The Articles Of Confederation Was A Dismal Failure

1059 Words5 Pages

Towards the end of the Revolutionary War, the founding fathers decided that that the colonies would need some form of government that would unify them. At the same time, they decided that they wanted to avoid creating a monarchial type of government from which they had just split. The period just after the Revolutionary War was a critical time for the fledging country and it was important that the government formed would not only unify the colonies and protect them, not only from foreign countries, but also from destroying themselves internally. The Articles of Confederation, the new nation’s first attempt at creating a framework of government, was a dismal failure. Under the Articles of Confederation, almost all of the power was in …show more content…

Under the Articles of Confederation, there was no Executive Branch of government, no power of taxation, no right for the central government to regulate trade, no way of enforcing any of the laws that it passed and no right to declare war (Congress 1). All thirteen states had to ratify unanimously any legislation for it pass (Blum 118). These restrictions severely limited the national government and made it very weak. “The impotence of Congress made the United States a beggar in the eyes of the world” (Blum 119). It order to rectify the problems created by the Articles of Confederation, a convention was called to rewrite the Articles, but, when the founding fathers gathered in May of Stemple 2 1787, they decided instead to write a new outline for the government of the new nation. This new document, known today as the Constitution of the United States, provided a framework for our government that we still follow to this day (Congress for Kids 5). On May 25, 1787 until September 17, 1787, delegates from twelve of the thirteen states met in the State House in Philadelphia (Blum 120). This gathering, called the …show more content…

When discussing and writing the framework for the new Constitution, the delegates wanted to ensure that the new government would not be able to become all powerful and that no one person would gain absolute power over the people. In order to ensure that no one state would have more power than another, it was decided from the beginning of the process that, no matter how many delegates a state sent, each state would have only one vote when issues were voted upon. Over the next four months, the delegates met in the State House in Philadelphia. The proceedings of these meetings were secret. Early on, the issue of how many representatives each state would have under the new government arose. The larger states supported the Virginia Plan in which the number of representatives was based on a state’s population (Weatherman 2). The smaller states, afraid of losing power in the new government because under that plan their number of representatives would be substantially less would not accept the Virginia Plan and instead opted for the New Jersey Plan in which each state would Stemple