In this courtroom today an important matter must be discussed. A man by the name of Faber has been set on trial. This may not seem to indifferent because most of the evidence has been noted, but no one knows the entire story. Faber attempted to help society, he did nothing wrong, except for attempting to endeavor a censored government.
An opinion has already been made on Faber, even though this shouldn’t be made yet. An innocent man has been set on trial today, but will anyone believe this? Faber is justified in making his last mission to print more copies of the bible, because he felt society could be better. Now, a question for the courtroom, what can change society for the better? People listening and not getting distracted by the smallest thing,? Or all people being equal? All of these answers are
…show more content…
Society cannot function well at all, even if the books are burnt, there will always be someone going against society. Eventually after having a censored government for so long there will be a point where there will be a revolution or chaos in the society. Think about twenty or thirty years from now. If just a one or two people a year go against society, the numbers eventually go up. If this happens then eventually the people on the run will join up and revolt. On page 143 Bradberry writes about Montage meeting up with some people, and if enough people do this then there may be a revolt (Bradberry pg. 143).
Faber promised Montag that he would help him, and after Montag is on the run he still wishes to help. He knew that since Montag being on the run from society that he would have to finish what Montag started alone. Faber simply wished to help an old friend, and he promised to help Montag as a friend, not an accomplice. Even though Montag commited a crime against society this doesn’t mean that Faber is a part of this crime, he had no part in the crime apart from helping a