preserve slavery. Texans fought with the Confederate against the Union for freedom and the preservation of slavery. This was the start of a violent war that changed the United States forever… One reason why Texans fought in the Civil War was to protect states rights.

Read More
465 Words | 2 Pages

Was the United States Justified in Going to War With Mexico? Who started the Mexican-American War? Firstly, The United States went to Mexico in 1846. Texas declared its independence from Mexico in 1836. Certainly, Americans were being extremely greedy and wanted more and more land.

Read More
1390 Words | 6 Pages

Sam Houston was constantly sending out runners for reconnaissance reports on the position of the Mexican army and how many men were in the camp. He knew the land and what area’s to avoid because of flooding. Retreating when the Mexican army got near was Sam’s way of using time on his side. Sam knew it was just a matter of time before he would be forced to fight the Mexican army.

Read More
186 Words | 1 Pages

Then on February 23, an army led by General Lopez de Santa Anna attacked the Alamo with a force

Read More
1199 Words | 5 Pages

Jesús Velasco-Márquez, a modern-day Mexican professor of studies wrote an article in 2006 about the Mexican-American War. He said, “US historians refer to this event as ‘The Mexican-American War’, while in Mexico, we prefer to use the term ‘The U.S. Invasion... From Mexico’s point of view, the annexation of Texas to the United States was inadmissible for both legal and security reasons. ’’’ (Velasco-Márquez, 12). During the time of the independence of Texas, Mexico was ruled by the dictator General Antonio López de Santa Anna.

Read More
809 Words | 4 Pages

A. The Battle of the Alamo wasn’t the only battle between the Texans and Mexicans. 1. The first battle was the battle of Gonzales. 2.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Briefly, in the evolution of the Texas political system, Texas’s history has been through many situations that shaped the political structure in Texas to become to what it is today. Many changes were responsible for the impact in the history of Texas such as the Texas revolution, the Alamo war with Mexico, military reconstruction act in 1867, etc. Before the war with Mexico, one of the most important impact in Texas history was the Republic of Texas Constitution in 1836. Texas and Mexico have an escalating tension and is responsible for the new change in the Texas state constitution. For the cause of the Republic of Texas Constitution in 1836, Texas begins by declaring its independence in 1836, established the Republic of Texas, and decided to adopt the new constitution.

Read More
1171 Words | 5 Pages

At that time, only about 75,000 Mexican citizens lived north of the Rio Grande. As a result, U.S. forces led by Stephen W. Kearny and Robert F. Stockton were able to conquer those lands. Taylor advancing, and captured Monterrey in September. With the losses adding up, Mexico turned to old standby General Antonio López de Santa Anna, the strongman who had been living in exile in Cuba. Santa Anna convinced Polk that, if allowed to return to Mexico, he would end the war on terms positive to the United States.

Read More
1083 Words | 5 Pages

Although the United States war against Mexico resulted in the gaining of America’s most valuable land, the war itself wasn’t legitimate because of the revolution in Texas, motivation for superiority, and the U.S. government’s actions. To begin, the Texans began an unreasonable war because they didn’t follow Mexico’s laws and conditions. When Mexico started selling cheap land, they set conditions for the people moving in. The people had to convert to Catholicism, learn Spanish, become a Mexican citizen, and have no slaves. Many Americans didn’t like being told what to do, and disobeyed the rules and laws.

Read More
568 Words | 3 Pages

As stated before, the US was justified in going to war with Mexico because of three reasons, Americans were killed, Texas was already annexed, and Manifest Destiny allows it. The United states had many superb reasons for going to war with Mexico. This essay is significant because it helps explain the United States’ choice to go to war with

Read More

More about Texas Rising Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document