Hello, Pharaud~~
Good post this week. Many people were considered slavery was moral evil in the 18th century; Society always moved by a gentle kind dedicated humanitarian impulse to crush the liberation propaganda. Maybe they were determined as time and circumstances should be left to deal and a necessary evil of slaves is not necessary to be morally responsible for slave-owners. Garrison and abolitionists are all were denied the same opinion (Military, n.d).
In comparison means, Southern slaves were confined more than good at a lot of migrant workers in Northern factories in order to working harmful with unhealthy at the workplace for a long time. Slavery was considered as national prosperity. Slavery advocates argue that if the economic collapse is changed, a large industrial city in the North; many saw it at the same time criticized the South to the North slavery itself nourishing. Slavery was vital for the continuation of the excellent Southern living emphasize good manners and compassion. In 1829 the debate took place at the Constitutional Convention in Virginia whether the abolition of slavery or not in the state. After the revolt of Nat Turner in 1831 to discuss the response it was more intense, Thomas Dew, William and wrote a book defending the president, slavery Mary's University (Southern Justification of Slavery, n.d).
Regards,
…show more content…
(n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/csa/slavery-3.htm
Southern Justification of Slavery. (n.d.). Retrieved from