ipl-logo

Texas V Johnson Majority Opinion Analysis

800 Words4 Pages

People all over the world, in their own way all share the same goal of acceptance. The reality of this goal, is that a lot of people are not accepted. In the stories “Texas v. Johnson Majority Opinion” by William Brennan, and “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, and in the film Bullied by Bill Brummel, they all show examples of how some people are not accepted. They are not accepted in the stories, because they are different then others and people make opinions about them without knowing them. These selections show when people are not accepted, they will feel depressed and unwanted. Despite people's differences, they all have the same goal of wanting to be accepted and treated equally. Bullied by Bill Brummel shows Jamie, a gay boy that was bullied …show more content…

Johnson Majority Opinion, there are different view about how the flag should be treated. In this story Texas doesn’t approve of the flag to be burnt, but Johnson believes it is ok for the flag to be burnt because it is our right to protest. “We decline, therefore, to create for the flag an exception to the joust of principles protected by the First Amendment. . . . To say that the government has an interest in encouraging proper treatment of the flag, however, is not to say that it may criminally punish a person for burning a flag as a means of political Protest” (pg. 15 lines 1-6). He is saying that they can’t punish anyone because it is the right to protest in the First Amendment. Johnson accepted the flag to be burnt because he thought you should be able to express yourself however you want. “We decline, therefore, to create for the flag an exception to the joust of principles protected by the First Amendment” (pg. 15 lines 1-2). Johnson believes that anyone expressing themselves without hurting others should be protected why expressing themselves. Although some people believe it is disrespectful to burn the flag, we as American have the right to protest in a non-violent manner. Whether someone believe burning the flag is alright or not, they still want to be treated equal despite their

Show More
Related

Desecration Law: The Case Of Johnson Vs. Texas

391 Words | 2 Pages

Introductory paragraph “The flag is one of the most recognizable symbol of the United States.”      During the case of Johnson vs. Texas, I believe that Johnson was exercising his rights to free speech but I truly think that he should have done it somewhere else then a public square, someone could have gotten hurt by the flames of the burning flag, or Johnson could have gotten hurt because he was burning the flag around people who love the United States flag. I agree with the fact that Johnson was sentenced to 1 year in jail, he burned the Flag in Texas and in Texas they have a desecration law of violating the flag. From my own point of view, I think Johnson wasn’t exercising his rights to free speech but, he did it in the most absolutely

Read More

Texas Vs Johnson Case Study

470 Words | 2 Pages

Dissenting opinion for Johnson Is there any sort of consequences to someone if they burn the American Flag? In the U.S Supreme Court case “Texas v. Johnson”, Johnson was jailed by the start of Texas due to the desecration of the American Flag. The U.S. Supreme Court accepted his case, and the majority opinion of the case decided it was not a criminal offence to burn a flag because of the First Amendment. We the dissenting opinion believe that the burning of the American Flag should be a criminal offence.

Read More

Texas Vs Johnson Pros And Cons

1872 Words | 8 Pages

Texas v. Johnson (1989) centers around the issue of whether burning the American flag should be considered expressive conduct that is protected by the First Amendment. Gregory Lee Johnson was convicted of the desecration of a venerated object when he burned a flag outside the 1984 Republican National Convention in protest of President Ronald Reagan's policies. There was a Texas statute in place which prohibited the intentional desecration of a venerated object, considered to be public monuments, places of worship or burial, and state or national flags.

Read More

Colin Kaepernick's Freedom Of The Protester: The First Amendment

670 Words | 3 Pages

The 1st amendment “The First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition.” (First amendment, 1789) Which means that he has his own freedom of what to talk. Moreover, there was a case in taxes that a man called Gregory L. Johnson burned the USA flag as a way of his protesting. This time, the Supreme Court stated that “In a controversial decision, the Supreme Court, by the closest possible margin of a 5-to-4 vote, held that a person has a right to express disagreement with governmental policies by burning the American flag.”

Read More

Summary Of Majority Opinions By William Brennan

253 Words | 2 Pages

The general argument made by author William J. Brennan in his work, “Majority Opinion,” is that it is legal to burn the flag if it is a form of political protest. More specifically, Brennan argues that we can not criminally punish people for burning a flag: the only thing we can do is convince them that they are wrong. He writes that they only thing we can do is “ Persuade them that they are wrong.” In this passage, Brennan suggests that criminally punishing a person for burning the flag will decrease the values of the flag by opposing the First Amendment. In conclusion, Brennan’s belief is that we should not punish people for burning the flag, but convince them that they are wrong.

Read More

Gregory Lee Johnson's Impact On The US

1550 Words | 7 Pages

After he was appealed, Texas decided to appeal the case again, this time to the Supreme Court. June 21, 1989, The Supreme Court came to a decision. It was a close decision with a 5-4 win in Johnson's favor. The high court agreed that no matter how offensive to some, symbolic speech is protected by the First Amendment. There had been many other cases before this one that had been about desecrating or burning the american flag.

Read More

Texas V. Johnson Majority Opinion, By William J. Brannan

807 Words | 4 Pages

Johnson Majority Opinion,” written by William J. Brannan. A court case is brought about due to the burning of an American flag while on protest. The government was looking at two sides in this court case. Texas and Johnson, had two different opinions on how this event should be handled. Texas’ idea on the burning of the flag is that it should not be accepted nor shall the people's ideas be accepted.

Read More

Why Was Texas Vs Johnson Important

1605 Words | 7 Pages

A major factor, in this case, was his expressions. Many people during this case took offense to Johnson’s action but none of the audience’s opinion

Read More

Controversial Issues In The Texas V. Johnson Case

1182 Words | 5 Pages

Introduction Texas v. Johnson was heard before SCOTUS on June 21, 1989. The two parties involved are Protester Gregory Lee Johnson vs. the State of Texas. In 1989, the U.S. Supreme Court was asked to review the constitutionality of a Texas statute prohibiting the desecration of certain venerated objects, including state and national flags in the case of Texas v. Johnson. The Supreme Court ruled that the burning of the flag is symbolic speech protected by the Free Speech Clause and the statue was strike down.

Read More

United States Vs Eichman Essay

820 Words | 4 Pages

A 5-to-4 decision held that Johnson's burning of a flag was protected expression under the First Amendment and all charges were dropped. In response to this ruling Congress passed the Flag Protection Act Of 1989. “The act states that ‘whoever knowingly mutilates, defaces, physically defiles, burns, maintains on the floor or ground, or tramples upon any flag of the United States shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.’ The act does not prohibit any conduct consisting of the disposal of a flag when it has become worn or soiled." (1989).

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Flag Burning

746 Words | 3 Pages

Burning the flag could not harm a citizen in any way except incite anger. Burning the flag is a representation of a person’s feelings: therefore it is considered “symbolic speech.” In order to amend the Constitution how might Congress define their view of a flag? Since a flag is only a symbol; would that make it illegal to burn a drawing of the American flag? In the Supreme Court case Texas v. Johnson, Justice Stevens argued that “the flag’s unique status as a symbol of national unity outweighed “symbolic speech” (United States Courts).

Read More

Stands For Tolerance

445 Words | 2 Pages

The author states on lines 37-39 "The way to preserve the flag special role is not to punish those who feed differently matter. It is to persuade them that they are wrong." Because of this we can't punish or treat others differently because of what their opinions/beliefs we can only try persuading them without offending. Second, on lines 40-43 for "American Flag Stands for Tolerance" it states "My point is that freedom of conscience and expression is at the core of ourselves conception and requires the rejection of official dogma." This demonstrates that having freedom could cause people rejection which people won't think the same and could lead to disagreements.

Read More

Abel Fields Essay

520 Words | 3 Pages

The law in Texas at the time banned flag burnings. He was convicted, and the case was appealed to the Supreme Court. We ruled that Johnson’s right to free speech had been violated. He was expressing symbolic speech. We ruled that even though an opinion is unpopular, doesn’t mean we have the right to restrict his freedom of

Read More

Pro Flag Burning Essay

2118 Words | 9 Pages

This issue won’t be fixed anytime soon because there are many people who have different opinions. With different opinions can create conflict. This conflict at the moment is as stated before between people for and against flag burning. What it really comes down to be I believe is ones morals? People have different morals and so they will believe what they want to.

Read More

Argumentative Essay: Stop Burning The American Flag !

595 Words | 3 Pages

Cornell University stated in an article, “Johnson was convicted of desertion of a venerated object in violation of Texas statute.” Johnson's actions were protected by the First Amendment so he was not sent to prison as stated in the United States Supreme Court case Texas v Johnson. His actions against the flag should have been more severe. Since Johnson’s actions were not threatening the branches of peace, there was no threat in the moment. “... and since the

Read More

More about Texas V Johnson Majority Opinion Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document