ipl-logo

The Case Of Ernesto Miranda

484 Words2 Pages

A man by the name of Ernesto Miranda was taken to custody in 1963 for kidnapping and rape. Then was sentenced 20-30 years in jail. He was interrogated for two hours by two police men, every individual should have their own rights to ask and answer questions unless told to Mirandize by a police man or the judge. Ernesto was being asked questions during the interrogation and the thing you’re supposed to do when they ask you questions is answer the questions, so Ernesto should have the right to talk during the interrogation. Ernesto didn’t know he should have a lawyer present during court when they discussed about his case of kidnapping and rape. He confessed he committed rape and kidnapping during his year in LA, the victim was 17 years old by that time she got kidnapped by Ernesto. …show more content…

She recognized the plate number and the designs on his car. Ernesto was taken to custody, because of what he did he was sent to court but he didn’t have lawyer present in court, he wasn’t told he should have a lawyer present during court so he was in a bigger situation than he ever was, he had to go through jury. He was always interviewed by the police men so they could get more evidence of his crime. This case happened in 1966 when he was arrested in his home and taken to court for his hearing. They didn’t give him the right say his confession in court they forced him to say it. Ernesto appeared at the U.S Supreme Court, he then heard the recorded tape of his confessions Then decided to make a complaint about his rights to the judge at the supreme court. Ernesto was angry of how they treated him in the court, he said that every man or woman should have equal rights. Everything Ernesto said in his confessions were used against him during

Show More
Related
1235 Words | 5 Pages

Not long into the trip to the ER, Vanessa took a wrong turn which roused the suspicions of her drug addled passenger. Convinced that Vanessa intended to turn him in to the police or otherwise wrong him, Garcia pulled a butcher knife out of his backpack and attacked Vanessa. The assault caused Vanessa to lose

Read More
527 Words | 3 Pages

The case involved an individual by the name of Danny Escobedo, who was arrested on January 19, 1960, for the murder of his brother-in-law. Escobedo was arrested without a warrant and interrogated; he did not make any statement to the police and was released after contacting his lawyer. On January 30, Benedict DiGerlando, told the police about Escobedo’s involvement in the crime that Escobedo “had fired the fatal shots” (Escobedo v. Illinois- Supreme Court Cases: The Dynamic Court, 1999, pg.2). He was later arrested a second time and taken to the police headquarters. Soon enough Escobedo requested to have “advice from my lawyer”

Read More
1247 Words | 5 Pages

Case Name: U.S. ex rel. Cannon v. Smith Case Citation: 388 F. Supp. 1201 (W.D.N.Y. 1975) Procedural History: State prisoner filed pro se application for writ of habeas corpus to secure his release from imprisonment for rape. The U.S. District Court for the Western Division of New York denied his request and he appealed. The U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit remanded.

Read More
1933 Words | 8 Pages

Mucolly The Supreme Court settles yet another argument; this time, it is MuCulloch v. Maryland. The end decision helped broaden the roles of the federal government, but not necessarily supplied the government with more power. It also shows that activities that fall into the federal category are taken care of seriously and with a reason.

Read More
1119 Words | 5 Pages

The first case that I’m going to talk about is the Erma Faye Stewart case and Regina Kelly case. These two women were charged with felony drug distribution charges. This case took place in Hearne, Texas back in 2000. Stewart and Kelly along with 25 other men were charged in this case. Everybody bail was set to 70,000 each.

Read More
364 Words | 2 Pages

In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Pheonix, Arizona for the kidnapping and raping of a woman. When questioned by police officers, Miranda would eventually give a confession, and sign it, which wasn 't the case.. Before the court, this confession would be used against Miranda, and with it, the implication that it was received voluntarily and with the convicted knowing his rights. Miranda was convicted with a 20-30 year sentence. Upon eventually learning that his confession was obtained unlawfully, Miranda would appeal to the Arizona Supreme Court, asking for an overturn, and when that fell through, would turn to the United States Supreme Court, filing a habeas corpus.

Read More
1587 Words | 7 Pages

The police told him about the statement that the other suspect made. The police and prosecutors informed Escobedo that though he wasn't formally charged, he was in custody and could not leave. They kept him handcuffed and questioned him for fourteen and a half hours and refused his repeated request to speak with his attorney. Escobedo's attorney went to the police station and asked to speak with Escobedo, and he too was denied. A Spanish-speaking officer was left alone with Escobedo and allegedly told him that if he blamed the other suspect for the murder, then he would be free to go.

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

Between 2002-04, three young ladies were grabbed and consequently detained by Ariel Castro (July 10, 1960 – September 3, 2013) in his home in the Tremont neighborhood of Cleveland, Ohio. Michelle Knight, Amanda Berry, and Georgina "Gina" Dejesus were held without wanting to in his home on Seymour Avenue until May 6, 2013, when Berry got away with her six-year-old girl and reached the police. Knight and Dejesus were saved by reacting officers and Castro was captured inside hours. On May 8, 2013, Castro was accused of four tallies of abducting and three checks of rape. Castro pled blameworthy to 937 criminal numbers of assault, grabbing, and disturbed murder as a feature of a supplication deal.

Read More
1106 Words | 5 Pages

In my court case in 1963 Ernesto Arturo Miranda is being accused of kidnapping, and raping. Miranda appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court, saying that the police had gotten his confession unconstitutionally. The U.S Supreme Court review the case in 1966. Chief Justice Earl Warren, said that the confession could not be used as evidence because the evidence was gotten unconstitutionally. Miranda was not told that he had rights like the fifth and sixth amendment so he did not know, that is why the confession was not used as evidence.

Read More
1394 Words | 6 Pages

On November 14, 2012 Pedro Hernandez was indicated by a grand jury and was charged with second-degree murder and first-degree kidnapping (Dienst, J., & Prokupecz, S., 2012). Although Hernandez confessed the case is still ongoing do to mistakes made during the interrogation according to Harvey Fishbein who is Pedro Hernandez lawyer (McKinley, J. C., Jr.,

Read More
1050 Words | 5 Pages

She was unaware of anything that had happened until they had met up and he informed her. They then walked to the police station where he turned himself in, was arrested and gave a statement. That night 40,000 people walked from Castro street to city hall with

Read More
88 Words | 1 Pages

“The Judge and the General” is a documentary depicting the long and complex process that Judge Juan Guzman had to face in order to find the truth on General Pinochet 's atrocities. Due to Judge Guzman having grown up in a high class, he was sheltered from the reality that the lower working class had to deal with. He had no knowledge on the imprisonments, torture, disappearances and murders that were occurring under Pinochet 's dictatorship, so for him to get a case where he can indict Pinochet was difficult.

Read More
1034 Words | 5 Pages

He joined a gang and smoked cocaine. Somebody in the street offered Lopez a bed to stay in instead of sleeping on the floor but instead of accepting it, he took this stranger to a abandoned building and sexually abused him. While being a 10 year old homeless child , an older American couple found him on the

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

He killed over about one hundred girls from different native tribes and a native tribe caught him, buried him from the neck down in sand, beaten, and tortured him by pouring syrup all over his head to watch the ants eat him but, he managed to escape and went to Columbia then Ecuador. This became a daily routine where he would kill about two to three girls a day for about four years. Lopez said, "I like the girls in Ecuador, they are more gentle and trusting, more innocent." Even though he was poor and homeless, he was still all over the place moving from city to city murdering young girls day by day. In April 1980, four murdered children were uncovered by a flood and after the flood, he was arrested for attempting to abduct a young girl and went to prison.

Read More
890 Words | 4 Pages

Arizona, Were his rights violated? It is obvious that Ernesto 's rights were not clear to him. Before his interrogation, Miranda was unaware of his rights and when he made his confession, they were entirely thrown out. In 1965, the court agreed to heir his case. Miranda 's case won 5-4 and a statement was made.

Read More

More about The Case Of Ernesto Miranda

Related Topics

Open Document