ipl-logo

The Allure Of Luxury Twitchell Analysis

1326 Words6 Pages

It is difficult to imagine what it would be like living in media driven world that isn't going at a million miles per second. People often just blame the media and advertisers for tugging people in different directions, telling them who or what they should aspire to be to acquire a luxurious lifestyle. Criticizing advertisers for the scrutiny we face is easier than admitting we all want the gourmet meals and high end vehicles because it makes us feel good about being able to experience a luxurious life. James B. Twitchell's piece "The Allure of Luxury" focuses on how we, the middle class consumers who crave luxury, play along with advertisers and marketers in the chase of a luxurious lifestyle, and how it can be a good thing. His historical …show more content…

Twitchell referred to the 1700s with Marie Antoinette then brought it back to how her life influenced the idea of luxury. Later on, he used the Duchess of Windsor from the 1900s and, again, related her to his point of view. At the end, he referred to Tom Ford, Warren Buffet, and Donald Trump. The author used public figures, from past years and current, to demonstrate how humans have always had a craving to the happiness the rich feel from luxe items. The consumers have made this so obvious, allowing advertisers to market to us better. The author also begins with a casual tone, but then, changes, for a moment, to a serious tone to explain how there is a luxury item in every category. His examples are "coffee; there's Starbucks; in ice cream, Häagen-Dazs; in sneakers, Nike; in wine, Chateau Margaux; in cigars, Arturo Fuente Hemingway, and well you know the rest" (120). Twitchell continues with his use of examples of how realistic it is to feel rich. He throws humor back into his work with his short story about Tom Ford. Afterwards, he states " 'Luxury for all' is an oxymoron, all right" bringing his audience back to his point. Finally, he mentions how far the consumer's desire for feeling good and the advertisers have pushed each other. They have also pushed the rich into only allowing them to have two things. The author writes "the filthy rich have only two genuine luxury items left: time and philanthropy." Twitchell ends with humor, and this allows his audience to know he is aware of the opposing view, but he is still aware how silly the consumers and advertisers have made luxury not really

Show More
Related
1453 Words | 6 Pages

One example of this laid-back attitude towards spending money is when Francis goes home after 22 years and gets $10 from Billy. Francis then jokes with his wife, Annie, about putting “…ten dollars toward the frame” (183) for a picture they like. This minor and seemingly harmless remark digs deeper into the person Francis is. Rather than spending money on food or shelter, he would rather spend it on a useless trinket that does not improve his life. Considering the economic climate at the time coupled with his situation, this joke turns into an ignorant statement which explains why he has “…been broke twenty-two years” (182).

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

In Rachel Sherman’s “A Very Expensive Ordinary Life: Conflicted Consumption,” the argument centres around the “legitimization” of wealth by the New York’s upper class in order to be seen as not only rich, but morally worthy. The possession of great wealth alongside their less fortunate peers could be uncomfortable also for those that hold the city’s riches. Hence, New York’s affluent has “legitimized” their wealth and consumption, or on a more macro level, the inequality between the social classes in the city in order to feel more comfortable in their spending, and to manage the impression of the wealthy in the eyes of the greater public in the much morally contested behaviour of lavish spending in an unequal society. This is supported throughout the reading by the justification of excessive spending and consumption by the claim that the rich live an “ordinary” life. The need that they feel towards justifying their spending comes to show that their amount of spending is excessive in the eyes of the ordinary person, in which they also acknowledge themselves as well.

Read More
1040 Words | 5 Pages

Having dealt with the pressure from his parents from a young age, McCandless grew more and more embarrassed of his family’s wealth and “believed that wealth was shameful, corrupting, inherently evil”(Krakauer 115). He later burned all his money and believed strongly that “it looks poorest when you are richest”(Thoreau 9), meaning large amounts of money leave a person feeling empty, which influenced McCandless to travel very lightly at all times. This proved to be a challenge which McCandless would have to overcome after meeting and developing friendships with so many people. Ron Franz was one man who gave McCandless a particularly difficult time in keeping his baggage light. Franz thought of McCandless as a son, and cared deeply for him, but because McCandless was trying to keep his “affairs...as two or three, and not a hundred or a thousand”(Thoreau 3), he kept a distance between himself and Franz, being careful to not become too attached to him.

Read More
121 Words | 1 Pages

Funeral Directors require many skills. Some skills can be taught. Other skills come naturally. Strong science skills are important. Having a general knowledge of science helps.

Read More
828 Words | 4 Pages

Chief executive officers (CEOs) are the corporate employees that are responsible for managing an entire organization. Presently there is a controversy over their salary as to whether it is appropriate or not for one person to be paid so much, especially when the company or the economy may not be performing well. Philosopher Jeff Moriarty wrote an article, “Do CEOs Get Paid Too Much?” that tackles this controversy and he provides possible circumstances in which CEO salaries may be justified. Moriarty’s claim is that CEOs are paid too much, if their salaries are not based off one of three popular views (Moriarty 264).

Read More
1109 Words | 5 Pages

From his research and through my personal experiences, I agree with his overriding thesis that the wealthy dominate all facets of American culture. One of his primary arguments revolves around the lifestyle choices of the American elite. For example, social clubs, including country clubs, are one of the luxuries only offered to the American upper class. Personally speaking, my family never joined a country club due to the intimidating annual and initiation fees associated with such clubs, despite my love for golf and tennis. My family’s social class dictated our ability (or inability) to properly finance our greatest pleasures.

Read More
1696 Words | 7 Pages

Carnegie, Conwell, and Alger Advocates of Wealth for All During the late nineteenth century, a form of Social Darwinism emerged called the Gospel of Wealth also known as the Success Gospel. Social Darwinism is “Herbert Spencer’s adaptation of Charles Darwin’s concepts of natural selection and “survival of the fittest” as it applies to human society” (Nash p. 417). Social Darwinists believed that the social order was the product of the natural selection of the individuals that were best suited for the existing living conditions. These individuals were white, Anglo-Saxon, wealthy men.

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

Not only does the amount of wealth affect social class, but the type of wealth also affects it. It even affects where people live and who people marry as seen with Gatsby and Daisy. The characters social standing affect who they interact and how they are perceived by others. Fitzgerald highlights the different class structures like “New rich” and “Old rich” and the impact of wealth on the people’s lives in those classes. He also shows the superficial nature of the characters and highlights the value placed on wealth.

Read More
2065 Words | 9 Pages

In the story, the narrator describes the rich as “different from you and me. [The rich] possess and enjoy early, and it does something to them, makes them soft where we are hard, and cynical where we are trustful, in a way that, unless you were born rich, it is very difficult to understand” (Fitzgerald, “The Rich Boy” 3). The narrator 's description is very accurate, which is shown especially in the main character, Anson, who was born into a wealthy family and exhibits many of these characteristics. Tate, a critical writer explains that “‘The Rich Boy’ is not so much about wealth itself as about the effect of wealth on character, and the primary effect on Anson is an over power sense of superiority” (1). This superiority that Anson feels directly correlates with his upbringing because he has more money than most people.

Read More
1444 Words | 6 Pages

The unattaintability of these luxurious settings are what draws viewers, however, this also shows the inequality between the working class and the bourgeousie as after watching the shower, viewers will go back to their normal lives of working jobs and not living multi millionare lifestyles, while these viewers are also the reason Kim Kardashian could have such an extravangant

Read More
1439 Words | 6 Pages

His story warns that the pursuit of wealth—even as a means to an end—causes loss, despite the seeming gain. In order to achieve fulfillment, we must abandon that pursuit in favour of the direct pursuit of the things that would do

Read More
670 Words | 3 Pages

Today, money has made many people believe that you need to have a lot of money to live a great, happy life. People in the world, especially the people who don’t have as much money as the ones that do, look up to people like popular idols, because they have money. People think they have a great living life with all the money they have earned during their lives. In the short story “Why You Reckon?” by Langston Hughes, the author uses diction, colloquialism and dialect to express the fact that just because people have the money to go out to eat somewhere expensive or buy the newest clothes, does not mean that a person is happy all the time and expresses how people in the town talks. Money is what makes the world goes round and everyone has come

Read More
1099 Words | 5 Pages

It shows that in order for one to live happily and carefree, one has to be a part of the upper class

Read More
1107 Words | 5 Pages

The protagonist of ‘The Necklace’, Madame Loisel, live a rather steady, ordinary middle-class life in the beginning of the story. However, she views that she is intended for a luxurious life, and, therefore, does not cherish what she has. She takes a step forward to her desires, as she was invited to a ball where all the upper-class woman would be, yet she was unhappy with the fact that she does not even have a stone to put on.

Read More
1004 Words | 5 Pages

Gabrielle Coco Chanel put it so right, “Luxury is a necessity which starts where necessities end.” She also says " Some people think luxury is the opposite of poverty. It is not. It is the opposite of vulgarity.” She considered “Luxury must be comfortable, otherwise it is not luxury.”

Read More

More about The Allure Of Luxury Twitchell Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document