ipl-logo

The Appeals Process

963 Words4 Pages

144 people on death row have been exonerated since 1973 (Levy 1). People exonerated and convicts sent to prison for crimes they did not commit have been given unfair trials. If a trial court makes a legal error, a party can file an appeal, which raises the question on whether the United States appeals process is even effective in criminal cases (The Judicial Learning Center 1). Understanding the effectiveness of the appeals process for criminal cases is essential for improving it to ensure people are not exonerated or unjustly punished. The appeals process is when the losing party in a decision by a trial court in the federal system decides to appeal the decision to the next highest court, the United States Circuit Court of Appeals. In criminal …show more content…

(The Judicial Learning Center 1). According to the United States Department of Justice, in about 95% of appealed criminal cases, the decision upholds or affirms the criminal conviction. The United States Department of Justice website is a government run website that is used to provide unbiased information about the American justice system. The website explains the appeals process is a lengthy process that rarely overturns prior decisions made in lower courts. (United States Department of Justice 1). In Jimmy Dill’s case, the Equal Justice Initiative (EJI) filed an appeal to overturn the lower courts decision, but the appeal was unsuccessful and Jimmy Dill was executed, despite there being concerns he didn’t receive necessary legal assistance. The EJI website explains in their point of view why Jimmy Dill’s execution was unjust in order to get people to understand the unfairness of the American justice system and appeal process. (Equal justice Initiative 1) Another website, FindLaw, explains the appeals process and it can be concluded from the website that the appeals process is unjust because only a …show more content…

On the other hand, only some websites mention the fact that some attorneys are inadequate at their jobs because this is not necessarily a fact and it is not essential information for a person to understand the appeals process. Also, some websites neglect to mention how long the appeals process takes. Since not every website mentions everything about the appeals process, it is important for a person who is researching the effectiveness of the appeals process to look at multiple sources. If a person just looks at the website that says defendants who are determined to be indigent are appointed an attorney, they will get the false impression that is a good thing, but that is not always true (United States Department of Justice 1). A person does not get to choose which attorney they are appointed and not all attorneys are adequate at their jobs. When all the information from multiple sources is put together, it can easily be concluded that the United States appeals process is ineffective in criminal cases. Since the United States appeals process is ineffective in criminal cases, the question arises on how do American citizens improve the appeals process? Some of the reasons the current appeals process is ineffective is because appeals are often denied,

Show More
Related

Murder Of Vanessa Pham By Julio Miguel Blanco-Garcia

1235 Words | 5 Pages

After listening to both sides present their case the judge will issue a ruling on the defendant’s

Read More

Case Brief Of R V Gudgeon

902 Words | 4 Pages

Question of Law / Issues 1. Whether the appeal should be allowed and a retrial ordered to determine whether the prosecution evidence, or sufficient to convict the appellant, should properly be

Read More

Explain Why The Provincial Government Can Combine Two Adjacent Provinces

692 Words | 3 Pages

Appeals or judicial review are processes that allows courts to supervise and double check the decisions of lower courts and tribunals. Power has been delegated down to the lower courts and especially the tribunals, and we need processes like these to ensure the fair use of power. The most important aspect of this is to offer legal recourse when there has been a legal error or a misuse of power. 3. What is the difference between an adversarial hearing and an inquisitorial

Read More

Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Pre-Trail Release

891 Words | 4 Pages

This paper is to help show how sometimes judges can be Bias or inherent in the amount of bail set and other restrictions for pre-trial release while showing the concept of bail what can be done to prevent arbitrary and potentially prejudiced decisions from being made in the courtroom when it comes to bail by the judge, Also discuss the pros and cons of private vs. public defense. Introduction This paper will show the pros and cons of pre-release and define pre-trail release and bond, arbitrary. bond types also look into the factors of bail amounts a judge looks at to determine how much the defendant’s bail is and a few ways to prevent arbitrary and potentially Prejudice decisions from being made in the court by judges.

Read More

Review Of Indefensible By David Feige

1415 Words | 6 Pages

David Feige’s Indefensible: One Lawyer’s Journey nto the Inferno of American Justice invites people from all walks of life to a second hand experience of the criminal justice system hard at work. What is most interesting about Feige’s work is its distinct presentation of the life of a public defender in the South Bronx. Instead of simply detailing out his experiences as a public defender, Feige takes it a step further and includes the experiences of his clients. Without the personal relationships that he carefully constructs with each of his defendants, Feige would not be able to argue that the criminal justice system is flimsy at best, decisions always riding on either the judge’s personal attitudes or the clients propensity towards plea bargaining.

Read More

Lindberg Baby Case Summary

619 Words | 3 Pages

In response to arraignment, the accused is expected to enter a plea. In the Lindberg Baby Case, throughout the arraignment the defendant was charged with kidnapping and murder. Adjudication is the legal process by which an arbiter or judge reviews evidence and argumentation, including legal reasoning set forth by opposing parties or litigants to come to a decision which determines rights and obligations between the parties involved. In the last part of the adjudication process, the judge agrees on the ratio decidendi which is the ground or reason for a decision.

Read More

Under What Circumstances Might A Federal Court Hear A Case

1432 Words | 6 Pages

The conditions in which the Supreme Court hears a case is on an appeal basis. What is the structure of a typical state court system?

Read More

Similarities Between Texas And Federal Court System

458 Words | 2 Pages

This system permits parties to present their cases, and the judge or jury reaches a verdict based on the evidence and arguments provided. Nevertheless, the adversarial system guarantees that both sides of the case are heard, and the decision-making process is transparent and impartial, as it exposes the weaknesses and strengths of each side’s arguments. One significant difference between the two court systems is the method of selecting judges. In the federal system, judges are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, while in Texas, judges are elected by popular vote. This selection process can result in different types of judges, with federal judges typically being selected based on their legal expertise and experience, whereas Texas judges may be more influenced by political factors and public opinion.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Courts And California Courts

342 Words | 2 Pages

According to the Superior Court of California website, there are two systems of courts in California such as federal and state. State courts divide in trial courts and appellate courts. Trial courts may also be called Superior courts, and each county has at least one trial court. Criminal cases, civil cases, appeals of small claims cases and other civil cases worth $25,000 or less are handed to trial courts. Sometimes, superior courts also handle the appeals of misdemeanor cases.

Read More

Supreme Court Review Paper

682 Words | 3 Pages

If the judge decides all or part of the case against you, you can then appeal the case to a higher court. When you have appealed as far as possible, you can consider appealing to the U.S. Supreme

Read More

Bill Of Rights And The 6th Amendment Essay

577 Words | 3 Pages

Going back to the 1790’s the Federal Government have provided the accused with protection. Even though they are being charged with a crime including felony crime this does not give the system the right to do the accused any kind of way. Therefore, the Bill of Rights protects the accused from unfair and unjust treatment. This paper went over some brief history regarding the Bill of Rights and how the 6th Amendment is what it is today, reviewed the meaning and purpose of the 6th Amendment to a speedy trail, as well as discussed the considerations to whether a trail has been

Read More

Bill Of Rights And Protections Of The Fourteenth Amendment

1301 Words | 6 Pages

Supreme Court The Tennessee Federal Appeals Process When a conviction in the Federal District Court, lawyers, plaintiff, or defendants must make a decision whether or not to appeal, due to a brief window of time. A written statement must be submitted explaining any reasons for the appeal, describing specific instances in which significant errors, omissions or negligence prevented individuals from receiving due process.

Read More

Three Levels Of The Federal Courts Essay

492 Words | 2 Pages

They will only review cases in which constitutionality or judicial error is brought into question. The defendant has already been given a guilty verdict and so the question of innocence will not be re-evaluated. However, the appeals court may send the case back to the court of original jurisdiction to be retried, at which the defendant may be determined not guilty in a retrial or the charges may be dropped by the prosecution. The top tier of the federal court system is the U.S. Supreme Court. This court is not mandated to hear the appeals of all criminal cases as is the case with the U.S. Court of Appeals.

Read More

Common Law Vs Trial Court Case Study

702 Words | 3 Pages

The second difference between the two courts is the judges. In trial courts, there is one judge in the courtroom. That judge decides what evidence can and cannot be used and often decides the outcome of the case. In Michigan, appeals are decided by more than one judge. In the Michigan Court of Appeals, three judges hear the case, while in the Michigan Supreme Court, there are nine judges (called justices) that hear each case.

Read More

Appellate Practice And Appellate Practice

349 Words | 2 Pages

Appellate practice refers to the legal steps that must be taken to appeal a court decision, such as a judge’s order or a jury verdict. Typically, appeals are filed when it is believed that the judge made some sort of mistake when reaching the final decision in a case. Appeals may not be filed simply because one of the parties does not like the court’s decision—there must be some mistake upon which to base the appeal. There are specific rules that apply to appeals at the administrative, state, and federal level, and these rules must be carefully followed, or else the appeal may be dismissed. For example, some appellate courts provide specific rules as to the format of the appeal.

Read More

More about The Appeals Process

Related Topics

Open Document